ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to evaluate the effect of adding a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), celecoxib (CEL), to a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), golimumab (GOL), compared with TNFi monotherapy on radiographic spinal progression in patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) over 2 years. METHODS: R-axSpA patients, having risk factors for radiographic progression (high disease activity plus C reactive protein >5 mg/L and/or ≥1 syndesmophyte(s)), underwent a 12-week run-in phase with GOL 50 mg every 4 weeks. In the core phase (96 weeks), only patients with a good clinical response at week 12 were randomised (1:1) to GOL+CEL 200 mg two times per day (combination therapy) or GOL monotherapy. The primary endpoint was radiographic progression assessed by modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS) change at week 108 in the intent-to-treat population. RESULTS: A total of 128 patients were enrolled in the run-in phase; and 109 patients were randomised at week 12 to monotherapy (n=55) or combination therapy (n=54). At week 108, 97 (52 vs 45) patients completed the study. The change in mSASSS at week 108 was 1.7 (95% CI 0.8 to 2.6) in the monotherapy vs 1.1 (95% CI 0.4 to 1.8) in the combination therapy groups (p=0.79). New syndesmophytes occurred in 25% of patients in the monotherapy vs 11% of patients in the combination therapy groups (p=0.12). During the study, no significant differences in adverse events and serious adverse events were observed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with GOL+CEL did not demonstrate statistically significant superiority over GOL monotherapy in retarding radiographic spinal progression over 2 years in r-axSpA.
Subject(s)
Spondylarthropathies , Spondylitis, Ankylosing , Humans , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Radiography , Spine/diagnostic imaging , Spine/pathology , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/drug therapy , Celecoxib/therapeutic use , Spondylarthropathies/drug therapy , Disease ProgressionABSTRACT
Regarding scarce capacities an early detection consultation (EDC) was established to discriminate patients in an outpatient setting with inflammatory from non-inflammatory rheumatic diseases. A total of 500 patients suspected of having a rheumatic disease received an appointment within 2 weeks. They were interviewed with the help of a digital questionnaire (RhePort), briefly physically examined followed by a determination of CRP. The questionnaire answers were scored using an algorithm within RhePort (from 0â¯= non-inflammatory to 4â¯= highly probably inflammatory). Likewise, after completion of the EDC, the rheumatologists scored the overall assessment. The RhePort score and EDC score were compared with the "true" diagnosis made in a detailed second examination after an average of 10 weeks. In 490 evaluable patients 133 inflammatory (27%) and 357 noninflammatory rheumatic diseases (73%) were diagnosed. A classification based solely on the RhePort questionnaire (score >â¯1) identified 103 out of 129 as inflammatory (sens. 80%) and 125 out of 355 as non-inflammatory (spec. 35%) resulting in an AUC of 0.62 after ROC analysis. With a score >â¯1, the rheumatological assessment after EDC classified 130 out of 133 patients as inflammatory (sensitivity 98%) and 261 out of 357 as non-inflammatory (specificity 73%). The combined EDC can decisively increase the sensitivity and specificity compared to an "automated" survey by means of a digital questionnaire alone. In addition to the early identification and treatment of inflammatory patients, rapid identification of patients who are not in need of rheumatological treatment can create capacities for care.
