Availability and stock-outs of paediatric antiretroviral treatment formulations at health facilities in Kenya and Uganda.

INTRODUCTION: The large number of deaths among children with HIV is driven by poor antiretroviral treatment (ART) coverage among this cohort. The aim of the study was to assess the availability and stock-outs of paediatric and adult ART formulations in Kenya and Uganda across various regions and types of health facilities. METHODS: A survey on availability and stock-outs of paediatric ART at health facilities was adapted from the standardized Health Action International-WHO Medicine Availability Monitoring Tool. All preferred and limited-use formulations, and three phased-out formulations according to the 2021 WHO optimal formulary list were included in the survey, as well as a selection of adult ART formulations suitable for older children, adolescents, and adults. Availability data were collected in June-July 2022 and stock-out data were obtained over the previous year from randomly selected public and private-not-for-profit (PNFP) facilities registered to dispense paediatric ART across six districts per country. All data were analysed descriptively. RESULTS: In total, 144 health facilities were included (72 per country); 110 were public and 34 PNFP facilities. Overall availabilities of preferred paediatric ART formulations were 52.2% and 63.5% in Kenya and Uganda, respectively, with dolutegravir (DTG) 10 mg dispersible tablets being available in 70.2% and 77.4% of facilities, respectively, and abacavir/lamivudine dispersible tablets in 89.8% and 98.2% of facilities. Of note, availability of both formulations was low (37.5% and 62.5%, respectively) in Kenyan PNFP facilities. Overall availabilities of paediatric limited-use products were 1.1% in Kenya and 1.9% in Uganda. At least one stock-out of a preferred paediatric ART formulation was reported in 40.0% of Kenyan and 74.7% of Ugandan facilities. Nevirapine solution stock-outs were reported in 43.1% of Ugandan facilities, while alternative formulations for postnatal HIV prophylaxis were not available. CONCLUSIONS: Recommended DTG-based first-line ART for children across all ages was reasonably available at health facilities in Kenya and Uganda, with the exception of Kenyan PNFP facilities. Availability of paediatric ART formulations on the limited-use list was extremely low across both countries. Stock-outs were reported regularly, with the high number of reported stock-outs of neonatal ART formulations in Uganda being most concerning.

Twice-Daily Dosing of Dolutegravir in Infants on Rifampicin Treatment: A Pharmacokinetic Substudy of the EMPIRICAL Trial.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated dolutegravir pharmacokinetics in infants with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) receiving dolutegravir twice daily (BID) with rifampicin-based tuberculosis (TB) treatment compared with once daily (OD) without rifampicin. METHODS: Infants with HIV aged 1-12 months, weighing ≥3 kg, and receiving dolutegravir BID with rifampicin or OD without rifampicin were eligible. Six blood samples were taken over 12 (BID) or 24 hours (OD). Dolutegravir pharmacokinetic parameters, HIV viral load (VL) data, and adverse events (AEs) were reported. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of 30 enrolled infants had evaluable pharmacokinetic curves. The median (interquartile range) age was 7.1 months (6.1-9.9), weight was 6.3 kg (5.6-7.2), 21 (78%) received rifampicin, and 11 (41%) were female. Geometric mean ratios comparing dolutegravir BID with rifampicin versus OD without rifampicin were area under curve (AUC)0-24h 0.91 (95% confidence interval, .59-1.42), Ctrough 0.95 (0.57-1.59), Cmax 0.87 (0.57-1.33). One infant (5%) receiving rifampicin versus none without rifampicin had dolutegravir Ctrough <0.32 mg/L, and none had Ctrough <0.064 mg/L. The dolutegravir metabolic ratio (dolutegravir-glucuronide AUC/dolutegravir AUC) was 2.3-fold higher in combination with rifampicin versus without rifampicin. Five of 82 reported AEs were possibly related to rifampicin or dolutegravir and resolved without treatment discontinuation. Upon TB treatment completion, HIV viral load was <1000 copies/mL in 76% and 100% of infants and undetectable in 35% and 20% of infants with and without rifampicin, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Dolutegravir BID in infants receiving rifampicin resulted in adequate dolutegravir exposure, supporting this treatment approach for infants with HIV-TB coinfection.

First-Line Antituberculosis Drug Concentrations in Infants With HIV and a History of Recent Admission With Severe Pneumonia.

Optimal antituberculosis therapy is essential for favorable clinical outcomes. Peak plasma concentrations of first-line antituberculosis drugs in infants with living HIV receiving WHO-recommended dosing were low compared with reference values for adults, supporting studies on increased doses of first-line TB drugs in infants.

Lamivudine and Emtricitabine Dosing Proposal for Children with HIV and Chronic Kidney Disease, Supported by Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling.

Dose recommendations for lamivudine or emtricitabine in children with HIV and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are absent or not supported by clinical data. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models have the potential to facilitate dose selection for these drugs in this population. Existing lamivudine and emtricitabine compound models in Simcyp® (v21) were verified in adult populations with and without CKD and in non-CKD paediatric populations. We developed paediatric CKD population models reflecting subjects with a reduced glomerular filtration and tubular secretion, based on extrapolation from adult CKD population models. These models were verified using ganciclovir as a surrogate compound. Then, lamivudine and emtricitabine dosing strategies were simulated in virtual paediatric CKD populations. The compound and paediatric CKD population models were verified successfully (prediction error within 0.5- to 2-fold). The mean AUC ratios in children (GFR-adjusted dose in CKD population/standard dose in population with normal kidney function) were 1.15 and 1.23 for lamivudine, and 1.20 and 1.30 for emtricitabine, with grade-3- and -4-stage CKD, respectively. With the developed paediatric CKD population PBPK models, GFR-adjusted lamivudine and emtricitabine dosages in children with CKD resulted in adequate drug exposure, supporting paediatric GFR-adjusted dosing. Clinical studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Brief Report: Suboptimal Lopinavir Exposure in Infants on Rifampicin Treatment Receiving Double-dosed or Semisuperboosted Lopinavir/Ritonavir: Time for a Change.

BACKGROUND: Although super-boosted lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r; ratio 4:4 instead of 4:1) is recommended for infants living with HIV and receiving concomitant rifampicin, in clinical practice, many different LPV/r dosing strategies are applied due to poor availability of pediatric separate ritonavir formulations needed to superboost. We evaluated LPV pharmacokinetics in infants with HIV receiving LPV/r dosed according to local guidelines in various sub-Saharan African countries with or without rifampicin-based tuberculosis (TB) treatment. METHODS: This was a 2-arm pharmacokinetic substudy nested within the EMPIRICAL trial (#NCT03915366). Infants aged 1-12 months recruited into the main study were administered LPV/r according to local guidelines and drug availability either with or without rifampicin-based TB treatment; during rifampicin cotreatment, they received double-dosed (ratio 8:2) or semisuperboosted LPV/r (adding a ritonavir 100 mg crushed tablet to the evening LPV/r dose). Six blood samples were taken over 12 hours after intake of LPV/r. RESULTS: In total, 14/16 included infants had evaluable pharmacokinetic curves; 9/14 had rifampicin cotreatment (5 received double-dosed and 4 semisuperboosted LPV/r). The median (IQR) age was 6.4 months (5.4-9.8), weight 6.0 kg (5.2-6.8), and 10/14 were male. Of those receiving rifampicin, 6/9 infants (67%) had LPV Ctrough <1.0 mg/L compared with 1/5 (20%) in the control arm. LPV apparent oral clearance was 3.3-fold higher for infants receiving rifampicin. CONCLUSION: Double-dosed or semisuperboosted LPV/r for infants aged 1-12 months receiving rifampicin resulted in substantial proportions of subtherapeutic LPV levels. There is an urgent need for data on alternative antiretroviral regimens in infants with HIV/TB coinfection, including twice-daily dolutegravir.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between raltegravir and rifampicin in an infant with HIV exposed to active TB: a case report.

We report a case of an infant with HIV receiving raltegravir granules for oral suspension and rifampicin-based TB prophylaxis. Raltegravir trough levels remained subtherapeutic and viral load increased during concurrent rifampicin therapy despite using double-dosed raltegravir. Even after rifampicin therapy, a higher dose was needed. This highlights the importance of therapeutic drug monitoring and dose adjustments of raltegravir in infants with rifampicin as comedication.

What babies need: accelerating access to current and novel antiretroviral drugs in neonates through pharmacokinetic studies.

Although 23 antiretroviral drugs are approved for use in adults, only six are approved by regulatory authorities for use in term neonates born to women with HIV, with even fewer options for preterm neonates. A major hurdle for approvals is the delay in the generation of pharmacokinetic and safety data for antiretrovirals in neonates. The median time between the year of approval from the US Food and Drug Administration of an antiretroviral agent for adults and the first publication date for pharmacokinetic data in neonates less than 4 weeks old is 8 years (range 2-23 years). In this Viewpoint, we address pharmacokinetic research gaps and priorities for current and novel antiretroviral use in neonates. We also consider the challenges and provide guidance on neonatal clinical pharmacology research on antiretroviral agents with the goal of stimulating research and expediting the availability of safe medications for the prevention and treatment of HIV in this vulnerable population.

Raltegravir-based Postnatal HIV Prophylaxis Therapy in a Neonate After in Utero Dolutegravir Exposure.

We present a case report of a neonate receiving raltegravir-based postnatal HIV prophylaxis after in utero dolutegravir exposure. High levels of raltegravir and dolutegravir can potentially cause bilirubin toxicity as they compete for albumin binding and follow the same metabolic pathway through UGT1A1. This case suggests delaying initiation of raltegravir-based postnatal prophylaxis by 24-48 hours after in utero dolutegravir exposure.

Dexamethasone is a dose-dependent perpetrator of drug-drug interactions: implications for use in people living with HIV.

Global use of dexamethasone in COVID-19 patients has revealed a poor understanding of the drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential of dexamethasone, particularly with antiretroviral agents (ARVs). Dexamethasone is both a substrate and a dose-dependent inducer of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4). As many ARVs are substrates and/or inhibitors or inducers of CYP3A4, there is concern about DDIs with dexamethasone either as a perpetrator or a victim. Assessment of DDIs that involve dexamethasone is complex as dexamethasone is used at a range of daily doses (generally 0.5 up to 40 mg) and a treatment course can be short, long, or intermittent. Moreover, DDIs with dexamethasone have been evaluated only for a limited number of drugs. Here, we summarize the available in vitro and in vivo data on the interaction potential of dexamethasone and provide recommendations for the management of DDIs with ARVs, considering various dexamethasone dosages and treatment durations.

Pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral and tuberculosis drugs in children with HIV/TB co-infection: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Management of concomitant use of ART and TB drugs is difficult because of the many drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between the medications. This systematic review provides an overview of the current state of knowledge about the pharmacokinetics (PK) of ART and TB treatment in children with HIV/TB co-infection, and identifies knowledge gaps. METHODS: We searched Embase and PubMed, and systematically searched abstract books of relevant conferences, following PRISMA guidelines. Studies not reporting PK parameters, investigating medicines that are not available any longer or not including children with HIV/TB co-infection were excluded. All studies were assessed for quality. RESULTS: In total, 47 studies met the inclusion criteria. No dose adjustments are necessary for efavirenz during concomitant first-line TB treatment use, but intersubject PK variability was high, especially in children <3 years of age. Super-boosted lopinavir/ritonavir (ratio 1:1) resulted in adequate lopinavir trough concentrations during rifampicin co-administration. Double-dosed raltegravir can be given with rifampicin in children >4 weeks old as well as twice-daily dolutegravir (instead of once daily) in children older than 6 years. Exposure to some TB drugs (ethambutol and rifampicin) was reduced in the setting of HIV infection, regardless of ART use. Only limited PK data of second-line TB drugs with ART in children who are HIV infected have been published. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas integrase inhibitors seem favourable in older children, there are limited options for ART in young children (<3 years) receiving rifampicin-based TB therapy. The PK of TB drugs in HIV-infected children warrants further research.

Assessing the impact of law enforcement to reduce over-the-counter (OTC) sales of antibiotics in low- and middle-income countries; a systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: Many low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) are moving towards enforcing prescription-only access to antibiotics. This systematic literature review aims to assess the interventions used to enforce existing legislation prohibiting over-the-counter (OTC) sales of antibiotics in LMICs, their impact and examine the methods chosen for impact measurement including their strengths and weaknesses. METHODS: Both PubMed and Embase were systematically searched for studies reporting on impact measurement in moving towards prescription only access to antibiotics in LMICs. The PRISMA methodological review framework was used to ensure systematic data collection and analysis of literature. Narrative data synthesis was used due to heterogeneity of study designs. RESULTS: In total, 15 studies were included that assessed policy impact in 10 different countries. Strategies employed to enforce regulations prohibiting OTC sales of systemic antibiotics included retention of prescriptions for antibiotics by pharmacies, government inspections, engaging pharmacists in the design of interventions, media campaigns for the general public and educational activities for health care workers. A variety of outcomes was used to assess the policy impact; changes in antimicrobial resistance rates, changes in levels of antibiotic use, changes in trends of antibiotic use, changes in OTC supply of antibiotics, and changes in reported practices and knowledge of pharmacists, medicine sellers and the general public. Differences in methodological approaches and outcome assessment made it difficult to compare the effectiveness of law enforcement activities. Most effective appeared to be multifaceted approaches that involved all stakeholders. Monitoring of the impact on total sales of antibiotics by means of an interrupted time series (ITS) analysis and analysis of pharmacies selling antibiotics OTC using mystery clients were the methodologically strongest designs used. CONCLUSIONS: The published literature describing activities to enforce prescription-only access to antibiotics in LMICs is sparse and offers limited guidance. Most likely to be effective are comprehensive multifaceted interventions targeting all stakeholders with regular reinforcement of messages. Policy evaluation should be planned as part of implementation to assess the impact and effectiveness of intervention strategies and to identify targets for further activities. Robust study designs such as ITS analyses and mystery client surveys should be used to monitor policy impact.

The contribution of Ghanaian patients to the reporting of adverse drug reactions: a quantitative and qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is a major challenge for pharmacovigilance in Africa. This study sets out to assess the level of awareness of Ghanaian patients about ADRs and ADR-reporting and explores how different patients in Ghana recognize an ADR and the steps they take when they experience an ADR. METHODS: This was a two-part study consisting of a survey to quantify the awareness of Ghanaian patients on ADRs and ADR-reporting, and in-depth interviews to explore how patients recognize an ADR and the steps they take thereafter. Participants were selected from 28 health care facilities (HCF) in rural and urban areas in 4 out of the 10 administrative regions of Ghana. Chi-square tests were used to examine associations between demographic variables and i) awareness of ADRs and ADR-reporting, ii) ADR experience and iii) awareness of the Ghana Food and Drug Authority (Ghana-FDA) and its patient reporting system (PRS). Only participants that indicated they experienced an ADR were included for the in-depth interviews. Data was investigated for participants' awareness of ADRs, ADR reporting and steps taken when they experience ADRs. RESULTS: Of the total 572 participants enrolled in the study, 14% indicated they were unaware of ADRs and were excluded. Of the remaining 491 participants, 38% had experienced an ADR, of which 67% reported the ADR, 68% of them reported it to a doctor. Only 3% of the 491 participants were aware of the Ghana-FDA's PRS. The interview phase consisted of 33 patients who had experienced an ADR. Three key findings from the interview phase were; most participants recognized an ADR themselves, the symptoms of the ADR were the most mentioned reason for reporting and participants experienced a wide variety of obstacles in ADR-reporting. CONCLUSIONS: Most Ghanaian patients appear unaware of or unable/unwilling to use formal national channels for ADR reporting like the Ghana-FDA PRS. Motivation for ADR reporting appeared mainly personal and not communal. These findings warrant further attention in order to increase patient reporting of ADRs.