Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(4): e239638, 2023 04 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37093601

ABSTRACT

Importance: The underuse of oral anticoagulation in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major issue that is not well understood. Objective: To understand the lack of anticoagulation by assessing the perceptions of patients with AF who are not receiving anticoagulation and their physician's about the risk of stroke and the benefits and risks of anticoagulation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included patients with nonvalvular AF and a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 2 or more (calculated as congestive heart failure, hypertension, age 75 years and older, diabetes, stroke or transient ischemic attack, vascular disease, age 65 to 74 years, and sex category) who were not receiving anticoagulation and were enrolled from 19 sites within the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence Registry (PINNACLE Registry) between January 18, 2017, and May 7, 2018. Data were collected from January 18, 2017, to September 30, 2019, and analyzed from April 2022 to March 2023. Exposure: Each patient enrolled in the study completed a survey, and their treating physician then conducted a clinical review of their care. Main Outcomes and Measures: Assessment of willingness for anticoagulation treatment and its appropriateness after central review by a panel of 4 cardiologists. Use of anticoagulation at 1 year follow-up was compared vs similar patients at other centers in the PINNACLE Registry. Results: Of the 817 patients enrolled, the median (IQR) age was 76.0 (69.0-83.0) years, 369 (45.2%) were women, and the median (IQR) CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.0 (3.0-6.0). The top 5 reasons physicians cited for no anticoagulation were low AF burden or successful rhythm control (278 [34.0%]), patient refusal (272 [33.3%]), perceived low risk of stroke (206 [25.2%]), fall risk (175 [21.4%]), and high bleeding risk (167 [20.4%]). After rereview, 221 physicians (27.1%) would reconsider prescribing oral anticoagulation as compared with 311 patients (38.1%), including 67 (24.6%) whose physician cited patient refusal. Of 647 patients (79.2%) adjudicated as appropriate or may be appropriate for anticoagulation, physicians would reconsider anticoagulation for only 177 patients (21.2%), while 527 patients (64.5%) would either agree to starting anticoagulation (311 [38.1%]) or were neutral (216 [27.3%]) to starting anticoagulation. Upon follow-up, 119 patients (14.6%) in the BOAT-AF study were prescribed anticoagulation, as compared with 55 879 of 387 975 similar patients (14.4%) at other centers in the PINNACLE Registry. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that patients with AF who are not receiving anticoagulation are more willing to consider anticoagulation than their physicians. These data emphasize the need to revisit any prior decision against anticoagulation in a shared decision-making manner.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Atrial Fibrillation , Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Aged, 80 and over , Treatment Outcome
2.
JAMA Pediatr ; 173(6): 604-605, 2019 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30933254
3.
Obstet Gynecol ; 131(3): 503-513, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29470326

ABSTRACT

Cesarean births and associated morbidity and mortality have reached near epidemic proportions. The National Partnership for Maternal Safety under the guidance of the Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care responded by developing a patient safety bundle to reduce the number of primary cesarean births. Safety bundles outline critical practices to implement in every maternity unit. This National Partnership for Maternity Safety bundle, as with other bundles, is organized into four domains: Readiness, Recognition and Prevention, Response, and Reporting and Systems Learning. Bundle components may be adapted to individual facilities, but standardization within an institution is advised. Evidence-based resources and recommendations are provided to assist implementation.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section/standards , Patient Care Bundles/methods , Patient Safety/standards , Prenatal Care/methods , Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Delivery, Obstetric/standards , Female , Humans , Patient Care Bundles/standards , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications/therapy , Prenatal Care/standards
4.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs ; 47(2): 214-226, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29478788

ABSTRACT

Cesarean births and associated morbidity and mortality have reached near epidemic proportions. The National Partnership for Maternal Safety under the guidance of the Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care responded by developing a patient safety bundle to reduce the number of primary cesarean births. Safety bundles outline critical practices to implement in every maternity unit. This National Partnership for Maternity Safety bundle, as with other bundles, is organized into four domains: Readiness, Recognition and Prevention, Response, and Reporting and Systems Learning. Bundle components may be adapted to individual facilities, but standardization within an institution is advised. Evidence-based resources and recommendations are provided to assist implementation.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Maternal Health , Patient Safety/standards , Pregnancy Outcome , Safety Management/organization & administration , Vaginal Birth after Cesarean/statistics & numerical data , Adult , California , Cesarean Section/methods , Consensus , Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Vaginal Birth after Cesarean/methods
5.
J Midwifery Womens Health ; 63(2): 235-244, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29471583

ABSTRACT

Cesarean births and associated morbidity and mortality have reached near epidemic proportions. The National Partnership for Maternal Safety under the guidance of the Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care responded by developing a patient safety bundle to reduce the number of primary cesarean births. Safety bundles outline critical practices to implement in every maternity unit. This National Partnership for Maternity Safety bundle, as with other bundles, is organized into four domains: Readiness, Recognition and Prevention, Response, and Reporting and Systems Learning. Bundle components may be adapted to individual facilities, but standardization within an institution is advised. Evidence-based resources and recommendations are provided to assist implementation.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section , Clinical Protocols/standards , Patient Safety , Pregnancy Complications , Consensus , Female , Hospitals , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intention , Pregnancy , Risk Assessment
6.
Anesth Analg ; 125(2): 540-547, 2017 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28696959

ABSTRACT

Complications arising from hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are among the leading causes of preventable severe maternal morbidity and mortality. Timely and appropriate treatment has the potential to significantly reduce hypertension-related complications. To assist health care providers in achieving this goal, this patient safety bundle provides guidance to coordinate and standardize the care provided to women with severe hypertension during pregnancy and the postpartum period. This is one of several patient safety bundles developed by multidisciplinary work groups of the National Partnership for Maternal Safety under the guidance of the Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care. These safety bundles outline critical clinical practices that should be implemented in every maternity care setting. Similar to other bundles that have been developed and promoted by the Partnership, the hypertension safety bundle is organized into four domains: Readiness, Recognition and Prevention, Response, and Reporting and Systems Learning. Although the bundle components may be adapted to meet the resources available in individual facilities, standardization within an institution is strongly encouraged. This commentary provides information to assist with bundle implementation.


Subject(s)
Eclampsia/diagnosis , Obstetrics/standards , Patient Safety/standards , Postpartum Hemorrhage/therapy , Postpartum Period , Pre-Eclampsia/diagnosis , Emergency Medicine , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Guidelines as Topic , Health Services Research , Humans , Hypertension/therapy , Obstetrics/organization & administration , Outpatients , Postpartum Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Risk Assessment , Triage , United States , Women's Health
7.
Obstet Gynecol ; 130(2): 347-357, 2017 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28697093

ABSTRACT

Complications arising from hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are among the leading causes of preventable severe maternal morbidity and mortality. Timely and appropriate treatment has the potential to significantly reduce hypertension-related complications. To assist health care providers in achieving this goal, this patient safety bundle provides guidance to coordinate and standardize the care provided to women with severe hypertension during pregnancy and the postpartum period. This is one of several patient safety bundles developed by multidisciplinary work groups of the National Partnership for Maternal Safety under the guidance of the Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care. These safety bundles outline critical clinical practices that should be implemented in every maternity care setting. Similar to other bundles that have been developed and promoted by the Partnership, the hypertension safety bundle is organized into four domains: Readiness, Recognition and Prevention, Response, and Reporting and Systems Learning. Although the bundle components may be adapted to meet the resources available in individual facilities, standardization within an institution is strongly encouraged. This commentary provides information to assist with bundle implementation.


Subject(s)
Consensus , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/therapy , Hypertension/therapy , Obstetrics/methods , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular/therapy , Puerperal Disorders/therapy , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Eclampsia/diagnosis , Eclampsia/therapy , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Humans , Hypertension/prevention & control , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/diagnosis , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/prevention & control , Obstetrics/education , Patient Education as Topic , Pre-Eclampsia/diagnosis , Pre-Eclampsia/therapy , Pregnancy , Puerperal Disorders/diagnosis , Puerperal Disorders/prevention & control , Triage/methods
8.
J Midwifery Womens Health ; 62(4): 493-501, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28697534

ABSTRACT

Complications arising from hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are among the leading causes of preventable severe maternal morbidity and mortality. Timely and appropriate treatment has the potential to significantly reduce hypertension-related complications. To assist health care providers in achieving this goal, this patient safety bundle provides guidance to coordinate and standardize the care provided to women with severe hypertension during pregnancy and the postpartum period. This is one of several patient safety bundles developed by multidisciplinary work groups of the National Partnership for Maternal Safety under the guidance of the Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care. These safety bundles outline critical clinical practices that should be implemented in every maternity care setting. Similar to other bundles that have been developed and promoted by the Partnership, the hypertension safety bundle is organized into four domains: Readiness, Recognition and Prevention, Response, and Reporting and Systems Learning. Although the bundle components may be adapted to meet the resources available in individual facilities, standardization within an institution is strongly encouraged. This commentary provides information to assist with bundle implementation.


Subject(s)
Consensus , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/therapy , Obstetrics/methods , Patient Safety , Postpartum Period , Eclampsia/therapy , Female , Humans , Obstetrics/standards , Postpartum Hemorrhage , Pre-Eclampsia/therapy , Pregnancy , Severity of Illness Index , Standard of Care
9.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs ; 46(5): 776-787, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28709727

ABSTRACT

Complications arising from hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are among the leading causes of preventable severe maternal morbidity and mortality. Timely and appropriate treatment has the potential to significantly reduce hypertension-related complications. To assist health care providers in achieving this goal, this patient safety bundle provides guidance to coordinate and standardize the care provided to women with severe hypertension during pregnancy and the postpartum period. This is one of several patient safety bundles developed by multidisciplinary work groups of the National Partnership for Maternal Safety under the guidance of the Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care. These safety bundles outline critical clinical practices that should be implemented in every maternity care setting. Similar to other bundles that have been developed and promoted by the Partnership, the hypertension safety bundle is organized into four domains: Readiness, Recognition and Prevention, Response, and Reporting and Systems Learning. Although the bundle components may be adapted to meet the resources available in individual facilities, standardization within an institution is strongly encouraged. This commentary provides information to assist with bundle implementation.


Subject(s)
Hypertension , Interdisciplinary Communication , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular , Puerperal Disorders , Consensus , Early Medical Intervention/methods , Female , Humans , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/therapy , Patient Care Management/methods , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular/therapy , Puerperal Disorders/diagnosis , Puerperal Disorders/therapy , Severity of Illness Index
10.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 33(4): 223-229, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26999582

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Almost 200,000 adolescents visit US emergency departments (EDs) yearly for conditions involving underage drinking but receive no follow-up referral. Other health risk behaviors resulting in sexually transmitted infections, car crashes, and assault-related injury are common among adolescents. A pediatric ED (PED) visit presents an opportunity to discuss and promote prevention. We report here on implementation of a new PED navigator/extender role, the Health Promotion Advocate (HPA). METHODS: Health Promotion Advocates surveyed patients to identify health risks, stresses, and needs. A positive screen triggered a brief conversation containing the following elements: permission to discuss risks/needs; exploration of context (a typical day in your life); brief feedback (information and norms); exploration of benefits and consequences of risk behaviors; assessment of readiness to change; calling up assets, instilling hope; discussing challenges of change; negotiating a menu of options and prescription for change; referrals to primary care, community resources; and treatment services as indicated. RESULTS: During 2009-2013, HPAs screened 2149 PED patients aged 14 to 21 years and referred 834 for an array of services (eg, primary care, mental health, insurance, personal safety, human immunodeficiency virus testing, general education diploma (GED), employment, housing, and food pantries) to address reported health risks; 785 screened positive for at-risk substance use (53% female, 36% without primary care). Among them, 636 received a brief intervention; 546 were referred to specialized substance abuse treatment. Two case studies are presented to illustrate the engagement and referral process. CONCLUSIONS: Health Promotion Advocates working as PED team members can extend PED services beyond the scope of the presenting complaint.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Health Promotion/methods , Adolescent , Adolescent Behavior , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Preventive Medicine , Risk-Taking , Young Adult
11.
Front Psychol ; 5: 1524, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25610413

ABSTRACT

This research examined whether preschool-aged children show less trust in physically disabled or obese informants. In Study 1, when learning about novel physical activities and facts, 4- and 5-year-olds preferred to endorse the testimony of a physically abled, non-obese informant rather than a physically disabled or obese one. In Study 2, after seeing that the physically disabled or obese informant was previously reliable whereas the physically abled, non-obese one was unreliable, 4- and 5-year-olds did not show a significant preference for either informant. We conclude that in line with the literature on children's negative stereotypes of physically disabled or obese others, preschoolers are biased against these individuals as potential sources of new knowledge. This bias is robust in that past reliability might undermine its effect on children, but cannot reverse it.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...