Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Heart Lung ; 45(5): 434-40, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27493022

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Explore (1) the characteristics of the Maine population with delayed geographic access to interventional cardiology (IC) services and (2) the effect of delayed geographic IC access on coronary mortality. BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS), ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI), and non-ST segment elevated myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) are highly prevalent. Coronary mortality is minimized when victims have prompt IC access. METHODS: The study design was (1) an exploration of census data to investigate disparities in geographic IC access and (2) a secondary analysis of administrative claims data to investigate coronary mortality relative to delayed geographic IC access. RESULTS: Delayed access was associated in the Maine population with rural residence, advanced age, high school education, and lack of health insurance. Delayed access was associated with increased unadjusted coronary mortality, but not age-adjusted coronary mortality. CONCLUSION: Delayed geographic IC access was associated with disparity but not with increased age-adjusted coronary mortality.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/surgery , Coronary Care Units , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Rural Health Services/organization & administration , Rural Population , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Time-to-Treatment , Treatment Outcome , United States
2.
J Nurs Meas ; 24(2): 72-82, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27535304

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Resistiveness to Care Scale for Dementia of the Alzheimer's Type was developed to quantify care-resistant behavior. The purpose of this article is to explain how the instrument was modified and tested in two clinical studies that examined interventions to improve the oral hygiene of persons with dementia who resist care. METHODS: After pilot testing, the revised instrument (RTC-r) was used in 7 facilities (N = 83 residents). Systematic training procedures were implemented to preserve reliability. RESULTS: Clinical validity was confirmed throughout the pilot and interventional studies. Reliability was assessed using inter-rater reliability, which ranged from 0.87 (p < .001) to 1.0 (p < .001) across 2,328 mouth care observations. CONCLUSIONS: The RTC-r validly and reliably measures care-resistant behavior in persons with dementia.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/nursing , Models, Nursing , Nurse's Role , Oral Hygiene/nursing , Treatment Refusal/psychology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Health Services for the Aged , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nursing Homes , United States
3.
J Gerontol Nurs ; 42(3): 15-23; quiz 24-5, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26934969

ABSTRACT

The purpose of the current article is to describe a personalized practice originally conceived as a way to prevent and minimize care-resistant behavior to provide mouth care to older adults with dementia. The original intervention, Managing Oral Hygiene Using Threat Reduction Strategies (MOUTh), matured during the clinical trial study into a relationship-centered intervention, with emphasis on developing strategies that support residents' behavioral health and staff involved in care. Relationships that were initially pragmatic (i.e., focused on the task of completing mouth care) developed into more personal and responsive relationships that involved deeper engagement between mouth care providers and nursing home (NH) residents. Mouth care was accomplished and completed in a manner enjoyable to NH residents and mouth care providers. The MOUTh intervention may also concurrently affirm the dignity and personhood of the care recipient because of its emphasis on connecting with older adults.


Subject(s)
Dementia/therapy , Nurse-Patient Relations , Nursing Homes , Oral Hygiene , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Dementia/complications , Dementia/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Personhood
4.
5.
Brain Behav ; 5(10): e00398, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26516616

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are ischemic emergencies. Guidelines recommend care delivery within formally regionalized systems of care at designated centers, with bypass of nearby centers of lesser or no designation. We review the evidence of the effectiveness of regionalized systems in AIS and STEMI. METHODS: Literature was searched using terms corresponding to designation of AIS and STEMI systems and from 2010 to the present. Inclusion criteria included report of an outcome on any dependent variable mentioned in the rationale for regionalization in the guidelines and an independent variable comparing care to a non- or pre-regionalized system. Designation was defined in the AIS case as certification by the Joint Commission as either a primary (PSC) or comprehensive (CSC) stroke center. In the STEMI case, the search was conducted linking "regionalization" and "myocardial infarction" or citation as a model system by any American Heart Association statement. RESULTS: For AIS, 17 publications met these criteria and were selected for review. In the STEMI case, four publications met these criteria; the search was therefore expanded by relaxing the criteria to include any historical or anecdotal comparison to a pre- or nonregionalized state. The final yield was nine papers from six systems. CONCLUSION: Although regionalized care results in enhanced process and reduced unadjusted rates of disparity in access and adverse outcomes, these differences tend to become nonsignificant when adjusted for delayed presentation and hospital arrival by means other than emergency medical services. The benefits of regionalized care occur along with a temporal trend of improvement due to uptake of quality initiatives and guideline recommendations by all systems regardless of designation. Further research is justified with a randomized registry or cluster randomized design to support or refute recommendations that regionalization should be the standard of care.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medicine/organization & administration , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Stroke/therapy , Humans , Treatment Outcome , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...