Mass-Casualty Training Exercise Using High-Fidelity Computerized Simulators and Involving Time and Resource Limitation.

PURPOSE: Training emergency department (ED) personnel in the care of victims of mass-casualty incidents (MCIs) is a highly challenging task requiring unique and innovative approaches. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively explore the value of high-fidelity simulators in an exercise that incorporates time and resource limitation as an optimal method of training health care personnel in mass-casualty care. METHODS: Mass-casualty injury patterns from an explosive blast event were simulated for 12 victims using high-fidelity computerized simulators (HFCS). Programmed outcomes, based on the nature of injuries and conduct of participants, ranged from successful resuscitation and survival to death. The training exercise was conducted five times with different teams of health care personnel (n = 42). The exercise involved limited time and resources such as blood, ventilators, and imaging capability. Medical team performance was observed and recorded. Following the exercise, participants completed a survey regarding their training satisfaction, quality of the exercise, and their prior experiences with MCI simulations. The Likert scale responses from the survey were evaluated using mean with 95% confidence interval, as well as median and inter-quartile range. For the categorical responses, the frequency, proportions, and associated 95% confidence interval were calculated. RESULTS: The mean rating on the quality of experiences related trainee survey questions (n = 42) was between 4.1 and 4.6 on a scale of 5.0. The mean ratings on a scale of 10.0 for quality, usefulness, and pertinence of the program were 9.2, 9.5, and 9.5, respectfully. One hundred percent of respondents believed that this type of exercise should be required for MCI training and would recommend this exercise to colleagues. The five medical team (n = 5) performances resulted in the number of deaths ranging from two (including the expectant victims) to six. Eighty percent of medical teams attempted to resuscitate the "expectant" infant and exhausted the O- blood supply. Sixty percent of medical teams depleted the supply of ventilators. Forty percent of medical teams treated "delayed" victims too early. CONCLUSION: A training exercise using HFCS for mass casualties and employing limited time and resources is described. This exercise is a preferred method of training among participating health care personnel.

Rhabdomyolysis as the Initial Presentation of SARS-CoV-2 in an Adolescent.

The novel coronavirus disease 2019, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, has created a global pandemic, with many cases affecting the elderly. However, children have been affected as well, with ∼2.4% to 3.7% of cases reported. This case is the first published case of an adolescent presenting with rhabdomyolysis as the first sign of novel coronavirus disease 2019, with extremely elevated creatinine kinase levels, approaching almost 400 000 U/L. This case adds to the growing body of literature of a variety of life-threatening manifestations associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection and highlights the importance of how prompt recognition of these unique presentations of the disease is important to mitigate complications.

Time and out-of-pocket costs associated with respiratory syncytial virus hospitalization of infants.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to quantify time spent plus out-of-pocket costs associated with confirmed respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) hospitalization of infants not prophylaxed against RSV. METHODS: A prospective survey was carried out at multiple tertiary care hospitals in the United States. PATIENTS: The patients consisted of a consecutive sample of infants <12 months, born between 33 and 35 weeks of gestation. One site also enrolled full-term infants hospitalized with confirmed RSV. Daily patient census identified eligible patients. Consenting caregivers of eligible subjects (n=84, 1 refusal) were interviewed on discharge day and by telephone approximately 30 days following discharge regarding time and out-of-pocket costs due to RSV. RESULTS: Total average out of pocket expenses were 643.69 US dollars (range 21-16,867 US dollars; SD 2,403 US dollars) for premature and 214.42 US dollars (range 6-827 US dollars; SD 218 US dollars) (P=.0158) for full-term subjects. Total average economic burden per admission was 4517.07 US dollars for premature and 2135.30 US dollars for full-term infants, including the value of lost productivity but excluding inpatient hospital and physician bills and lost income. Premature infants (n=48) had longer hospital stays (mean 6.9 days; SD 7.5 vs. 3.4 days; SD 2.6 days) (P=.001) with an associated mean total time spent by up to 5 adults of 281.7 hours (range 25-2819.7 hours; SD 465.8 hours) versus a mean of 139.7 hours (range 31.8-561.3 hours; SD 118.1 hours) for term infants (P=.109). Time and out-of-pocket costs continued after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: RSV hospitalization of infants is associated with substantial, previously unmeasured time and monetary losses. These losses continued following discharge. The economic burden on families and society appears heavier for infants born at 33 to 35 weeks of gestation than for full-term infants.

A method for identifying the financial burden of hospitalized infants on families.

OBJECTIVES: To describe a method for measuring the direct and indirect costs to families of infants hospitalized with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). METHODS: After pretesting and revising a questionnaire, a prospective survey was conducted in multiple tertiary-care hospitals with pediatric intensive care units. Eligible patients were infants less than 12 months old who had not received RSV prophylaxis and were hospitalized with a confirmed RSV infection. All English- and Spanish-speaking caregivers of eligible subjects were asked to participate in a face-to-face, structured interview on the day of hospital discharge regarding hospitalization-related direct and indirect costs. Thirty days later, caregivers were re-interviewed by telephone about their RSV-related costs during the elapsed month. The survey was initiated in February 2000 and continued through April 2001. RESULTS: In addition to the infants' parents, numerous adults visited 55% of hospitalized infants. In 17% of cases, nonparents missed work to visit the child. Volunteers watched siblings of 26% of the infants. Relying only on closed-ended questions about parents' costs during the hospitalization would have missed important information about child-care volunteers and types of expenses. Follow-up interviews revealed that RSV-related out-of-pocket expenses and missed work continued during the month following discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Survey instruments should be pretested with potentially eligible subjects. Open-ended questions are needed, because all costs cannot be anticipated. Respondents should be probed for details. This method revealed certain time and financial burdens during and after hospitalization that had not been previously reported in the literature.