An overview of assessment and management of acute dental pain.

Dental care practitioners are often the first port of call for patients presenting with acute dental pain. Due to the increasing backlog of patients in the UK resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, it is expected that an increasing number of patients will present to dental care practitioners with acute dental problems. This article aims to provide an overview of common presentations of acute dental pain, the importance of thorough assessment and accurate diagnosis, and the management of such conditions.

An evaluation of patient informed consent for dental extractions.

Dental practitioners are well versed in informing patients of the risks and benefits associated with dental extractions. The purpose of this service evaluation was to determine whether patients understood and recalled information relevant to their planned oral surgery procedure, prior to second stage consent.A questionnaire was distributed to patients who were attending for their elective treatment appointment. This explored their ability to recall the planned intervention, the modality of treatment (local anaesthetic, intravenous sedation, or general anaesthetic), understanding of alternative treatment options and the risks associated with the procedure. Completed responses were received from 29 of the distributed questionnaires (response rate=58%). The majority of patients were not aware of the following risks with their procedure: pain, bleeding, bruising, swelling, infection, damage to adjacent structures.Despite a well-documented consent form and comprehensive discussion, we identified that patients may not comprehend or recollect the risks associated with their dental extraction. As dental professionals we have a duty to seek ways to facilitate patient understanding and maximise their autonomy.

Jaw metastases and the general dental practitioner.

Metastatic spread to the oral cavity is a rare entity, comprising 1% of oral malignancies. However, 25% of oral metastases are found to be the initial sign of metastatic spread; therefore, initial presentation in the oral cavity may indicate significant underlying disease. Common primary sites for men include the prostate, lung, kidney and liver. For women, it is the breast, kidney, colon and genital organs. General dental practitioners are in a unique position to identify and instigate rapid referrals as gatekeepers of primary care whereby patients commonly present to them with symptoms. This clinical review article aims to educate dental practitioners on appropriate recognition of oral metastatic pathology and referral to secondary care.

Orthodontic-related nerve injuries: a review and case series.

Trigeminal neuropathy secondary to orthodontic tooth movement is reported as a rare occurrence. Risk assessment is possible to prevent or immediately treat these injuries and clinicians should be aware of the risk factors. Increasingly, orthodontics is provided by non-specialists and orthodontic therapists. This paper presents cases and a review of orthodontic-related nerve injuries, where early diagnosis of orthodontic nerve injuries was misdiagnosed, preventing early or immediate treatment that would have likely optimised neural recovery and prevented permanent sensory neuropathic pain in these patients. We present two cases of trigeminal neuropathy following orthodontic tooth movement that highlight some key issues relating to improving pre-orthodontic risk assessment during treatment planning and early identification of developing neuropathy requiring urgent cessation/reversal of orthodontic treatment. The cases presented demonstrate the importance of thorough pre-orthodontic assessment before treatment planning. Traditionally, two-dimensional imaging such as panoramic and periapical radiographs have been the gold standard for predicting the relationship of the dentition to the mandibular canal. However, cone beam computed tomography imaging is now accepted as providing a more accurate image of the position of the teeth in relation to vital structures, such as neurovascular supply.

Endodontic microsurgery. Part two: armamentarium and technique.

Modern endodontic microsurgery has a high reported success rate of up to 93.5%, making it a viable treatment option in the management of periapical disease when orthograde root treatment is not possible or inappropriate. This high success rate is intimately related to advanced techniques that have allowed practitioners to overcome historical barriers to the success seen in traditional surgical endodontics. When comparing traditional root-end surgery and endodontic microsurgery there are key differences when considering the flap design, access armamentarium, size of osteotomy, instruments used and root-end material. This paper highlights such key differences and advises practitioners on the techniques and instruments used to achieve high success rates, firmly establishing non-surgical endodontic treatment as an important treatment option in well-selected cases.

Endodontic microsurgery. Part one: diagnosis, patient selection and prognoses.

Historically, surgical endodontics has been viewed as a treatment of last resort, mainly due to poor outcomes as a result of limitations in materials and techniques. Contemporary techniques, modern materials and better visualisation have all led to an improvement in success rates, making endodontic microsurgery a valuable treatment option to certain patients. Such advances, however, are no substitute for skill in endodontic diagnosis and treatment planning, which can often prove challenging. A variety of tools are available to test for fractures and assess both periodontal and pulpal health. More advanced techniques such as cone beam computed tomography are often invaluable in pre-surgical assessment and diagnosis. Once an accurate diagnosis has been established, a favourable prognosis is explicitly linked to careful patient selection. Orthograde treatment, or retreatment, remains the gold standard for the majority of endodontic problems. However, there are a number of indications for surgery where orthograde treatment is either impossible, or less likely to be successful. It is paramount for any clinician undertaking endodontic surgery to have a detailed understanding of the local and systemic factors associated with successful treatment. Whilst there are few absolute medical contraindications, there are a number of conditions which may influence patient management and make treatment more challenging.