Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pol Merkur Lekarski ; 50(299): 299-301, 2022 Oct 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36283012

ABSTRACT

In early 2020 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Micra AV - a new type of leadless pacemaker with atrioventricular synchrony, to treat patients with atrio-ventricular (AV) blocks. We describe one of the first in Poland case of a patient who was implanted with Micra AV pacemaker. CASE REPORT: A 38-year-old female patient was admitted to the clinic due to the 29-seconds event of a complete AV block without an escape rhythm and was implanted with a dual chamber pacemaker without any complications. After several months she was admitted again with suspicion of ventricular perforation by the pacemaker electrode and underwent a replacement procedure of both pacemaker's leads. Nevertheless, one week later the patient developed a fever with significantly elevated inflammatory markers. The blood cultures were negative but in the transesophageal echocardiography features of cardiac device-related infective endocarditis were observed. Empirical antibiotic therapy was administered, and the device was removed. The Heart Team qualified the patient for the implantation of a MicraTM AV leadless pacemaker. The procedure was performed without any complications and the device was implanted to the right ventricle. All parameters were correct, and the patient was discharged. CONCLUSIONS: Micra AV may be a feasible and safe option for young patients with paroxysmal AV block after device-related complications.


Subject(s)
Atrioventricular Block , Endocarditis , Pacemaker, Artificial , Female , Humans , Adult , Atrioventricular Block/therapy , Atrioventricular Block/etiology , Pacemaker, Artificial/adverse effects , Heart Ventricles , Endocarditis/complications , Anti-Bacterial Agents
2.
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis ; 9(7)2022 Jul 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35877587

ABSTRACT

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are currently the second-line pharmacotherapy in type 2 diabetes, particularly through their effectiveness in reducing glycemia, but also due to their cardioprotective and nephroprotective effects. In light of surprisingly satisfactory results from large, randomized trials on gliflozins, SGLT2 received the highest recommendation (Class IA) with the highest level of evidence (A) in the treatment algorithm for HF with reduced LVEF in recent ESC HF guidelines. This great breakthrough in the treatment of HF is due to different mechanisms of action of gliflozins that are reported to be able to change the natural course of HF by reducing the risk of both hospitalization and death. They are recommended regardless of the patient's diabetes status. This review summarizes the up-to-date literature on their beneficial and pleiotropic impact on the cardiovascular system.

3.
Kardiol Pol ; 80(6): 679-684, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35475461

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) are well-accepted life-saving devices for treating potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmia, but little is known about quality of life (QoL) in patients with S-ICD and ICD. AIMS: Our study aimed to compare QoL in patients with S-ICD and ICD. METHODS: All consecutive patients who had S-ICD implanted between October 2015 and September 2021 were included in the study. A cohort of transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) patients was matched to S-ICD subjects by sex, age, indications for the device, and type of prevention. All patients were requested to fulfill two standardized questionnaires to assess QoL: 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) 6 months after device implantation. RESULTS: Patients with S-ICD (n = 49) and TV-ICD (n = 49) did not differ regarding baseline characteristics. There were no statistically significant differences between S-ICD and TV-ICD subgroup, both for mental and physical QoL assessed in SF-36 and MLHFQ (all P = NS). The median MLHFQ total score was 24 (9-41) for S-ICD and 28 (14-43) for TV-ICD (P = 0.83). The median total score for the SF-36 questionnaire was 62.5 (29-86) vs. 59 (38-77) for S-ICD and TV-ICD, respectively (P = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: Quality of life after device implantation does not differ significantly between the groups of patients with subcutaneous and conventional implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.


Subject(s)
Defibrillators, Implantable , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/therapy , Electric Countershock , Humans , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
4.
Clin Case Rep ; 10(3): e05543, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35356173

ABSTRACT

The development of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic caused a common appearance of severe pulmonary complications, rarely seen as a result of the other infections. These are pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, emphysematous bullae, cavitary lung lesions, or subcutaneous emphysema. Their formation is influenced by both-the natural course of the disease and the treatment strategy adopted.

5.
J Arrhythm ; 37(4): 1101-1104, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34386138

ABSTRACT

We report a 15-year-old male with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) after Fontan operation with recurrent, drug-resistant atrial tachycardia. With the use of electro-anatomical mapping system (EnSite) an atrial flutter (AFl) with reentry activation around the tricuspid valve was diagnosed. Successful radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) was performed.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...