Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Water Sci Technol ; 76(9-10): 2593-2602, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29168699

ABSTRACT

This paper reports a facile method for removal of sulfate from wastewater by magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MMWCNTs). Multi-walled carbon nanotubes and MMWCNTs were characterized by X-ray diffraction, Raman, transmission electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and vibrating sample magnetometry. The results of the analysis indicated that MMWCNTs were synthesized successfully. The MMWCNTs can be easily manipulated in a magnetic field for the desired separation, leading to the removal of sulfate from wastewater. Response surface methodology (RSM) coupled with central composite design was applied to evaluate the effects of D/C (adsorbent dosage per initial concentration of pollutant (mgadsorbent/(mg/l)initial)) and pH on sulfate removal (%). Using RSM methodology, a quadratic polynomial equation was obtained, for removal of sulfate, by multiple regression analysis. The optimum combination for maximum sulfate removal of 93.28% was pH = 5.96 and D/C = 24.35. The experimental data were evaluated by the Langmuir and Freundlich adsorption models. The adsorption capacity of sulfate in the studied concentration range was 56.94 (mg/g). It was found out that the MMWCNTs could be considered as a promising adsorbent for the removal of sulfate from wastewater.


Subject(s)
Magnetics/methods , Nanotubes, Carbon/chemistry , Sulfates/chemistry , Wastewater/chemistry , Water Pollutants, Chemical/chemistry , Water Purification/methods , Adsorption , Microscopy, Electron, Transmission , Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared , Sulfur Oxides/chemistry , X-Ray Diffraction
2.
J Prosthodont ; 23(5): 417-9, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24417537

ABSTRACT

This article describes a new, precise, and simple method for making an impression with an individual tray for a patient with microstomia. In this method, a Pindex system on the handle of the tray was used for attaching two parts of the sectional tray.


Subject(s)
Dental Impression Technique/instrumentation , Microstomia/complications , Alginates/chemistry , Dental Impression Materials/chemistry , Dental Pins , Equipment Design , Humans , Resins, Synthetic/chemistry
3.
J Prosthet Dent ; 112(1): 38-44, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24388717

ABSTRACT

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The retention of cement-retained implant-supported restorations can be affected by the height of the abutments. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of the surface treatment on the retention of implant-supported zirconia restorations over short abutments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty solid abutments reduced to 3 mm in height and their corresponding fixture replicas were embedded vertically in autopolymerizing acrylic resin blocks. Eighty zirconia copings (Cercon) with an occlusal loop were fabricated and divided into 2 groups (n=40). One group was airborne-particle abraded with 110 µm aluminium oxide and the other group was treated with silica coating (Rocatec System). Each group was then divided into 4 subgroups (n=10). The subgroups received either no treatment (control) or were treated with silane (Clearfil Porcelain Bond Activator+SE Primer), acid etching followed by silane, or ceramic primer (Clearfil). All copings were luted with a self-adhesive luting agent (Clearfil SA). After 1 week of conditioning in artificial saliva and thermal cycling (5000 cycles, 5°C-55°C), the removal force of the copings were tested with a universal testing machine at a 5 mm/min crosshead speed. The dislodgment force and failure mode were recorded. Two-way ANOVA and the Tukey honestly significant difference and the Fisher exact tests were used for data analysis (α=.05). RESULTS: The highest retentive values were obtained for airborne-particle abrasion--ceramic primer (228.84 N) and silica coating--ceramic primer (230.37 N), which were not significantly different from silica coating alone (216.26 N; P=.95) or a combination of airborne-particle abrasion followed by silanation (211.67 N; P=.87). The failure mode was primarily adhesive and cement principally remained on the copings. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, ceramic primer that contains adhesive phosphate monomer significantly improved the retention of zirconia ceramic restorations. Silicoating as a mechanical treatment provided greater retention for zirconia copings than airborne-particle abrasion when a resin-luting agent was used.


Subject(s)
Dental Abutments , Dental Materials/chemistry , Dental Prosthesis Retention , Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported , Zirconium/chemistry , Acid Etching, Dental/methods , Aluminum Oxide/chemistry , Dental Cements/chemistry , Dental Etching/methods , Dental Stress Analysis/instrumentation , Humans , Materials Testing , Resin Cements/chemistry , Saliva, Artificial/chemistry , Silanes/chemistry , Silicon Dioxide/chemistry , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties , Temperature
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...