Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Radiography (Lond) ; 23(1): 25-31, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28290336

ABSTRACT

Mammography is used as a first-line investigation in the detection of breast cancer and imaging is required to be of optimal quality and achieved without adverse effects on the health of individuals. Repeated images come at a cost in terms of radiation dose, discomfort to clients and unnecessary financial burdens. No studies investigating mammography quality in Malta had been previously undertaken. Hence, this research aimed to investigate whether mammography is being performed at an acceptable level, through the investigation of reject rates. Quantitative methodology was used to collect data from eight participating mammography units, which were utilising screen film (SFM), computed radiography (CR) and direct digital mammography (DDM). Data relating to the total number of images performed, rejects and causes was prospectively collected over two weeks, resulting in a sample of 2291 images. All units were also asked to answer a questionnaire which provided other data that could be used for analysis. The national mammography reject rate was found to be 2.62%; within the 3% acceptable range. Individual rates' analysis revealed unacceptably high or low reject rates in some units. Positioning was the main reject cause. No significant difference in rejection was found between different types of mammography units or radiographers' experience. Alternatively, radiographers' qualifications, employment conditions and use of rejection criteria were proven to affect reject rates. Whilst on a national level, images are being rejected at an acceptable rate, individual units revealed suboptimal rates; at the cost of extra radiation, added discomfort and financial burden.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Diagnostic Errors/prevention & control , Diagnostic Errors/statistics & numerical data , Mammography/standards , Patient Positioning , Female , Humans , Malta , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Quality Control , Risk Factors
2.
Prof Nurse ; 14(7): 463-6, 1999 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10347526

ABSTRACT

Accurate monitoring of weight and height is a vital element of nutritional assessment. Specialist equipment may be required for older patients. Accuracy depends upon calibration and maintenance of equipment.


Subject(s)
Body Height , Body Weight , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital/standards , Geriatric Assessment , Nursing Assessment/methods , Nutrition Assessment , Aged , Humans , Nursing Audit
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...