Extensive genomic analysis in patients with KRAS-mutated solid tumors shows high frequencies of concurrent alterations and potential targets but has limited clinical impact.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the distribution and frequency of concurrent alterations in different cancers across KRAS subtypes and in different KRAS subtypes across cancers, and to identify potentially actionable targets and patients who received targeted treatment matched to their genomic profile (GP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this descriptive and single-center study, we included 188 patients with solid tumors harboring KRAS mutations in codon 12, 13, 61, 117, or 146, referred to the Phase 1 Unit, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark from mid-2016 to 2020. Genomic co-alterations were detected with whole-exome sequencing, RNA sequencing, SNP array, and mRNA expression array on fresh biopsies. The study is part of the Copenhagen Prospective Personalized Oncology study (NCT02290522). RESULTS: The majority of patients had colorectal cancer (60.1%), non-small cell lung cancer (11.2%), or pancreatic cancer (10.6%). Most tumors were KRAS-mutated in codon 12 or 13 (93.7%) including G12D (27.1%), G12V (26.6%), G12C (11.7%), and G13D (11.2%). A total of 175 different co-alterations were found, most frequently pathogenic APC and TP53 mutations (55.9% and 46.4%, respectively) and high expression of CEACAM5 (73.4%). Different cancers and KRAS subtypes showed different patterns of co-alterations, and 157 tumors (83.5%) had potentially actionable targets with varying evidence of targetability (assessed using ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets). Of the 188 patients included in the study, 15 (7.4%) received treatment matched to their GP (e.g., immunotherapy and synthetic lethality drugs), of whom one had objective partial response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. CONCLUSION: Performing extensive genomic analysis in patients with known KRAS-mutated solid tumors may contribute with information to the genomic landscape of cancers and identify targets for immunotherapy or synthetic lethality drugs, but currently appears to have overall limited clinical impact, as few patients received targeted therapy matched to their GP.

Exploratory analysis of eating- and physical activity-related outcomes from a randomized controlled trial for weight loss maintenance with exercise and liraglutide single or combination treatment.

Weight regain after weight loss remains a major challenge in obesity treatment and may involve alteration of eating and sedentary behavior after weight loss. In this randomized, controlled, double-blind trial, adults with obesity were randomized, in a 1:1:1:1 ratio stratified by sex and age group (<40 years and ≥40 years), to one-year weight loss maintenance with exercise, the GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide, or the combination, as compared with placebo, after low-calorie diet-induced weight loss. Primary outcome was change in body weight, which has been published. Here, we investigated the effects of weight loss maintenance with exercise, liraglutide, or the combination on weight loss-induced changes in the pre-specified explorative outcomes, eating and sedentary behavior in 130 participants who completed the trial according to the study protocol (exercise (n = 26), liraglutide (n = 36), combination (n = 29), and placebo (n = 39)). One year after weight loss, the placebo group had decreased postprandial appetite suppression score by 14%, and increased sedentary time by 31 min/day and regained weight. Liraglutide prevented the decrease in postprandial appetite suppression score compared with placebo (0% vs. -14%; P = 0.023) and maintained weight loss. Exercise after weight loss did not increase appetite or sedentary behavior compared with placebo, despite increased exercise energy expenditure and maintained weight loss. The combination of exercise and liraglutide increased cognitive restraint score (13% vs. -9%; P = 0.042), reflecting a conscious restriction of food intake, and decreased sedentary time by 41 min/day (-10 vs. 31 min/day; 95%CI, -82.3 to -0.2; P = 0.049) compared with placebo, which may have facilitated the additional weight loss. Targeting both eating and sedentary behavior could be the most effective for preventing weight regain.Trial registration: EudraCT number, 2015-005585-32; clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT04122716.