Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Obes Surg ; 29(3): 911-916, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30484174

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are cornerstone in multimodal analgesia protocols. This point is of great value in morbidly obese patients due to the high prevalence of restrictive pulmonary disease and obstructive sleep apnea. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that NSAIDs do not increase acute bariatric surgery complications while optimizing postoperative analgesia. METHODS: Databases of two medical centers were retrospectively reviewed to find all patients who underwent bariatric surgery between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2017. Inclusion criteria were BMI greater than 30 kg/m2 and age of 16-75 years old. Patients who suffered from severe organ failure or coagulation disorders were excluded. Patient's demographics, obesity-related diseases (diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia), postoperative pain scores, and morphine consumption in PACU, as well as early and late surgical complications, were collected. Patients included from the first institution (where NSAIDs analgesia was prohibited: control group) were compared to patients from the second institution (where NSAIDs analgesia was mandatory: case group). RESULTS: The study population included 270 patients, 134 in the control group, and 136 in the case group. NSAIDs usage produced better analgesia with significant reduction in morphine consumption and PACU length of stay. Also, incidence of surgical complications was the same in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: NSAIDs administration do not increase postoperative complication rate after bariatric surgery. Although NSAID administration provided better analgesia and shorter PACU stay, future prospective studies are needed to confirm these encouraging results and to evaluate their impact on postoperative rehabilitation.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Bariatric Surgery , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Analgesics/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Bariatric Surgery/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Morphine/administration & dosage , Morphine/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
2.
J Med Liban ; 58(2): 65-70, 2010.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20549891

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Mupirocin applied to the anterior nares four times daily usually eliminates Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin resistant, within 48 hours. Prophylactic intranasal mupirocin is safe, inexpensive and effective in reducing the overall sternal wound infection after open-heart surgery. This study was designed to determine whether decreasing nasal bacterial colonization by applying mupirocin intra nasally decreases mediastinal, sternal, pulmonary and cutaneous infections after open-heart surgery. MATERIAL & METHODS: After institutional approval and informed consent, 392 patients were included in a randomized, prospective study. Nasal cultures were taken for all patients before surgery. Patients were divided in two groups: Group I (n = 190) receiving mupirocin in the anterior nares 4 times daily for 48 hours before surgery; Group II (n = 202) was the control group. Patients were followed for a month after surgery. All mediastinal, sternal, pulmonary and cutaneous infections were documented and treated with appropriate antibiotics. A Student test for quantitative data and a chi2 test for qualitative data were used for statistical analysis. p < or = 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The two groups had the same demographic characteristics and risk factors. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus was 36.2% in the two groups. Neither mediastinitis nor sternitis were noticed in any of the two groups. There was no statistical difference between the groups according to the frequency of the cutaneous infections (Group I: 19/190 - Group II: 13/202) and pneumonia (Group I: 7/190 - Group II: 13/202). In patients who had nasal carriage of Staphylococcus, nasal decontamination has not shown a statistical difference of cutaneous infections of the lower limbs nor pneumonia. Although nasal decontamination reduced the incidence of sternal wound infection (Gr I 0/190 - Gr II 4/202 ; p = 0.017). Staphylococcus aureus, in the control group, induced more cutaneous infections (30.8% vs 11.7% ; p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: The usage of mupirocin for nasal decontamination before open-heart surgery reduces the incidence of the sternal wound infection, and does not seem to affect the frequency of cutaneous infections of the lower limbs nor pneumonia after this surgery.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures , Mupirocin/administration & dosage , Nasal Cavity/microbiology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Administration, Intranasal , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Preoperative Care , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...