Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Drug Investig ; 43(4): 299-306, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37012527

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tralokinumab, the first fully human monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to interleukin-13, was safe and effective for treating atopic dermatitis (AD) in clinical trials, but real-life experience is still limited. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tralokinumab in severe AD in a real-life multicenter prospective cohort. METHODS: Adult patients with severe AD were enrolled between January 2022 and July 2022 and received tralokinumab subcutaneously for 16 weeks. Objective and subjective scores were collected at baseline, weeks 6 and 16. Adverse events were reported throughout the study. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were included. An improvement of at least 75% on the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75) was achieved in 66.7% of patients at week 16. The median objective and subjective scores at week 16 were significantly (p < 0.001) lower than those at baseline. Combination with cyclosporine was sometimes necessary at the beginning of treatment, and addition of upadacitinib was required for some patients with very severe disease during the treatment. The most frequent adverse events were flares of eczema (23.8%) and reactions at injection site (19.0%). No cases of conjunctivitis were reported. Four patients (19.0%) discontinued treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Tralokinumab is an effective first-line biotherapy for severe AD. However, therapeutic response may be progressive. Safety data were reassuring. Atopic dermatitis flares or reactions at the injection site may lead to discontinuation of treatment. A history of conjunctivitis on dupilumab is not a contraindication to the initiation of tralokinumab.


Subject(s)
Conjunctivitis , Dermatitis, Atopic , Eczema , Humans , Adult , Prospective Studies , Dermatitis, Atopic/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , Injections, Subcutaneous , Double-Blind Method , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Severity of Illness Index , Conjunctivitis/chemically induced , Conjunctivitis/drug therapy , Eczema/chemically induced , Eczema/drug therapy
2.
Contact Dermatitis ; 85(6): 643-649, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34387868

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the 2010s an epidemic of allergic contact dermatitis to methylisothiazolinone (MI) occurred in Europe. European authorities banned the use of methylisothiazolinone in leave-on cosmetics in 2017 and limited its use in rinse-off products in 2018. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the sensitization rate to MI in Belgium between January 2014 and December 2019, and to assess cosensitizations to octylisothiazolinone (OIT) and benzisothiazolinone (BIT) in MI-sensitized patients. METHODS: A retrospective study of patch test results with MI, OIT, and BIT observed in patients attending five Belgian hospitals. RESULTS: Overall, 560 of 10 029 patients (5.58%) had a positive patch test reaction to MI, and its sensitization rate decreased from 7.9% in 2014 to 3.1% in 2019. Rinse-off cosmetics, paints, and detergents were the most prevalent sensitization sources in recent years. Simultaneous reactions readily occurred to OIT, and, surprisingly, and increasingly, also to BIT. CONCLUSIONS: Contact allergy to MI in Belgium has reached a pre-epidemic level, reflecting the impact of recent regulatory measures. Leave-on cosmetics, in contrast to rinse-off products, have almost disappeared as sensitization sources in Europe. Paints and detergents also remain problematic. The remarkably high number of patients (co)sensitized to BIT should be a focus of future research.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Thiazoles/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Belgium/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cosmetics/adverse effects , Detergents/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Paint/adverse effects , Patch Tests , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
5.
Contact Dermatitis ; 71(1): 41-8, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24815516

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The rate of contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis caused by methylisothiazolinone (MI) is dramatically increasing throughout Europe. OBJECTIVES: To report on methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI)/MI and MI allergy in Belgium. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2010 and December 2012, the medical charts of 6599 patients of the Belgian Contact and Environmental Dermatitis Group were retrospectively reviewed for MCI/MI and MI sensitization by use of a standardized questionnaire. Available data on sensitization in 2081 patients tested in 2013 were also included. RESULTS: In 2012, the sensitization rate for MCI/MI had increased to 4.5% and that for MI to 6.0%; the latter showed a further increase to 7.2% in 2013. The people mainly affected were women with a median age of 49 years with hand and/or facial dermatitis, most often resulting from the use of cosmetics. Simultaneous reactions to octylisothiazolinone were observed. CONCLUSION: A dramatic increase in the rate of contact allergy caused by MI in cosmetics is occurring in Belgium. Notwithstanding the recent recommendation to discontinue the use of MI in leave-on cosmetics, safer use concentrations should also be determined for rinse-off products. Close monitoring of MI sensitization in the near future will be necessary, and the highest test concentrations reported for MI and MCI/MI should be included in the baseline series.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Preservatives, Pharmaceutical/adverse effects , Thiazoles/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Belgium/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cosmetics/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Female , Household Products/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
6.
Eur J Dermatol ; 24(1): 15-22, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24566237

ABSTRACT

This study has two purposes:--to know whether the European standard series is still the key reference when it comes to contact dermatitis, i.e., are its components still the most frequently involved allergens in contact dermatitis nowadays?--to assess the results of the European standard series among French and Belgian dermatologists/allergists as, so far, most of them have failed to provide statistical data within the European community of allergists/dermatologists. 18 participants from 2 dermatology and allergy centres in Belgium and 11 centres in France collected their results from 3,073 patients tested in 2011. They assessed the relevance of some tests as well as that of the standard series and additional series to establish an etiological diagnosis of contact dermatitis. These results, together with the history of the European standard series, have shown that some allergens are obsolete and that others should be included in a new standard series for which we are making a few suggestions.


Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Dermatitis, Contact/diagnosis , Skin Tests/standards , Europe , Humans , Reference Standards
7.
Contact Dermatitis ; 62(6): 349-54, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20557341

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previously, a quantitative risk assessment suggested there was no risk of induction of fragrance allergy from minor residues of fragrance chemicals on washed fabrics. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether there was any risk of the elicitation of contact allergy from fragrance chemical residues on fabric in individuals who were already sensitized. METHODS: Thirty-six subjects with a positive patch test to isoeugenol (n = 19) or hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (n = 17) were recruited. Dose-response and fabric patch tests were performed, respectively, with filter paper and a cotton sample loaded with fragrance in ethanol-diethylphthalate (DEP) and applied in a Finn Chamber or a Hill Top Chamber. RESULTS: Only two subjects reacted to an isoeugenol patch test concentration of 0.01% (>20x the estimated likely skin exposure level), none reacted to lower concentrations. Of 36 subjects, 18 reacted to the fabric patch treated with ethanol-DEP vehicle alone and 20 to the fragrance-chemical-treated fabric patch. These were only minor non-specific skin reactions. They were also quite evenly distributed between the two fragrance chemical allergic groups. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the examples studied, fragrance chemical residues present on fabric do not appear to present a risk of the elicitation of immediate or delayed allergic skin reactions on individuals already sensitized.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Detergents/adverse effects , Hypersensitivity, Delayed/etiology , Perfume/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Aldehydes/adverse effects , Aldehydes/analysis , Clothing , Cyclohexenes/adverse effects , Cyclohexenes/analysis , Detergents/chemistry , Eugenol/adverse effects , Eugenol/analogs & derivatives , Eugenol/analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Perfume/analysis , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...