ABSTRACT
The aim of the present study was to explore the stigma and fear of getting sick in health professionals who treat people living with HIV. An exploratory systematic review was conducted. The search was limited to the presence of stigma and fear of getting sick on the part of healthcare workers who treat people living with HIV, documented by the health workers or patients themselves. No language restriction was made and systematic reviews, comments or communications were excluded. The sources of information were Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Direct, and the CENTRAL Registry, from the last 5 years. The quality of the evidence was assessed with an adapted tool and the synthesis of the results was carried out using a narrative synthesis approach. Twenty-three articles were included, which related structural stigma, stigma by health professionals and fear of getting sick. Among the findings, data stood out such as that more than 50% of patients reported having experienced discrimination due to HIV and even accumulated stigma for other additional causes. Stigma enacted in healthcare settings was related to suboptimal adherence to treatment (OR 1.38; 95% CI: 1.03-1.84; p=0.028). Stigma is a structural barrier in the care of people living with HIV and generates a psychological, physical, and social health impact for these people. Some limitations of the present study are that, despite searching the major databases, important manuscripts may have been left out. Additionally, there are regions that are not represented in this review because no manuscripts from those areas were found.
ABSTRACT
El adulto mayor, con frecuencia frágil, es un paciente susceptible a un sinnúmero de complicaciones, tanto inmediatas como a corto, mediano y largo plazo, posterior a una intervención quirúrgica. En función de las comorbilidades presentadas, se debe hacer un abordaje integral para alcanzar el mejor estado orgánico previo a la cirugía e intentar mantenerlo durante y posterior a la intervención. Considerar la fuerza estadística de los desenlaces negativos y, específicamente, de la mortalidad en adultos mayores sometidos a cirugía mayor, es verdaderamente un reto. Incluso, esto trasciende a otros campos como la bioética, al plantearse un dilema sobre la distanasia, cuando se recurre a ciertas intervenciones riesgosas en aquellos con un pronóstico de vida temeroso. Recientemente, se ha publicado evidencia interesante que ha estimado la incidencia, riesgo de mortalidad y factores asociados a desenlaces negativos en adultos mayores sometidos a cirugía mayor, planteando posibles modificaciones en los algoritmos de toma de decisiones en futuras guías de práctica clínica en cirugía. El objetivo de esta revisión consiste en analizar evidencia actualizada sobre qué factores de riesgo impactarían más sobre desenlaces negativos y mortalidad en el adulto mayor sometido a cirugía mayor. Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica utilizando los términos de búsqueda "Cirugía Mayor" y "Adulto Mayor", además de sinónimos, en las bases de datos PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science y MEDLINE. En cirugía general y subespecialidades, es muy complejo determinar factores de riesgo precisos y extrapolables a todos los escenarios quirúrgicos, debido a la complejidad y especificidad de ciertos órganos y procedimientos. Existe evidencia sobre adultos frágiles que son sometidos a cirugía por cáncer colorrectal, metástasis hepática, cáncer de pulmón, enfermedad pancreática y cáncer esofágico, en donde se registra una mayor estancia hospitalaria; y de forma general, la mortalidad es mayor en aquellos sometidos a cirugía oncológica. No obstante, tanto la integridad física como mental se asocian con peores desenlaces, y la prehabilitación quirúrgica podría impactar de manera positiva sobre esta situación, al mejorar la reserva funcional y tiempo de recuperación posquirúrgico.
The elderly, often frail, are patients susceptible to numerous complications, both immediate and in the short, medium and long term, following surgical interventions. Depending on their comorbidities, a comprehensive approach should be taken to achieve the best condition of the organs prior to surgery and attempt to maintain it during and after the intervention. Considering the statistical strength of negative outcomes, specifically mortality in elderly patients undergoing major surgery, is truly a challenge. This even extends to other fields such as bioethics, raising a dilemma about dysthanasia when resorting to certain risky interventions in those with a fearful life prognosis. Recently, interesting evidence estimating the incidence, mortality risk and factors associated with negative outcomes in elderly patients undergoing major surgery has been published, suggesting possible modifications in decision-making algorithms for future clinical practice guidelines in surgery. The objective of this review is to analyze updated evidence on which risk factors would have the greatest impact on negative outcomes and mortality in elderly patients undergoing major surgery. A literature search was conducted using the search terms "Major Surgery" and "Elderly," in addition to synonyms, in the PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science and MEDLINE databases. In general surgery and subspecialties, it is very complex to determine precise risk factors that can be extrapolated to all surgical scenarios due to the complexity and specificity of certain organs and procedures. Evidence has found that frail adults undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer, liver metastasis, lung cancer, pancreatic disease and esophageal cancer have the longest hospital stays, and overall mortality is higher in those undergoing oncologic surgery. However, both physical and mental integrity are associated with worse outcomes, and surgical prehabilitation could positively impact this situation by improving functional reserve and post-surgical recovery time.
