Modern Approach to Melanoma Adjuvant Treatment with Anti-PD1 Immune Check Point Inhibitors or BRAF/MEK Targeted Therapy: Multicenter Real-World Report.

BACKGROUND: The landscape of melanoma management changed as randomized trials have launched adjuvant treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An analysis of data on 248 consecutive melanoma stage III and IV patients given adjuvant therapy in eight centers (February 2019 to January 2021) was conducted. RESULTS: The analyzed cohort comprised 147 melanoma patients given anti-PD1 (33% nivolumab, 26% pembrolizumab), and 101 (41%) were given dabrafenib plus trametinib (DT). The 2-year overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and distant-metastases-free survival (DMFS) rates were 86.7%, 61.4%, and 70.2%, respectively. The disease stage affected only the RFS rate; for stage IV, it was 52.2% (95% CI: 33.4-81.5%) vs. 62.5% (95% CI: 52.3-74.8%) for IIIA-D, p = 0.0033. The type of lymph node surgery before adjuvant therapy did not influence the outcomes. Completion of lymph node dissection cessation after positive SLNB did not affect the results in terms of RFS or OS. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were associated with longer 24-month RFS, with a rate of 68.7% (55.5-84.9%) for TRAE vs. 56.6% (45.8-70%) without TRAE, p = 0.0031. For TRAE of grade ≥ 3, a significant decline in OS to 60.6% (26.9-100%; p = 0.004) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Melanoma adjuvant therapy with anti-PD1 or DT outside clinical trials appears to be effective and comparable with the results of registration studies. Our data support a de-escalating surgery approach in melanoma treatment.

Immune-Related Thyroid Adverse Events Predict Response to PD-1 Blockade in Patients with Melanoma.

Antibodies against programmed cell death protein-1 or its ligand (PD-(L)1) are a standard of care in melanoma; however, this treatment may cause immune-related adverse events. The aim of this study was to evaluate the immune-related thyroid adverse events (irTAEs) during anti-PD-1 therapy and analyze their influence on the overall survival rates in melanoma. We included 249 patients with metastatic melanoma treated in our institution between 2014 and 2021; the median age was 62 years (range: 17-90); 58% were males, and 37% of patients had the BRAF mutation. We included patients with a normal TSH at baseline and followed up with measurement of TSH levels during immunotherapy. In our group, 95 patients had a TSH outside the normal range: 63 not clinically significant and 32 with clinical symptoms of hypothyroidism. The 3-year overall survival rate was related to the irTAEs of clinical hypothyroidism, abnormal clinically not significant TSH, and euthyreosis at 56%, 43%, and 32%, respectively (p = 0.002). After adjusting the Cox model for potential confounding variables, clinically significant hypothyroidism was an independent prognostic factor with HR 0.51 (95% CI 0.29-0.87). In conclusion, the patients who developed clinically significant hypothyroidism requiring replacement therapy with L-thyroxin were the group who benefitted most from anti-PD-1 treatment.

Age as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Ewing Sarcoma-The Polish Sarcoma Group Experience.

Ewing sarcoma (ES) is a rare and aggressive disease that requires multidisciplinary treatment with the use of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery. Our retrospective study aimed to analyze the prognostic factors and treatment results in different age groups of patients. Between 1998 and 2018, 569 patients with ES were treated in two referral centers. The patients were divided into four age groups (≤10 years; 11-18 years; 19-25, and >25). The treatment results and prognostic factors were assessed for each group. For statistical analyses, we used the Chi2 test, the Kaplan-Meier estimator with a log-rank test, and the multivariate Cox model. Five-year overall survival (OS) rate was 56%. In the age subgroups: ≤10 years, 11-18 years, 19-25 years, and >25 years, the 5-year OS rates were 75%, 58%, 41%, and 52%, respectively. Favorable prognostic factors: female gender (p = 0.024), non-axial localization (p = 0.005), VIDE regimen (p < 0.001), and surgery as a local treatment (p < 0.001) dominated in the group ≤10 years. In multivariate analysis, male (HR = 1.53), axial localization (HR = 1.46), M1 status at presentation (HR = 2.64), and age > 10 years (HR = 2.29) were associated with shorter OS. The treatment results in ES are significantly better in children aged ≤10 years; the challenge is to provide therapy for adolescents and young adults. The diagnostics and treatment of ES patients must be provided in referral centers.

Mutational landscape of primary and recurrent Ewing sarcoma.

INTRODUCTION: Ewing sarcoma (ES) is a highly aggressive malignancy of bone and soft tissues characterized by the presence of a genetic fusion involving the EWSR1 gene. More than one-third of patients develop distant metastases, which are associated with unfavorable prognosis. Knowledge about the disease's genetic landscape may help foster progress in using targeted therapies in the treatment of ES. AIM OF THE STUDY: The objective is to assess the mutational landscape of ES in pretreatment samples, tumor samples after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and in metastatic/recurrent tumors in children and adults. MATERIAL AND METHODS: DNA from 39 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples of 22 patients (17 adults, 5 children) were analyzed by targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) using the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay v3gene panel. Additional functional analyses were performed between patient subgroups. RESULTS: All samples were characterized by low tumor mutation burden (< 10 mut/Mb). The most commonly mutated genes were PIK3R1 (59%) and POLE (50%). The most widely detected variants in biopsy samples were PIK3R1 T369I (50%), FGFR1 E159K, and TP53 at codon 72 (both in 27.3%). Additionally, the ATR,BRCA1, RAD50,ATM,CHEK1, and NBN genes showed a significantly higher number of mutations in ES. Mutations in PIK3R1 were significantly more frequent in adults, while mutations in the pathways responsible for cell cycle control, DNA repair, and transcriptional regulation were more frequent in children. CONCLUSIONS: Besides EWSR1 fusion, ES is characterized by numerous point mutations that are potential targets for precision medicine. There is high genomic heterogeneity that may explain differences in outcomes between patient subgroups.

The clinical prognostic factors and treatment outcomes of adult patients with Ewing sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: The data about treatment results of Ewing sarcoma in adult patients are limited. The aim of our study was to analyze prognostic factors and outcomes of therapy in this group of patients. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2018, 180 patients at the age of > 18 years old diagnosed with Ewing sarcoma were treated in referral center according to multimodal protocols. In 50 patients (28%) treatment was initiated outside our hospital, and 23 of them had started recommended therapy after 3 months since the date of biopsy/unscheduled operation. We analyzed clinical prognostic factors and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The median age was 28 years (18-67 years), primary tumor was localized axially in 114 patients (63%), metastases at presentation were detected in 51 pts (28%). 5-year OS rate was 65% for patients with localized disease, in metastatic disease it was 15%; the presence and the number of metastases was a prognostic factor. 5-year PFS was significantly better in patients treated at referral center (or when the patients were admitted to referral center within 3 months from the date of biopsy, which was performed outside referral center), comparing to patients treated initially outside referral center; 5-year PFS rates in total population were 28 and 13%, respectively. In terms of OS, unfavorable prognostic factor showing a statistical trend (p = 0.098) was lower dose density of neoadjuvant chemotherapy due to toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately two-third of adult patients with localized Ewing sarcoma survive 5 years. In order to improve survival of this patients the multidisciplinary treatment in referral center is mandatory.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy in older patients (≥ 70 years) with metastatic melanoma: a multicentre study.

INTRODUCTION: The use of immunotherapy in older patients remains challenging due to very few data on the efficacy and safety of treatment in this group. AIM: To analyse the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors in older patients (≥ 70 years) with metastatic melanoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute - Oncology Centre, between 2011 and 2017, 318 non-resectable or metastatic melanoma patients were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: anti-CTLA-4 or/and anti-PD-1. Eighty-two patients were ≥ 70 years (median age: 76 years; range: 70-90 years). Among this group 10% of patients had brain metastases, 24% of patients had BRAF mutant melanoma, and co-morbidities were present in 86% of patients (mainly hypertension, cardiovascular diseases and/or diabetes). RESULTS: Median PFS and OS were similar in patients < 70 years and ≥ 70 years. In the group of patients ≥ 70 years old, the 2-year OS rate (from the start of immunotherapy) was 27%, and in patients aged < 70 it was 28% (p = NS). Two-year progression-free survival was 13.7% in the group of patients ≥ 70 years old and in patients aged < 70 it was 13% (p = NS). Patients ≥ 70 years of age were significantly less likely to have a BRAF mutation (p = 0.020). The presence of co-morbidities was not associated with an increased risk of immunotherapy (p = 0.790). CONCLUSIONS: The survival and toxicity profile in the older patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors are similar to younger patients. Therefore, the age as a clinical factor should not exclude this population from the most effective therapy used nowadays in melanoma treatment.

High baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts worse outcome in patients with metastatic BRAF-positive melanoma treated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been shown to be prognostic in several solid malignancies. There are limited data regarding its value during novel therapies in patients with melanoma. The aim of the study was to assess the practical utility of this ratio in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma treated with a combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors (BRAFi/MEKi). We included 215 patients with inoperable or metastatic melanoma who underwent BRAFi/MEKi treatment between October 2015 and June 2017. Baseline NLR and other complete blood count-derived inflammatory markers were tested for association with overall survival and progression-free survival in univariate and multivariate models. On-treatment NLR was also assessed for relationship with these outcomes using the time-dependent Cox's proportional hazard model. Prognostic model based on NLR and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels was also developed. Patients with NLR values more than four had poorer progression-free survival (P<0.001, 1-year rates 51.6 vs. 26.7%) and overall survival (P<0.001, 1-year rates 77.3 vs. 53.1%). In a multivariate model adjusted for LDH levels, metastatic sites and age baseline NLR ratio and delay in starting MEKi were deemed statistically significant (hazard ratio: 1.81; 95% confidence interval: 1.16-2.85; P=0.009 and hazard ratio: 2.06; 95% confidence interval: 1.24-3.44, P=0.005 respectively). In a model based on NLR and LDH, 1-year survival rates were 57, 40 and 23%, respectively if zero, one or both factors were elevated. Our results demonstrate the usefulness of NLR and a predictive model based on combinations of NLR and LDH as a prognostic markers during BRAFi/MEKi treatment. Our real-world data confirm the efficacy of BRAFi/MEKi therapy showed in the clinical trials.

Long-term results of therapy with sunitinib in metastatic alveolar soft part sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare, highly vascularized soft tissue sarcoma characterized by a high frequency of metastatic disease and resistance to classical chemotherapy. The purpose of our analysis was to assess long-term sunitinib activity in the treatment of metastatic ASPS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2009 and 2015, 15 patients were diagnosed with metastatic ASPS and received therapy with sunitinib at initial continuous daily dosing of 37.5 mg. Median age was 32 years. The primary tumor sites were lower extremities (8), trunk-retroperitoneum/pelvis (2), upper extremity (3) and other (2). All patients had unresectable disease (primary or relapse in the form of metastases to the lungs ± bones). Five patients received systemic therapy before initiating sunitinib. Median follow-up from start of sunitinib was 38 months (range 5-69 months). RESULTS: At the time of analysis 4 patients continue therapy and 9 are still alive. Six patients had RECIST partial remission as best response, 8 had stable disease, and 1 had disease progression. The median progression-free survival was 19 months, with 86% of patients being free of progression at 6 months. Median overall survival was 56 months; the 5-year overall survival rate was 49%. Five patients were treated with sunitinib longer than 2 years. All patients experienced some side effects: 8 patients (53%) had CTCAE grade 3/4 toxicity, 7 patients required dose reduction. The most common toxicities were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, hypothyroidism, arterial hypertension, and hand-foot syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis confirms the long-term efficacy of sunitinib in patients with advanced ASPS.