Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Laryngol Otol ; 137(4): 363-367, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35445650

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare neural response telemetry and impedance between the round window and cochleostomy approaches for cochlear implantation. METHODS: In this case-control study, 64 patients aged less than 3.5 years underwent cochlear implantation via the round window or cochleostomy approach. Post-operative neural response telemetry and impedance were measured. RESULTS: The impedance measurements at electrodes 1, 11 and 22 showed no significant differences between the two groups three months after implantation (p = 0.90, p = 0.08 and p = 0.37, respectively). Similar results were observed six months after implantation (p = 0.71, p = 0.65 and p = 0.70, respectively). There was no significant difference in neural response telemetry between the two groups after three months. The neural response telemetry of electrode 1 in the cochleostomy group (171.26 ± 19.81 µV) was significantly higher in comparison with that of electrode 1 in the round window group (161.97 ± 12.71 µV) after six months (p = 0.03). The neural response telemetry values for electrodes 11 and 22 did not show any significant difference after six months (p = 0.14 and p = 0.48, respectively). CONCLUSION: Both approaches provide equal stimulation of the cochlear nerve and impedance.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Humans , Child , Child, Preschool , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Electric Impedance , Case-Control Studies , Telemetry , Cochlea/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL