Intensive Care Unit and Hospital Outcomes of Patients Admitted with Blastomycosis: A 14-Year Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: Blastomycosis is an uncommon; potentially life-threatening granulomatous fungal infection. The aim of this study is to report hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) outcomes of patients admitted with blastomycosis. METHODS: All patients admitted for treatment of blastomycosis at the Mayo Clinic-Rochester, Minnesota between 01/01/2006 and 09/30/2019 were included. Demographics, comorbidities, clinical presentation, ICU admission, and outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 84 Patients were identified with 90 unique hospitalizations primarily for blastomycosis. The median age at diagnosis was 49 (IQR 28.1-65, range: 6-85) years and 56 (66.7%) were male. The most frequent comorbidities included hypertension (n = 28, 33.3%); immunosuppressed state (n = 25, 29.8%), and diabetes mellitus (n = 21, 25%). The lungs were the only organ involved in 56 (66.7%) cases and the infection was disseminated in 19 (22.6%) cases. A total of 29 patients (34.5%) underwent ICU admission due to complications of blastomycosis. ICU related events included mechanical ventilation (n = 20, 23.8%), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (n = 13, 15.5%), tracheostomy (n = 9, 10.7%), renal replacement therapy (n = 8, 9.5%), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (n = 4, 4.8%). A total of 12 patients (14.3%) died in the hospital; all of whom had undergone ICU admission. In-hospital mortality was associated with renal replacement therapy (RRT) (P = 0.0255). CONCLUSION: Blastomycosis is a serious, potentially life-threatening infection that results in significant morbidity and mortality with a 34.5% ICU admission rate. RRT was associated with in-hospital mortality.

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Therapy With Novel Supra-Annular AltaValve: First Experience in the United States.

This case demonstrates the feasibility and procedural success of a novel supra-annular transcatheter mitral valve, the AltaValve via transapical approach in a patient with severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation who was a prohibitive surgical risk candidate. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Chylothorax as a Risk Factor for Thrombosis in Adults: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative chylothorax in children is associated with an increased risk of vascular thrombosis, hypothesized to be from loss of antithrombin into chylous fluid resulting in a hypercoagulable state. In adults, an increased thrombotic risk with chylothorax has not been described. Adults undergoing Ivor-Lewis esophagogastrectomy have two strong thrombotic risk factors-active malignancy and postoperative state-allowing for relative homogeneity in baseline thrombotic risk; therefore, we studied the association of chylothorax with thrombosis in this population. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care academic center. Patients included adults undergoing Ivor-Lewis esophagogastrectomy between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2012. We collected demographics, pleural fluid characteristics, and relevant imaging within 30 days after the operation. Using nominal logistic regression, we studied the effects of chylothorax, age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification, operative duration, and hospital length of stay on the incidence of postoperative thrombosis. RESULTS: We identified 608 patients who underwent Ivor-Lewis esophagogastrectomy. Of these, 524 (86.2%) had no pleural fluid analysis, 48 (7.9%) had nonchylous effusions, and 36 (5.9%) had chylothoraces, with incident acute vascular thrombosis within 30 days postoperatively occurring in 22 of 524 (4.2%), 2 of 48 (4.2%), and 8 of 36 (22.2%), respectively (p = 0.001). In multivariate analyses, after adjusting for the above factors, chylothorax was associated with significantly higher odds of any vascular thrombosis (odds ratio, 5.46; p = 0.0013) and deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (odds ratio, 6.76; p = 0.0016). CONCLUSIONS: Chylothorax is associated with a significantly higher incidence of vascular thrombosis in adults undergoing Ivor-Lewis esophagogastrectomy. Vascular thrombosis was associated with a significantly higher 90-day mortality rate.

Paclitaxel-eluting stents versus everolimus-eluting coronary stents in a diabetic population: two-year follow-up of the TUXEDO-India trial.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to report whether the superiority of the everolimus-eluting stent (EES) vs. the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) at one-year follow-up in the Taxus Element versus Xience Prime in a Diabetic Population (TUXEDO)-India trial was sustained at longer-term follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: One thousand eight hundred and thirty (1,830) patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease were randomised to EES vs. PES. Follow-up data up to two years were available in 1,701 (92.9%) patients. The primary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF), defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), or ischaemia-driven target vessel revascularisation (TVR). Treatment with EES had a lower two-year rate of TVF (4.3% vs. 6.6%, p=0.03). Of the secondary endpoints, EES significantly reduced any MI (1.6% vs. 3.5%, p=0.01), TV-MI (0.7% vs. 3.1%, p=0.0001), ST (0.4% vs. 2.2%, p=0.001), cardiac death or target vessel MI (2.9% vs. 4.8%, p=0.04) and TLR (1.9% vs. 3.7%, p=0.02), compared with PES. Between one year and two years, no significant differences in the clinical outcomes were observed (pinteraction >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this adequately powered trial, the benefits of EES vs. PES in a diabetic population seen at one year were maintained at two years.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Insulin-Treated and Non-Insulin-Treated Diabetes Mellitus: Secondary Analysis of the TUXEDO Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Prior studies have shown that patients with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (ITDM) have a higher risk of cardiovascular events. However, this finding is controversial, as other studies have shown that the increased risk of cardiovascular events disappears after risk adjustment. In addition, the choice of a drug-eluting stent (limus- vs taxol-eluting) in ITDM is controversial, with studies showing worse outcomes with an everolimus-eluting stent compared with a paclitaxel-eluting stent. OBJECTIVES: To assess the outcomes of patients with ITDM vs non-ITDM who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and to assess the efficacy and safety of an everolimus-eluting stent vs a paclitaxel-eluting stent based on insulin use status. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prespecified analysis was conducted of the Taxus Element vs Xience Prime in a Diabetic Population (TUXEDO) clinical trial, which enrolled 1830 patients with ITDM and non-ITDM from June 23, 2011, to March 12, 2014. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either a paclitaxel-eluting stent or an everolimus-eluting stent. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was target vessel failure, defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization at 1 year after the intervention. RESULTS: Among the 1830 patients (1377 male) in the TUXEDO trial, 747 patients (40.8%) were receiving insulin (ITDM group). Compared with the 1083 patients with non-ITDM, those with ITDM had a significant increase in target vessel failure (42 [5.6%] vs 36 [3.3%]; P = .02), death or myocardial infarction (43 [5.8%] vs 35 [3.2%]; P = .009), death (26 [3.5%] vs 18 [1.7%]; P = .01), and subacute stent thrombosis (8 [1.1%] vs 3 [0.3%]; P = .03). However, in a propensity score-adjusted analysis to account for baseline differences between the 2 groups, the differences in outcomes were no longer significant. In patients with ITDM, everolimus-eluting stents reduced the rate of target vessel failure (13 of 382 [3.4%] vs 29 of 365 [7.9%]; P = .007), major adverse cardiac events (15 of 382 [3.9%] vs 30 of 365 [8.2%]; P = .01), myocardial infarction (5 of 382 [1.3%] vs 16 of 365 [4.4%]; P = .01), stent thrombosis (2 of 382 [0.5%] vs 11 of 365 [3.0%]; P = .009), target lesion revascularization (4 of 382 [1.0%] vs 19 of 365 [5.2%]; P = .001), and target vessel revascularization (4 of 382 [1.0%] vs 19 of 365 [5.2%]; P = .001) when compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents. The results largely trended in the same direction in patients with non-ITDM (P > .05 for the interaction). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Patients with ITDM had a significant increase in the risk of cardiovascular events in unadjusted models that was largely attenuated after propensity score adjustment. Everolimus-eluting stents reduced the rate of cardiovascular events, including stent thrombosis, when compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with ITDM. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ctri.nic.in Identifier: CTRI/2011/06/001830.

Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy: is it safe?

Antiplatelet agents have become a mainstay therapy for vascular diseases; yet, it increases the risk of bleeding. The latter has a potential to impact the safety of invasive procedures. A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT) at each of the 2 institutions was performed to determine the bleeding risk for patients on antiplatelet therapy who underwent PDT. Out of the 246 patients who underwent PDT over the study period, 20 qualified for the study group. All were being treated with clopidogrel. A control group of 137 patients was created. No major bleeding occurred in either of the group. Minor bleeding occurred in 1 study patient (5%) and in 5 (3.6%) of the control patients (P=0.85). The data support the performance of PDT without stopping clopidogrel if there was a clear and ongoing indication for the antiplatelet agent.