Sequentially Irradiated and Annealed Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty at 10-Year Follow-up.

Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) has become the preferred bearing surface in total hip arthroplasty. However, its acceptance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has not been as robust because of concerns pertaining to wear and its impact on implant failure. Therefore, this multicenter study was purposed to evaluate the 10-year (1) radiographic outcomes; (2) complications; and (3) implant survivorship in patients with TKA receiving a sequentially irradiated and annealed HXLPE. A retrospective, multi-center study was performed on 139 patients (171 TKAs) who underwent primary TKA with HXLPE and possessed a minimum of 10-year follow-up. Radiographs were analyzed for radiolucencies along the implant-fixation interface using the Modern Knee Society Radiographic Evaluation System. Kaplan-Meier analysis determined implant survivorship when the end points were revision for polyethylene wear and polyethylene revision for any reason. Sixteen TKAs (9.9%) demonstrated periprosthetic linear radio-lucencies. Seventeen TKAs (9.9%) required additional surgeries, 9 (5.3%) of which were revisions, with 1 (0.6%) TKA requiring revision because of polyethylene wear. Other causes of revision included instability (1.8%), infection (1.6%), and arthrofibrosis (1.6%). The mean time to revision was 5.9 years (range, 0.1-11.1 years). Survivorship pertaining to polyethylene revision for wear was 99.4%, whereas all-cause polyethylene revision was 94.7%. This study in patients undergoing primary TKA using a second-generation HXLPE demonstrated excellent results with respect to polyethylene wear characteristics and strength with a 99.4% survivorship at 10 years. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(2):e111-e117.].

Sequentially Irradiated and Annealed Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene: Linear Vector and Volumetric Wear in Total Hip Arthroplasty at 10 Years.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data on the long-term performance of highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE). Therefore, this study evaluated 10-year 1) functional, 2) radiographic, and 3) surgical outcomes in patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty with sequentially irradiated and annealed HXLPE. METHODS: A retrospective, multicenter study was conducted on patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty and received HXLPE polymer (n = 151). Two-dimensional radiographic linear and volumetric wear analyses were quantified using the Martell Hip Analysis software, while functional outcomes were assessed by analyzing postoperative Short-Form-12 (SF-12) Physical and Mental Health Surveys and Harris Hip Scores. Radiographic outcomes included yearly linear (mm/y) and volumetric (mm3/y) wear rates. Surgical outcomes included additional operations and survivorship. RESULTS: SF-12 scores were within 1 standard deviation (SD) of the normal population (SF-12 Physical: 47.0; SF-12 Mental: 52.0), while the Harris Hip Scores of 89.5 was borderline between "good" and "excellent." Total and annual linear wear rates were 0.164 mm (SD: 0.199 mm) and 0.015 mm/y (SD: 0.018 mm/y), respectively. The mean total volumetric wear rate was 141.4 mm3 (SD: 165.0) and 12.6 mm3/y (SD: 14.9 mm3/y) when broken down into a yearly rate. Eleven patients required revisions, resulting in an all-cause polyethylene survivorship of 92.7%, with a polyethylene wear survivorship of 100.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate clinically undetectable linear and volumetric wear rates after 10 years in those who received the unique sequentially irradiated and annealed HXLPE. Furthermore, high rates of survivorship coupled with low all-cause revision rates illustrate the polymers' capability to potentially increase implant longevity.

Mid-Term Follow Up of Newer-Generation Morphometric Wedge Stems for Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA).

INTRODUCTION: Proximally coated, morphometric wedge femoral stems illustrated excellent survivorship and clinical outcomes at a minimum five-year postoperative follow up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We completed a retrospective review of 186 THA patients from three high-volume surgeons to assess clinical- and patient-reported outcomes five years after implantation with a cementless, proximally coated morphometric wedge femoral stem. We reviewed Gruen zones on early postoperative and mid-term radiographs for signs of osteolysis, loosening, and wear. Clinical- and patient-reported outcomes were compared with previously published two-year outcomes for these femoral stems. RESULTS: No progression of radiolucencies or loosening was observed radiographically when comparing minimum one-year and five-year follow up. Reactive radiodense lines were observed in 23 cases (12.64%), and 13 cases (7.14%) exhibited true radiolucencies of 1-3mm, and all remained unchanged between follow ups or were no longer present on the five-year film. Cortical hypertrophy was noted in Gruen zones 3 and/or 5 in 11 cases (6.04%). No stems were revised for mechanical loosening or for periprosthetic fracture. Nine (9) patients (4.87%) underwent revisions during the follow-up period for periprosthetic infection, femoral head and/or acetabular component revisions, and impingement requiring release and femoral head change. Average Harris Hip Scores were excellent at five years and improved slightly when compared to a two-year follow up; however, this change was not statistically significant. Health-related quality of life mental component and physical component scores were a mean of 48.45 and 43.10 at 5 years, respectively. All cause Kaplan-Meier survivorship of the femoral stem was calculated at 98.4% at an average 65.7 months post implantation. Additionally, this cohort exhibited 100% aseptic survivorship during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Newer-generation morphometric wedge femoral stems for THA exhibit excellent radiographic stability, patient satisfaction, and clinical outcomes five years post implantation.

New Technology for Total Knee Arthroplasty Provides Excellent Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Minimum Two-Year Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty has been demonstrated to help increase various patient-reported, clinical, and surgical outcome metrics (PROMs). However, the current literature is limited regarding PROMs data for longer follow-up periods beyond one year. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to 1) report multicenter patient-reported outcomes with multiple metrics, as well as 2) postoperative surgeon-specific outcomes at a minimum two-year follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five fellowship-trained, high-volume surgeons performed a total of 188 total knee arthroplasty surgeries using the enhanced preoperative planning and real-time intraoperative feedback of a robotic-assisted device. Patients from all surgeons followed similar postoperative rehabilitation beginning on postoperative day one. Patients were evaluated based on the Short Form-12 Questionnaire (SF-12), the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and Knee Society total and subscores (KSS). The SF-12 was subdivided into two components: mental composite score (MCS) and physical composite score (PCS). The KSS was subdivided into functional and knee scores. Additionally, surgical outcomes from the latest follow-up visit were evaluated. All patients were evaluated at a minimum of two years follow-up time. RESULTS: All patients reported excellent postoperative outcomes for all three PROMs. The mean postoperative SF-12 MCS and PCS scores were both 57 points, with 50 as the threshold for norm-based scoring (MCS range: 42 to 69 points; PCS range: 41 to 68 points). The mean FJS was 75 points (range: 14 to 100 points). The mean KSS functional score was 84 points (range: 20 to 100) while the mean Knee Score was 92 points (range: 40 to 100). Similarly, we found that the aseptic revision rates were low (n=2, 1.06%, one for unexplained pain, and another for a post-traumatic tibial fracture) with few other postoperative complications (n=7 patients [3.7%]) in our cohort. CONCLUSION: Our analysis found that patients had excellent outcomes across multiple PROM metrics. Future work can build on these results with large patient populations over longer follow-up intervals. Nevertheless, these results provide the foundation and evidence to support the continued use of this innovative technology for total knee arthroplasties.

Manipulation Under Anesthesia Rates in Technology-Assisted versus Conventional-Instrumentation Total Knee Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Various technological advancements, specifically robotic assistance, have been implemented for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures to attempt to improve patient outcomes and decrease complication rates. Manipulations under anesthesia have been considered a surrogate for knee stiffness, an undesired postoperative outcome that can potentially be avoided. Currently, there is a lack of information regarding the impact that these new technologies have on manipulations under anesthesia (MUA) rates following TKA. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate rates of MUAs between a consecutive series of patients who underwent robotic-assisted surgery compared to patients who underwent TKA with conventional instrumentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 188 consecutive robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasties were performed by five fellowship-trained, high-volume surgeons at academic and community institutions. Patients were paired to a consecutive equal number of control patients by each of the specific surgeon for comparison. All patients followed similar postoperative rehabilitation starting on postoperative day one. Rates of MUAs were evaluated within and between cohorts. Additionally, the percent difference of rates was calculated to compare cohorts. All patients were evaluated at a minimum of two years follow-up time from the index procedure. Chi-square analyses was performed to statistically compare MUA rates between the cohorts. RESULTS: The overall manipulation under anesthesia rate for the study cohort was 1.06% (2/188 patients), while it was 4.79% in the control cohort (9/188) (p=0.032). A 127.5% difference in manipulation under anesthesia rates was found between the two cohorts. No individual surgeons had higher MUA rates in their robotic-assisted group. CONCLUSION: Our study found that patients undergoing robotic-assisted TKA experienced a significant, 4.5-fold decrease in rates of manipulation under anesthesia (p=0.032). Given that MUAs can be a marker of knee stiffness following total knee arthroplasty, the lower rate indicates that study cohort patients had less knee stiffness and, therefore, greater initial postoperative range of motion than the control cohort. Based on these data, assistive technologies may have an advantageous role contributing to enhanced patient outcomes.

Linear Wear Rates of a Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Hip Liner.

INTRODUCTION: To help limit wear, newer polyethylene liners, such as the highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) liners, have been developed. These newer liners undergo an alternating irradiation process, resulting in a stronger, longer-lasting liner. The purpose of this study was to analyze the wear rates of patients who underwent THA and received a newer generation HXLPE acetabular insert. Specifically, we compared: 1) linear vector wear amount and 2) linear vector wear rates in patients as an overall cohort and by gender. We also assessed patient satisfaction outcomes comparing preoperative Harris Hip Scores (HHS) to seven-week, one-year, and three-year HHS scores. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 23 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) with direct superior approach by a fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeon at a private practice institution were analyzed after receiving institutional review board approval. Patients had a minimum two-year follow up, with the mean follow up being four years (range, three to five years). All patients received a 36-mm ceramic femoral head with an HXLPE liner. 2D radiographic polyethylene wear analysis was performed using the Martell Hip Analysis Suite (HAS; University of Chicago, Illinois), which has been previously validated in the literature. Outcomes were assessed using Harris Hip Scores. RESULTS: A five-year linear wear rate of 0.073 mm/year (range, 0 to 0.160 mm/year) and an overall mean linear wear rate of 0.096 mm/year (range, 0 to 0.277 mm/year) were found. No significant differences in wear were seen between genders. Additionally, patients reported significantly better results at seven-weeks (83 points [range, 59 to 100 points]) and one-year (94 points [range, 85 to 100 points]) than preoperative (52 points [range, 34 to 73 points]) HSS scores (p<0.05). No patients underwent revision THA. CONCLUSION: The results from this study highlight the benefits of using an HXLPE polyethylene liner in THA patients and further validates previously reported wear rates of HXLPE liners. After an early "wear in" period during the first year, the wear rates steadily decreased over time. This liner showed excellent early outcomes as no patients underwent revision THA. Furthermore, even as early as seven postoperative weeks, patients reported significantly better HHS scores. Future studies should track the same patient cohort over time to help develop a wear-rate prediction model.

A Comparative Effectiveness Study for Non-Operative Treatment Methods for Knee Osteoarthritis.

A number of non-operative treatment options are commonly prescribed for patients presenting with degenerative osteoarthritis of the knee, where surgery is not yet recommended. However, there is a paucity of studies evaluating the comparative effectiveness of these treatment options to best inform both patients and providers. This study examined the comparative effectiveness of a home exercise program versus bracing or a combination of the two (brace-only, exercise-only, and brace and exercise cohorts) on the following: 1) objective functional measures (quadriceps muscle strength, Self-Paced Walk Test [SPWT], and Timed "Up & Go" [TUG] Test); 2) subjective functional measures (Lower Extremity Function Scale [LEFS] and Health Survey [VR-12] outcomes); 3) pain using Visual Analog Scale [VAS-10]; 4) patient metrics (patient treatment preference, perceptions, and compliance); and 5) progression to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) over a 12-week period. Subjects exhibited significant improvements from baseline on all measures regardless of group assignment; however, the only significant difference between groups was the larger improvement in pain scores between the brace-only and the exercise-only cohorts (p = 0.022). The brace-only regimen may be more efficacious; however, larger studies are needed to confirm this. These findings suggest that patients who are provided with either treatment option may be able to achieve a better quality of life and return to activity that may delay an elective joint arthroplasty surgery.

Outcomes of Second-Generation Tapered Wedge Femoral Stem.

INTRODUCTION: Newer generation cementless femoral stems have been designed to emulate more precisely the anatomy of the native femur. However, few studies have evaluated these designs. The purpose of this study was therefore to evaluate outcomes of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients who received a second-generation, tapered wedge stem by analyzing (1) all-cause and aseptic implant survivorships; (2) clinical and patient-reported outcomes; (3) radiographic outcomes; and (4) incidence of complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 202 primary THA patients (37% men, 63% women) who had a mean age of 63 years (range, 18 to 88) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 29 (range, 18 to 40). All patients underwent THA using a press-fit, tapered wedge stem with a morphometric design containing a size-specific medial curvature, which optimizes initial press-fit stability. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to determine implant survivorship, and Harris Hip Scores (HHS) and the Short form-36 (SF-36) were used to evaluate clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Early postoperatively and annually thereafter, pelvic radiographs were reviewed for evidence of osteolysis or loosening. Complications were identified through a comprehensive chart review and were classified as either surgical or medical. RESULTS: At final follow-up, the all-cause and aseptic survivorships for the femoral stem were 99.5% and 100%, respectively. At final follow-up, the mean HHS was 87 (range, 35 to 100). The SF-36 mental and physical component scores were 47 (range, 19 to 65) and 47 (range, 23 to 65), respectively, at final follow-up. No progressive radiolucencies or loosening were observed. Surgical complications included nerve palsy, posterior trochanteric avulsion, arthrofibrosis, and periprosthetic fracture. The only medical complication was acute renal failure. CONCLUSION: This second-generation stem demonstrated excellent short-term survivorship and functional outcomes. The improved patient fit of this stem may yield continued favorable results with longer-term follow-up.

Minimum 5-year follow-up for primary THA using a tapered, proximally coated cementless stem.

The purpose of this study was to assess the survivorship of a proximally coated, cementless femoral stem used for total hip arthroplasty at a minimum 5-year follow-up by assessing clinical outcomes and implant survival. A total of 936 primary total hip arthroplasties were performed in 854 patients by 3 high-volume surgeons between 2001 and 2007. Patients included 385 men and 469 women with a mean age of 56 years (range, 20-88 years) and a mean follow-up of 7 years (range, 5-11 years). The aseptic revision rate related to the femoral component was 0.3%. Three patients underwent revision of the femoral component. Mean postoperative Harris Hip Score improved to 91 points (range, 70-100 points). When stratified by primary cause of total hip arthroplasty, no differences were found in implant survivorship or postoperative Harris Hip Scores. With the exception of the 3 patients who underwent revision surgery, postoperative radiographic evaluation of the stems demonstrated no progressive radiolucencies, component malalignment, change in component position, or implant subsidence at most recent follow-up.These results are encouraging and indicate a 0.3% revision rate for the femoral component. The cause of primary total hip arthroplasty did not affect the clinical outcomes. These types of prostheses will provide patients with a stable implant that is expected to have excellent durability and longevity.

A Comparison Study of Two Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Designs: A Preliminary Report.

Cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties have had high success rates. The purpose of this study was to compare a newer cruciate-retaining design to a previously used implant to determine if there were any changes in clinical or functional outcome. A total of 461 patients (553 knees) were identified who had total knee arthroplasty with this newer design. At latest 2-year follow-up, the mean range of motion was 121 degrees (range 105 to 140 degrees), the mean Knee Society pain score was 91 points (range, 57 to 100 points) and the functional score was 76 points (45 to 100 points). The comparison group of 211 patients (225 knees) had a mean range of motion of 119 degrees at 2 years (range, 90 to 142 degrees) with Knee Society pain and functional scores of 95 and 85 points, respectively (ranges 57 to 100, and 0 to 100, respectively). The use of the newer cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty showed comparable results to the previously used design at short-term follow-up. The cruciate-retaining design used in this study had no early failures, though further study is needed to make assessments regarding longer-term functional results and outcomes.