Alternative Routes to Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Revealed by Reprogramming of the Neural Lineage.

During the reprogramming of mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) to induced pluripotent stem cells, the activation of pluripotency genes such as NANOG occurs after the mesenchymal to epithelial transition. Here we report that both adult stem cells (neural stem cells) and differentiated cells (astrocytes) of the neural lineage can activate NANOG in the absence of cadherin expression during reprogramming. Gene expression analysis revealed that only the NANOG+E-cadherin+ populations expressed stabilization markers, had upregulated several cell cycle genes; and were transgene independent. Inhibition of DOT1L activity enhanced both the numbers of NANOG+ and NANOG+E-cadherin+ colonies in neural stem cells. Expressing SOX2 in MEFs prior to reprogramming did not alter the ratio of NANOG colonies that express E-cadherin. Taken together these results provide a unique pathway for reprogramming taken by cells of the neural lineage.

Collaborative rewiring of the pluripotency network by chromatin and signalling modulating pathways.

Reprogramming of somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) represents a profound change in cell fate. Here, we show that combining ascorbic acid (AA) and 2i (MAP kinase and GSK inhibitors) increases the efficiency of reprogramming from fibroblasts and synergistically enhances conversion of partially reprogrammed intermediates to the iPSC state. AA and 2i induce differential transcriptional responses, each leading to the activation of specific pluripotency loci. A unique cohort of pluripotency genes including Esrrb require both stimuli for activation. Temporally, AA-dependent histone demethylase effects are important early, whereas Tet enzyme effects are required throughout the conversion. 2i function could partially be replaced by depletion of components of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) and insulin growth factor pathways, indicating that they act as barriers to reprogramming. Accordingly, reduction in the levels of the EGF receptor gene contributes to the activation of Esrrb. These results provide insight into the rewiring of the pluripotency network at the late stage of reprogramming.

The nexus of Tet1 and the pluripotency network.

Resetting DNA methylation and reactivation of pluripotency genes are late events in the formation of iPSCs. Recent work by Costa et al. (2013) and Gao et al. (2013) has examined the role of Tet proteins in the hydroxymethylation of pluripotency genes, with the latter replacing Oct4 with Tet1 for reprogramming.

Differentiating embryonic stem cells pass through 'temporal windows' that mark responsiveness to exogenous and paracrine mesendoderm inducing signals.

BACKGROUND: Mesendoderm induction during embryonic stem cell (ESC) differentiation in vitro is stimulated by the Transforming Growth Factor and Wingless (Wnt) families of growth factors. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We identified the periods during which Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) 4, Wnt3a or Activin A were able to induce expression of the mesendoderm marker, Mixl1, in differentiating mouse ESCs. BMP4 and Wnt3a were required between differentiation day (d) 1.5 and 3 to most effectively induce Mixl1, whilst Activin A induced Mixl1 expression in ESC when added between d2 and d4, indicating a subtle difference in the requirement for Activin receptor signalling in this process. Stimulation of ESCs with these factors at earlier or later times resulted in little Mixl1 induction, suggesting that the differentiating ESCs passed through 'temporal windows' in which they sequentially gained and lost competence to respond to each growth factor. Inhibition of either Activin or Wnt signalling blocked Mixl1 induction by any of the three mesendoderm-inducing factors. Mixing experiments in which chimeric EBs were formed between growth factor-treated and untreated ESCs revealed that BMP, Activin and Wnt signalling all contributed to the propagation of paracrine mesendoderm inducing signals between adjacent cells. Finally, we demonstrated that the differentiating cells passed through 'exit gates' after which point they were no longer dependent on signalling from inducing molecules for Mixl1 expression. CONCLUSIONS: These studies suggest that differentiating ESCs are directed by an interconnected network of growth factors similar to those present in early embryos and that the timing of growth factor activity is critical for mesendoderm induction.

Endocrine cells develop within pancreatic bud-like structures derived from mouse ES cells differentiated in response to BMP4 and retinoic acid.

We have examined factors affecting the in vitro differentiation of Pdx1(GFP/w) ESCs to pancreatic endocrine cells. Inclusion of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 4 (BMP4) during the first four days of differentiation followed by a 24-hour pulse of retinoic acid (RA) induced the formation of GFP(+) embryoid bodies (EBs). GFP expression was restricted to E-cadherin(+) tubes and GFP bright (GFP(br)) buds, reminiscent of GFP(+) early foregut endoderm and GFP(br) pancreatic buds observed in Pdx1(GFP/w) embryos. These organoid structures developed without further addition of exogenous factors between days 5 and 12, suggesting that day 5 EBs contained a template for the subsequent phase of development. EBs treated with nicotinamide after day 12 of differentiation expressed markers of endocrine and exocrine differentiation, but only in cells within the GFP(br) buds. Analysis of Pdx1(GFP/w) ESCs modified by targeting a dsRed1 gene to the Ins1 locus (Pdx1(GFP/w)Ins1(RFP/w) ESCs) provided corroborating evidence that insulin positive cells arose from GFP(br) buds, mirroring the temporal relationship between pancreatic bud development and the formation of endocrine cells in the developing embryo. The readily detectable co-expression of GFP and RFP in grafts derived from transplanted EBs demonstrated the utility of Pdx1(GFP/w)Ins1(RFP/w) ESCs for investigating pancreatic differentiation in vitro and in vivo.