Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Oncol ; 27(8): 1546-56, 2016 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27117533

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic resistance to gemcitabine in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is attributed to various cellular mechanisms and signaling molecules that influence as a single factor or in combination. DESIGN: In this study, utilizing in vitro p21-activated kinase 1 (Pak1) overexpression and knockdown cell line models along with in vivo athymic mouse tumor xenograft models and clinical samples, we demonstrate that Pak1 is a crucial signaling kinase in gemcitabine resistance. RESULTS: Pak1 kindles resistance via modulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and activation of pancreatic stellate cells. Our results from gemcitabine-resistant and -sensitive cell line models showed that elevated Pak1 kinase activity is required to confer gemcitabine resistance. This was substantiated by elevated levels of phosphorylated Pak1 and ribonucleotide reductase M1 levels in the majority of human PDAC tumors when compared with normal. Delineation of the signaling pathway revealed that Pak1 confers resistance to gemcitabine by preventing DNA damage, inhibiting apoptosis and regulating survival signals via NF-κB. Furthermore, we found that Pak1 is an upstream interacting substrate of transforming growth factor ß-activated kinase 1-a molecule implicated in gemcitabine resistance. Molecular mechanistic studies revealed that gemcitabine docks with the active site of Pak1; furthermore, gemcitabine treatment induces Pak1 kinase activity both in vivo and in cell-free system. Finally, results from athymic mouse tumor models illustrated that Pak1 inhibition by IPA-3 enhances the cytotoxicity of gemcitabine and brings about pancreatic tumor regression. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study illustrating the mechanistic role of Pak1 in causing gemcitabine resistance via multiple signaling crosstalks, and hence Pak1-specific inhibitors will prove to be a better adjuvant with existing chemotherapy modality for PDAC.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/drug therapy , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , p21-Activated Kinases/genetics , Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Animals , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/genetics , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Cell Line, Tumor , DNA Damage/drug effects , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/adverse effects , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics , Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition/drug effects , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/drug effects , Humans , Mice , Pancreatic Stellate Cells/drug effects , Pancreatic Stellate Cells/pathology , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays , Gemcitabine
2.
Oncogene ; 35(37): 4857-65, 2016 09 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26898755

ABSTRACT

P21 Activated Kinase 1 (Pak1), an oncogenic serine/threonine kinase, is known to have a significant role in the regulation of cytoskeleton and cellular morphology. Runx3 was initially known for its role in tumor suppressor function, but recent studies have reported the oncogenic role of Runx3 in various cancers. However, the mechanism that controls the paradoxical functions of Runx3 still remains unclear. In this study, we show that Runx3 is a physiologically interacting substrate of Pak1. We identified the site of phosphorylation in Runx3 as Threonine 209 by mass spectrometry analysis and site-directed mutagenesis, and further confirmed the same with a site-specific antibody. Results from our functional studies showed that Threonine 209 phosphorylation in Runx3 alters its subcellular localization by protein mislocalization from the nucleus to the cytoplasm and subsequently converses its biological functions. This was further supported by in vivo tumor xenograft studies in nude mouse models which clearly demonstrated that PANC-28 cells transfected with the Runx3-T209E clone showed high tumorigenic potential as compared with other clones. Our results from clinical samples also suggest that Threonine 209 phosphorylation by Pak1 could be a potential therapeutic target and of great clinical relevance with implications for Runx3 inactivation in cancer cells where Runx3 is known to be oncogenic. The findings presented in this study provide evidence of Runx3-Threonine 209 phosphorylation as a molecular switch in dictating the tissue-specific dualistic functions of Runx3 for the first time.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Core Binding Factor Alpha 3 Subunit/genetics , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/genetics , Neoplasms/genetics , Animals , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Nucleus/genetics , Cytoplasm , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/genetics , Humans , Mice , Mutagenesis, Site-Directed , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/pathology , Phosphorylation , Threonine/metabolism , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
3.
Oncogene ; 34(4): 455-64, 2015 Jan 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24561527

ABSTRACT

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the eighth largest cause of cancer-related mortality across the world, with a median 5-year survival rate of less than 3.5%. This is partly because the molecules and the molecular mechanisms that contribute to PDAC are not well understood. Our goal is to understand the role of p21-activated kinase 1 (Pak1) signaling axis in the progression of PDAC. Pak1, a serine/threonine kinase, is a well-known regulator of cytoskeletal remodeling, cell motility, cell proliferation and cell survival. Recent reports suggest that Pak1 by itself can have an oncogenic role in a wide variety of cancers. In this study, we analyzed the expression of Pak1 in human pancreatic cancer tissues and found that Pak1 levels are significantly upregulated in PDAC samples as compared with adjacent normals. Further, to study the functional role of Pak1 in pancreatic cancer model systems, we developed stable overexpression and lentiviral short hairpin RNA-mediated knockdown (KD) clones of Pak1 and studied the changes in transforming properties of the cells. We also observed that Pak1 KD clones failed to form tumors in nude mice. By adopting a quantitative PCR array-based approach, we identified fibronectin, a component of the extracellular matrix and a mesenchymal marker, as a transcriptional target of Pak1 signaling. The underlying molecular mechanism of Pak1-mediated transformation includes its nuclear import and recruitment to the fibronectin promoter via interaction with nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB)-p65 complex. To our knowledge, this is the first study illustrating Pak1-NF-κB-p65-mediated fibronectin regulation as a potent tumor-promoting mechanism in KRAS intact model.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/etiology , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic , Fibronectins/genetics , Pancreatic Neoplasms/etiology , Transcription, Genetic , p21-Activated Kinases/physiology , Animals , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Humans , Mice , Pancreatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Transcription Factor RelA/physiology
4.
J Evol Biol ; 19(4): 1058-70, 2006 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16780507

ABSTRACT

Male genitalia in Drosophila exemplify strikingly rapid and divergent evolution, whereas female genitalia are relatively invariable. Whereas precopulatory and post-copulatory sexual selection has been invoked to explain this trend, the functional significance of genital structures during copulation remains obscure. We used time-sequence analysis to study the functional significance of external genitalic structures during the course of copulation, between D. melanogaster and D. simulans. This functional analysis has provided new information that reveals the importance of male-driven copulatory mechanics and strategies in the rapid diversification of genitalia. The posterior process, which is a recently evolved sexual character and present only in males of the melanogaster clade, plays a crucial role in mounting as well as in genital coupling. Whereas there is ample evidence for precopulatory and/or post-copulatory female choice, we show here that during copulation there is little or no physical female choice, consequently, males determine copulation duration. We also found subtle differences in copulatory mechanics between very closely related species. We propose that variation in male usage of novel genitalic structures and shifts in copulatory behaviour have played an important role in the diversification of genitalia in species of the Drosophila subgroup.


Subject(s)
Biological Evolution , Copulation , Drosophila/physiology , Genitalia, Male/growth & development , Sexual Behavior, Animal , Animals , Female , Genitalia, Female/ultrastructure , Genitalia, Male/ultrastructure , Male , Microscopy, Electron , Species Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...