A Systematic Scoping Review of Comparative Effectiveness Studies in Kidney Stone Disease.

OBJECTIVE: To review the status of comparative effectiveness studies for kidney stone disease with focus on study outcome, type, population, time trends, and patient-centered approaches. METHODS: A systematic scoping review was performed for articles published between January 1, 2005, and March 30, 2021, using keywords relevant to kidney stone disease. Studies published in English that compared two or more alternative methods for prevention, diagnosis, treatment, monitoring, or care delivery were included. Two reviewers independently reviewed abstracts and an arbitrator resolved discrepancies. Nine reviewers abstracted information from full-length studies. Descriptive statistics were summarized, and linear regression was performed to evaluate temporal trends of study characteristics. RESULTS: We reviewed 1773 abstracts and 707 full-length manuscripts focused on surgical intervention (440); medical expulsive therapy (MET) (152); analgesic control (80); and homeopathic, diagnostics, and/or prophylaxis (84). Randomized controlled trials were common across all outcome categories, including surgery (41.6%), MET (60.2%), analgesic control (81.3%), homeopathic (41.2%), diagnostic (47.6%), and prophylaxis (49.1%). Patient-reported outcomes were utilized in 71.7% and 95% of MET and analgesic control studies, respectively, but in the minority of all other study themes. Over time, meta-analyses and multicenter studies increased [P < .001]. CONCLUSION: Surgical and MET themes dominate published comparative literature in kidney stone disease. There is substantial variation in use of patient-reported outcomes across surgical themes. Multicentered studies and those generating higher level evidence have increased over time but opportunities exist to improve collaborative, high-quality, and patient-centered research in kidney stone disease.

Chronic opioid users with dysphagia are indistinguishable from symptomatic nonusers on functional lumen imaging probe evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Opioid-induced esophageal dysmotility (OIED) includes spastic esophageal motility disorders, increasingly recognized in the contemporary opioid epidemic. We assessed functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) findings in diagnosing OIED. METHODS: Symptomatic patients undergoing FLIP with no prior foregut surgery who completed validated questionnaires were identified and segregated into chronic opioid users and nonusers in this cohort study. Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) distensibility index (DI), EGJ diameter, and esophageal body contraction patterns were extracted. Symptom profiles were compared to FLIP findings between chronic opioid users and nonusers. Outcome was evaluated in a subset using the same validated questionnaires. RESULTS: Over the 18-months study period, of 116 patients (median age 62 years, 70.7% female), 33 (28.4%) were chronic opioid users, with median morphine milligram equivalent of 30 mg. While presenting symptoms were similar, chronic opioid users reported higher perceptive symptoms (p = 0.008) and worse quality of life (p = 0.01) compared to nonusers. Median DI trended lower in chronic opioid users (p = 0.08), with more retrograde repetitive contractions (p < 0.001) and less absent contractility (p = 0.007), but final FLIP diagnoses were similar compared to nonusers. There was no correlation between opioid dose and FLIP metrics. In the subset with follow-up, perceptive symptoms trended higher in chronic opioid users (p = 0.08), but symptom improvement following therapy was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Symptomatic chronic opioid users have FLIP diagnoses that are similar to nonusers, despite higher perceptive symptoms and worse quality of life. Dominant symptoms improve both in chronic opioid users and nonusers following treatment directed by FLIP.

Esophageal Dysfunction in Post-lung Transplant: An Enigma.

The prevalence of lung transplants has increased over the years, albeit with a low survival rate amongst all solid organ transplants, including liver and heart transplantation. Microaspiration is one of the primary mechanisms that has been implicated in the pathogenesis of lung injury following lung transplants. Of late, esophageal dysfunction such as gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal hypercontractility is often noted post-lung transplant. However, reflux is associated with chronic allograft lung injury such as bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, which is one of the predictors for long-term survival in this specialized population. Its role in acute lung injury post-lung transplant is still being explored. This review critically examines the salient points which provide the current understanding of the characteristics, pathophysiology, and implications of esophageal dysfunction following lung transplant.

Primary Pulmonary Vein Stenosis: A New Look at a Rare but Challenging Disease.

Primary pulmonary vein stenosis (PPVS) represents a rare but emerging, often progressive heterogeneous disease with high morbidity and mortality in the pediatric population. Although our understanding of PPVS disease has improved markedly in recent years, much remains unknown regarding disease pathogenesis, distinct disease phenotypes, and patient- and disease-related risk factors driving the unrelenting disease progression characteristic of PPVS. In the pediatric population, risk factors identified in the development of PPVS include an underlying congenital heart disease, prematurity and associated conditions, and an underlying genetic or congenital syndrome. Continued improvement in the survival of high-risk populations, coupled with ongoing advances in general PPVS awareness and diagnostic imaging technologies suggest that PPVS will be an increasingly prevalent disease affecting pediatric populations in the years to come. However, significant challenges persist in both the diagnosis and management of PPVS. Standardized definitions and risk stratification for PPVS are lacking. Furthermore, evidence-based guidelines for screening, monitoring, and treatment remain to be established. Given these limitations, significant practice variation in management approaches has emerged across centers, and contemporary outcomes for patients affected by PPVS remain guarded. To improve care and outcomes for PPVS patients, the development and implementation of universal definitions for disease and severity, as well as evidence-based guidelines for screening, monitoring, cardiorespiratory care, and indications for surgical intervention will be critical. In addition, collaboration across institutions will be paramount in the creation of regionalized referral centers as well as a comprehensive patient registry for those requiring pulmonary vein stenosis.