ABSTRACT
Introduction Preoperative marking is an essential safety practice to prevent "never" events, including wrong site surgery. Moreover, the Joint Commission regulations of the Universal Protocol require that patients be marked to indicate the operative site. Marking typically occurs with a pen or marker, which may be disposable or reusable. Previous studies have demonstrated that methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can survive in the dark, moist, capped environment of the marking pen and thus could plausibly be a nidus for transmission from patient to patient. The Joint Commission has established no increased risk of postoperative infection with these markings. With this study, we aimed to determine the colonization of surgical marking pens in the plastic surgery population. Methods Two marking pens from five different attending plastic surgeons at a single institution were cultured in standard fashion for aerobic and anaerobic growth. All pens were used repeatedly in office settings for performing patient markings. Those same ten marking pens were then used to mark incision sites on mock patients. Standard povidone-iodine prepping was then performed in a paint-only fashion over the skin markings, and cultures were again taken. A control group consisted of cultures from five sterile pens from the operating room. Each sterile pen was opened, uncapped, and then swabbed. All twenty-five cultures were analyzed in the hospital laboratory in a blinded fashion. Results The five control pens revealed no bacterial growth. Of the 10 direct pen cultures, two samples grew coagulase-negative staphylococci and one culture contained Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The 10-patient marked and prepped specimens showed eight negative cultures and two with coagulase-negative staphylococci. Although Pseudomonas was detected on standard pen culture, no pseudomonal growth was present in any of the samples after patient marking and prepping with povidone-iodine. Conclusions Our findings reaffirm that marking pens may be vehicles for bacterial transmission and expand upon previous studies by describing the presence of bacterial colonization on marking pens even after surgical site preparation with povidone-iodine.
ABSTRACT
Siliconoma-induced hypercalcemia is a rare complication of siliconoma, occurring secondary to a foreign body granulomatous process induced by the introduction of silicone into soft tissue. This is a case report of a woman presenting with sequelae of illicit silicone injections performed in an unknown woman's basement in Florida 20 years before presentation. A 39-year-old woman presented with a 2-month history of 20-pound weight loss, malaise, and intractable vomiting with a remote history of unregulated cosmetic injections to the bilateral gluteal and thigh regions. Her laboratory studies were consistent with severe hypercalcemia secondary to a foreign body granulomatous process. Initially, she was medically managed, with mild improvements in her symptomatic hypercalcemia and later underwent palliative debridement with siliconoma removal. Postoperatively, her course was complicated by delayed wound healing and graft failure, but the surgical defect was later closed successfully with split-thickness skin grafting after months of wound care. Although the procedure was not intended to treat her hypercalcemia, there were significant improvements in serum and ionized calcium in the months following her procedure. Severe hypercalcemia in the context of previous unregulated cosmetic injections or possible silicone implant rupture should prompt consideration of siliconoma-induced hypercalcemia as the underlying etiology. In addition to the established utility of IV fluids, bisphosphonates, and glucocorticoids, there may also be a role for surgical intervention in the management of this unique patient population's hypercalcemia.
