Distinct effects of CD86-mediated costimulation on resting versus activated human CD4+ T cells.

CD80 and CD86 are important in the initiation of T cell immunity. Although their costimulatory function has long been appreciated, it remains unclear whether the biological significance of the two B7 isoforms resides in their different patterns and kinetics of expression or whether differences exist in their function. We have addressed this issue using HLA-DR1 transfectants co-expressing CD80, CD86, or both molecules as stimulators for naïve, memory, and activated human CD4+ T cells. Both CD80 and CD86 efficiently costimulated alloresponses by unseparated peripheral blood CD4+ T cells; however, CD86 was substantially inferior in costimulating alloresponses by separated memory T cells, and completely incompetent in costimulating three human T cell clones. Furthermore, CD80/CD86 double transfectants stimulated lower responses by the clones than cells expressing CD80 alone. That CD86 was actively inhibitory rather than merely neutral was evidenced by the increase in response to the double CD80/CD86 APC when anti-CD86 antibody was added. Furthermore, addition of anti-CTLA-4 Fab to cultures of HLA-DR1 transfectants co-expressing CD86, fully restored the proliferative response. These results indicate that CD80 and CD86 mediate distinct signals in previously activated T cells, and demonstrate that CTLA-4 ligation may dominate the outcome of CD86-mediated costimulation of activated CD4+ T cells.

Cross-species costimulation: relative contributions of CD80, CD86, and CD40.

BACKGROUND: The response of human CD4+ T cells against porcine cells is of comparable magnitude to that induced by human leukocyte antigen-mismatched allogeneic cells. This reflects productive interactions between key costimulatory molecules across the species barrier. Inhibition of these molecular interactions will be crucial in overcoming CD4+ T-cell-mediated rejection of xenografts. We have performed a detailed investigation to determine the expression profiles and relative contributions of the three key costimulatory molecules in the porcine-human xenogeneic response. Whereas only porcine CD86 is constitutively expressed on resting endothelial cells, both CD40 and CD80 are rapidly expressed after activation. All three costimulatory molecules are expressed by professional antigen-presenting cells. METHODS: We have isolated full-length cDNA clones for human and porcine CD80, CD86, and CD40. Human fibroblast cell lines (M1) coexpressing DR1 were transfected with these cDNAs and used in mixed lymphocyte reactions and flow cytometric studies in vitro. RESULTS: These data provide the first characterization of the expression profile and functional role of porcine CD80. Functional assays demonstrate that pCD40, pCD80, and pCD86 are independently capable of costimulating human CD4+ T cells, albeit with differing kinetics. Proliferative responses were of comparable magnitude to those obtained when costimulation was provided by human CD40, CD80, and CD86. CONCLUSIONS: These data have implications for therapy targeting the direct pathway of xenorecognition; costimulatory molecule blockade must be directed against both the B7/CD28 and CD40/CD40L pathways.