Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Pain Pract ; 13(4): 297-309, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22925591

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Intrathecal (IT) drug delivery systems for patients with chronic non-malignant pain are intended to improve pain and quality of life and reduce side effects of systemic use. A subset of patients may have escalating pain, functional decline, and/or intolerable side effects even as IT opioid doses are increased. Discontinuation of IT medications may represent a viable treatment option but strategies to accomplish this are needed. SUBJECTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Three patients with intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS), inadequate pain control, and declining functionality underwent abrupt IT opioid cessation. This was accomplished through a standardized protocol with symptom-triggered administration of clonidine and buprenorphine, monitored using the clinical opiate withdrawal scale. RESULTS: Symptoms of IT withdrawal were similar in all patients and included diuresis, agitation, hyperalgesia, mild diarrhea, yawning, and taste and smell aversion. Hypertension and tachycardia were effectively controlled by clonidine administration. Classic symptoms of withdrawal, such as piloerection, chills, severe diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, diaphoresis, myoclonus, and mydriasis, were not noted. At 2 to 3 months follow-up, patients reported decreased, but ongoing pain, with improvements in functional capacity and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary work demonstrates the safety of abrupt IT opioid cessation utilizing standardized inpatient withdrawal protocols. To our knowledge, these are among the first reported cases of intentional, controlled IT opioid cessation without initiation of an opioid bridge: self-reported pain scores, functional capacity, and quality of life improved. The IT opioid withdrawal syndrome is characterized based upon our observations and a review of the literature.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists/administration & dosage , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Clonidine/administration & dosage , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Chronic Pain/psychology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Inactivation, Metabolic/physiology , Injections, Spinal , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness Index , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/etiology , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/psychology
2.
Case Rep Anesthesiol ; 2012: 407539, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22957278

ABSTRACT

A 52-year-old female presented with idiopathic stocking-glove neuropathy. She underwent a series of right and left stellate ganglion blocks with ropivacaine and clonidine, followed by lumbar sympathetic blocks. This resulted in complete symptom relief for two weeks. These procedures were repeated after a two-month interval; at that time she was still experiencing partial relief from the first series. She again remained completely pain free for several weeks following the injections. As the pain partially returned, daily oral clonidine was initiated and resulted in almost complete cessation of her symptoms, which persisted at a three-month follow-up examination.

3.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 12(1): 7-13, 2008 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18417017

ABSTRACT

The use of neurolytic blockade is a staple in the management of cancer pain. However, the data on neurolysis for chronic pain are plagued by inconsistencies in patient selection, diagnostic criteria, technical standards, and outcome measures. No one neurolytic agent or technique has been proven superior to another. Current evidence suggests that patients with pain of malignant origin may benefit from a variety of neurolytic techniques, as the benefit of documented short-term pain relief may outweigh risk at the end of life. In the absence of compelling data suggesting low-risk long-term efficacy, neurolysis for chronic benign pain should be cautiously considered, in most cases, only after failure of aggressive multidisciplinary management.


Subject(s)
Nerve Block/methods , Pain Management , Chronic Disease , Denervation/methods , Ganglionectomy/methods , Humans , Pain/drug therapy , Pain/surgery , Sympathectomy
4.
Exp Mol Pathol ; 79(1): 23-32, 2005 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15878512

ABSTRACT

The serine protease inhibitor (serpin) protein C inhibitor (PCI) has been found in the prostate and possibly is a marker to distinguish normal prostate, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and prostate cancer. In this study, we assessed PCI expression in normal, hyperplastic, and malignant prostatic tissues, prostate cancer cell lines, and the CWR22 prostate cancer xenograft model that allowed us to study PCI expression and its regulation in response to androgens. By Northern blot, immunohistochemistry, and in situ hybridization, we found that PCI was expressed in both benign and malignant prostate tissues. Protein C inhibitor was expressed in both androgen-independent (PC-3) and androgen-dependent (LNCaP) prostate cancer cell lines. Furthermore, PCI was detected in all CWR22 tumor samples (androgen dependent, 6 days post-castration, 12 days post-castration followed by 72 h of testosterone treatment, and recurrent CWR22 tumor), although expression of the mature forms of both prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and its homolog, kallikrein 2 (hK2), was clearly androgen-dependent. These results suggest that PCI expression is not regulated by androgens and that PCI is unlikely to be a tumor suppressor gene, but also that PCI may be involved in regulating key serine proteases involved in metastatic prostate disease.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Protein C Inhibitor/biosynthesis , Animals , Blotting, Northern , Cell Line, Tumor , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , In Situ Hybridization , Male , Mice , Mice, Nude , Neoplasm Transplantation , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Transplantation, Heterologous
5.
J Perinatol ; 22(2): 125-32, 2002 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11896517

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Develop a clinical risk score to screen for antenatal bacterial vaginosis (BV), irrespective of symptoms. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study of 913 pregnant women with last menstrual periods between January 30, 1995 and February 22, 1997. BV was evaluated by Nugent-scored vaginal smears (scores of 7 to 10 considered positive) between 24 and 29 weeks' gestation. Forty-four potential risk factors were assessed. RESULTS: 17.8% of women had BV, of whom 22% were screened for BV by the usual care provider. Logistic regression-adjusted analyses found six predictors: vaginal pH>4.5 (OR=11.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] [7.8, 17.2]); black race (OR=1.9, 95% CI [1.3, 2.8]); condom use during pregnancy (OR=1.6, 95% CI [1.0, 2.5]); antenatal BV (OR=1.7, 95% CI [1.0, 2.8]); absence of sperm on smear (OR=1.7, 95% CI [1.0, 2.9]); and no history of sexually transmitted diseases (OR=1.6, 95% CI [1.0, 2.5]). Risk score weights were 5 for an elevated vaginal pH and 1 otherwise. The sensitivity and specificity of screening women with scores > or =4 were both 77%; this would involve screening 33% of patients. CONCLUSION: Approximately 80% of our BV cases were asymptomatic, emphasizing the need for objective risk assessment. Using six factors, clinicians can identify pregnant women at risk for BV.


Subject(s)
Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Gram-Positive Bacteria/isolation & purification , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Outcome , Vaginosis, Bacterial/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Cohort Studies , Confidence Intervals , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Incidence , Logistic Models , Odds Ratio , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Risk Factors , Vaginal Smears , Vaginosis, Bacterial/diagnosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...