Clinical outcomes in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: results from ARIES, a bevacizumab observational cohort study.

AIMS: Retrospective analyses from first-line clinical studies in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have reported conflicting results on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival benefits with the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy in elderly patients. Here we report effectiveness and safety outcomes by age subgroup for patients with NSCLC in the ARIES observational cohort study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ARIES enrolled patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC who received first-line bevacizumab-containing treatment per physician's choice. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to calculate medians and 95% confidence intervals for PFS and overall survival for patients aged <65, ≥65, <75 and ≥75 years. RESULTS: In total, 1967 patients receiving first-line treatment with bevacizumab and chemotherapy were enrolled. The median PFS and overall survival values were 6.4 (95% confidence interval = 6.0-6.8) and 14.2 (95% confidence interval = 12.7-15.2) months for patients aged <65 years, respectively, and 6.8 (95% confidence interval = 6.3-7.0) and 12.1 (95% confidence interval = 11.4-13.1) months for patients ≥65 years, respectively. For patients <75 years, the median PFS and overall survival values were 6.6 (95% confidence interval = 6.3-6.9) and 13.5 (95% confidence interval = 12.6-14.5) months, respectively, and 6.6 (95% confidence interval = 5.9-7.1) and 11.6 (95% confidence interval = 10.0-12.5) months, respectively, for patients ≥75 years. Incidence proportions of bevacizumab-associated adverse events were generally similar across all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Data from the ARIES study suggest that treatment with bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy is a viable first-line treatment option for elderly bevacizumab-eligible patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC.

Adverse event management in patients with advanced cancer receiving oral everolimus: focus on breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Everolimus, an orally administered rapamycin analogue, inhibits the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a highly conserved intracellular serine-threonine kinase that is a central node in a network of signaling pathways controlling cellular metabolism, growth, survival, proliferation, angiogenesis, and immune function. Everolimus has demonstrated substantial clinical benefit in randomized, controlled, phase III studies leading to approval for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma, advanced neuroendocrine tumors of pancreatic origin, renal angiomyolipoma and subependymal giant-cell astrocytoma associated with tuberous sclerosis complex, as well as advanced hormone-receptor-positive (HR(+)) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative advanced breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We discuss clinically relevant everolimus-related adverse events from the phase III studies, including stomatitis, noninfectious pneumonitis, rash, selected metabolic abnormalities, and infections, with focus on appropriate clinical management of these events and specific considerations in patients with breast cancer. RESULTS: The majority of adverse events experienced during everolimus therapy are of mild to moderate severity. The safety profile and protocols for toxicity management are well established. The class-effect adverse event profile observed with everolimus plus endocrine therapy in breast cancer is (as expected) distinct from that of endocrine therapy alone, but is similar to that observed with everolimus in other solid tumors. Information gained from the experience in other carcinomas on prompt diagnosis and treatments to optimize drug exposure, treatment outcomes, and patients' quality of life also applies to the patient population with advanced breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: As with all orally administered agents, education of both physicians and patients in the management of adverse events for patients receiving everolimus is critical to achieving optimal exposure and clinical benefit. Active monitoring for early identification of everolimus-related adverse events combined with aggressive and appropriate intervention should lead to a reduction in the severity and duration of the event.

Neoadjuvant docetaxel followed by adjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in patients with stage III breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate clinical and pathologic response to neoadjuvant docetaxel therapy in patients with stage III breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients were planned to receive four cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, followed by surgery, four cycles of doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 (AC) every 3 weeks, radiation therapy (RT), and tamoxifen when indicated. RESULTS: After four cycles of neoadjuvant docetaxel, the clinical response rate within the breast was 59% (95% CI 42% to 73%) and overall (breast and axilla) was 49% (95% CI 38% to 72%) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. At the time of surgery, 10% (n=4) of patients had a pathologic complete response (pCR) in the breast, 27% (n=11) had a pCR within the axillary lymph nodes, and 7% (n=3) had a pCR in the breast and axilla (95% CI 2% to 21%). An additional 5% (n=2) had minimal residual invasive tumor (<5 mm). The 5-year overall survival rate was 80%. The percentage of patients with grade 3/4 neutropenia was similar during docetaxel (93%) and AC (86%), while a greater percentage of patients had febrile neutropenia during docetaxel treatment (27%) compared with AC treatment (7%). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant docetaxel followed by surgery, adjuvant AC, hormonal therapy where indicated, and RT is an active regimen for patients with stage III breast cancer.

HER-2/neu expression in archival non-small cell lung carcinomas using FDA-approved Hercep test.

HER-2/neu is a 185 kDa glycoprotein related to the epidermal growth factor receptor. Overexpressed in 25-30% of primary breast carcinomas, HER-2/neu is associated with a poor clinical outcome. Recently the FDA approved an antibody to HER-2/neu, trastuzumab (Herceptin), for the treatment of HER-2/neu overexpressing metastatic breast cancers. Relatively little is known about HER-2/neu status and lung cancers. We reasoned that if HER-2/neu status could be ascertained in non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs), and a clinical correlation can be established, a rationale for the use of Herceptin in this tumor type could be established. Using a FDA-approved standardized diagnostic kit, HercepTest, for detection of HER-2/neu in clinical specimens, we examined the expression of HER-2/neu in NSCLCs in archival paraffin-embedded specimens (N = 81). In normal epithelium, HER-2/neu expression was not detected in a majority of samples (74/81). HER-2/neu overexpression was detected in 27% of the tumors of different histological types including adenocarcinomas, large cell carcinomas, and squamous cell carcinomas. Poor to moderately differentiated, but not well differentiated tumors showed overexpression of HER-2/neu. The specificity of HercepTest was further increased (from 27% to 21%) when the expression in the few normal tissues was subtracted from the tumor score. HER-2/neu may offer an attractive predictive and prognostic factor for NSCLC.

Cancer gene discovery using digital differential display.

The Cancer Gene Anatomy Project database of the National Cancer Institute has thousands of expressed sequences, both known and novel, in the form of expressed sequence tags (ESTs). These ESTs, derived from diverse normal and tumor cDNA libraries, offer an attractive starting point for cancer gene discovery. Using a data-mining tool called Digital Differential Display (DDD) from the Cancer Gene Anatomy Project database, ESTs from six different solid tumor types (breast, colon, lung, ovary, pancreas, and prostate) were analyzed for differential expression. An electronic expression profile and chromosomal map position of these hits were generated from the Unigene database. The hits were categorized into major classes of genes including ribosomal proteins, enzymes, cell surface molecules, secretory proteins, adhesion molecules, and immunoglobulins and were found to be differentially expressed in these tumorderived libraries. Genes known to be up-regulated in prostate, breast, and pancreatic carcinomas were discovered by DDD, demonstrating the utility of this technique. Two hundred known genes and 500 novel sequences were discovered to be differentially expressed in these select tumor-derived libraries. Test genes were validated for expression specificity by reverse transcription-PCR, providing a proof of concept for gene discovery by DDD. A comprehensive database of hits can be accessed at http:// www.fau.edu/cmbb/publications/cancergenes. htm. This solid tumor DDD database should facilitate target identification for cancer diagnostics and therapeutics.

The benefits of support group participation to lung cancer survivors--an evaluation.

It has been known for some time that participation in support groups is beneficial for most cancer survivors. Despite this, and even though lung cancer causes more deaths than breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers combined, the number of support groups formed for lung cancer survivors is surprisingly very small. In an effort to understand the lack of lung cancer specific support groups, the Alliance for Lung Cancer Advocacy, Support, and Education (ALCASE) conducted a survey of the facilitators of the lung cancer support groups then known to be in existence in the United States, in addition to a follow-up focus group with the facilitators via teleconference. The results of the survey and the focus group provide a very preliminary look at the value to lung cancer survivors of participating in support groups organized specifically for them. However, much more research is required, not only with the participants of these groups, but also with lung cancer survivors who do not participate, to fully gauge the effects of support group participation on the progress of their disease and on their quality of life.

Evaluation of outcome by race in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Most studies of outcome by race in cancer have shown that blacks have a shorter survival compared to whites, both overall and within each TNM stage. We endeavored to evaluate the difference in survival by race in US military veterans treated for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This retrospective analysis of overall survival by race, looking at all-cause mortality in a group of consecutively treated veterans with stage I-II NSCLC, was carried out at a 1,000-bed tertiary care Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center. The study included 143 white and 45 black patients treated with curative intent for stage I-II NSCLC between January 1982 through August 1994. Nineteen patients received radiotherapy alone for their treatment while the remaining 169 underwent a complete surgical resection. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics for important prognostic variables. An overall survival analysis of all-cause mortality found no significant difference between the two groups. With equal access to health care, as is available for eligible patients in Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers, racial differences in lung cancer treatment outcome may be diminished or eliminated.

Results of a trial with topotecan dose escalation and concurrent thoracic radiation therapy for locally advanced, inoperable nonsmall cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To conduct a dose escalation clinical study with topotecan and concurrent standard dose thoracic irradiation to assess its feasibility and toxicity in the treatment of patients with locally advanced, inoperable nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLCA). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between April 1993 and August 1994, 12 patients with inoperable, loco-regionally advanced NSCLCA were entered in a prospective dose escalation trial and assigned to receive concurrent thoracic radiotherapy and topotecan. Patients received thoracic irradiation to a total tumor dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions. Initial fields were to encompass the gross disease plus the mediastinum. Topotecan was delivered by bolus injection days 1 through 5, and days 22 through 26, beginning on the same day as the radiation therapy. The initial dose level was 0.5 mg/m2. Two additional dose levels of 0.75 mg/m2 and 1.0 mg/m2 were tested. RESULTS: Six patients were accessioned to the 0.5 mg/m2 dose level, three patients to the 0.75 mg/m2 dose level, and three patients to the 1.0 mg/m2 dose level. At the 0.5 mg/m2 dose level, zero of six patients had > or = Grade 4 hematologic toxicity. One of the six had Grade 3 esophagitis. At the 0.75 mg/m2 dose level, two of three patients had > or = Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity including anorexia, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and weakness; zero patients experienced > or = Grade 4 hematologic toxicity. At the 1.0 mg/m2 dose level one of three patients had > or = Grade 3 esophagitis, and two of three patients experienced Grade 4 neutropenia. With a follow-up of 12 to 24 months, two patients are alive and free of disease, three patients are alive with disease (two with distant metastasis, one with local disease and distant metastasis), and the remaining seven patients are dead of disease. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of topotecan and thoracic radiotherapy for nonsmall lung cancer, in the manner given by this protocol, could be safely given at a dose level of only 0.5 mg/m2 days 1 to 5 and 22 to 26 with 60 Gy of external beam radiotherapy. Higher doses of topotecan were associated with high hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicity. Distant metastasis was the primary pattern of failure.

Multicenter phase II study of weekly oral vinorelbine for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: We initiated a large multicenter phase II trial in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to evaluate the activity and safety of an oral gelatin-based formation of vinorelbine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three centers participated in this uncontrolled phase II study, which accrued patients between August 1991 and March 1992. Eligible patients had previously untreated measurable or assessable stage IV NSCLC, age more than 18 years, and Karnofsky performance status > or = 70%. The treatment plan initially was to administer 100 mg/m2/wk of oral vinorelbine or 80 mg/m2/wk for patients who had received prior radiation therapy. After the observation of grade IV granulocytopenia in six of the first 25 patients, subsequent doses were reduced by 40 mg (one capsule) in all patients. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-two patients were treated: 138 with measurable and 24 with assessable disease. One hundred two patients were men and 60 women. The mean age was 62 years (range, 36 to 83). The overall response rate was 14.5% for patients with measurable disease (95% confidence interval, 9.3% to 21.7%). The median time to treatment failure (TTF) for all patients was 9 weeks. The median survival time was 29 weeks; the 1-year survival rate was 22%. Toxicities included grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 40%, which was dependent on the vinorelbine dose. Other toxicities included mild to moderate nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, and stomatitis. The mean dose intensity of vinorelbine was 53 mg/m2. CONCLUSION: Oral vinorelbine administered once weekly is an active agent in stage IV NSCLC. The median survival time of 29 weeks is similar to that achieved with single-agent intravenous vinorelbine and more aggressive cisplatin-based combinations. Further studies of this compound in the palliative-intent care setting appear to be indicated.

Oral vinorelbine (Navelbine) in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a preliminary report.

Vinorelbine (Navelbine; Burroughs Wellcome Co, Research Triangle Park, NC; Pierre Fabre Médicament, Paris, France) is a novel semisynthetic vinca alkaloid with antitumor activity in non-small cell lung cancer. An oral preparation of this drug is under investigation and was tested in a multicenter phase II study in patients with stage IV measurable or evaluable non-small cell lung cancer. The initial vinorelbine dose was 100 mg/m2/wk (80 mg/m2/wk for patients with prior radiotherapy). Following an initial 37% incidence of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, the dose was reduced by 40 mg/dose. Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and mucositis were other frequently observed toxicities. A preliminary analysis indicated a response rate of 14%, suggesting activity of this drug when administered orally.

Role of Adjuvant Therapy in Patients With Surgically Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Strategies to eradicate micrometastatic disease in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with postoperative chemotherapy, radiation, or immunotherapy have been under investigation for almost three decades, yet to date, these studies have shown negative or mixed results. Recently accumulated evidence of survival benefit rendered by neoadjuvant chemotherapy added to definitive radiation and perhaps surgery, and the emergence of several new active agents have stimulated interest in reevaluation of adjuvant therapy in NSCLC. Routine use of adjuvant therapy, however, cannot be recommended until results of ongoing and planned clinical trials document its benefit.