ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The ACGME mandates that residency programs provide training related to high value care (HVC). The purpose of this study was to explore HVC education in general surgery residency programs. METHODS: An electronic survey was distributed to general surgery residents in geographically diverse programs. RESULTS: The response rate was 29% (181/619). Residents reported various HVC components in their curricula. Less than half felt HVC is very important for their future practice (44%) and only 15% felt confident they could lead a QI initiative in practice. Only 20% of residents reported participating in a root cause analysis and less than one-third of residents (30%) were frequently exposed to cost considerations. CONCLUSION: Few residents feel prepared to lead quality improvement initiatives, have participated in patient safety processes, or are aware of patients' costs of care. This underscores the need for improved scope and quality of HVC education and establishment of formal curricula.
Subject(s)
General Surgery/education , Internship and Residency/organization & administration , Needs Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Patient Care/standards , Quality Improvement , Adult , Curriculum/standards , Curriculum/statistics & numerical data , Female , General Surgery/economics , General Surgery/standards , General Surgery/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Costs , Humans , Internship and Residency/standards , Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical data , Male , Patient Care/economics , Patient Safety/economics , Patient Safety/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Academic institutions have increasingly focused on educating physicians and surgeons in concepts of value-based care, including quality improvement (QI). The extent to which QI curricular competencies are addressed in specialty surgical residency training is unclear. METHODS: A survey instrument was developed by content experts and sent to Vascular Surgery and Urology residents electronically. Descriptive statistics and bivariate associations were calculated using StataMP 13.1. RESULTS: Vascular Surgery and Urology residents reported exposure to similar types of QI curriculum. Fewer than half of residents reported achieving targets for graduation (Vascular 31%, Urology 42%) related to QI, and few residents in either group felt very well-prepared to lead a QI initiative (Vascular 13%, Urology 8%). CONCLUSION: QI education in surgical specialty training amongst Vascular Surgery and Urology residencies is similar and insufficient. Surgical specialties may benefit from collaborative efforts to improve the quality of QI education.
