Total skin electron beam radiation in a pediatric patient with leukemia cutis: a case report.

Leukemia cutis, a form of extramedullary leukemia involving the skin, is a poor prognostic marker and indicator of imminent hematologic relapse and chemotherapeutic resistance in leukemia patients. Although total skin electron beam radiotherapy is commonly recommended for patients with leukemia cutis, its role and effectiveness remains unclear. Here we describe a 19-month-old infant with acute myelogenous leukemia first diagnosed at 15 months of age. It relapsed in her skin at 18 months of age, associated with raised hyperpigmented lesions on her chest and scalp. Radiation treatment to the total skin surface with radiation therapy resulted in relief of her symptoms before relapse in the bone marrow.

Dosimetric and toxicity comparison between prone and supine position IMRT for endometrial cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the dosimetric and toxicity differences between prone and supine position intensity-modulate radiotherapy in endometrial cancer patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy. METHODS: Forty-seven consecutive endometrial cancer patients treated with adjuvant RT were analyzed. Of these, 21 were treated in prone position and 26 in the supine position. Dose-volume histograms for normal tissue structures and targets were compared between the two groups. Acute and chronic toxicity were also compared between the cohorts. RESULTS: The percentage of volume receiving 10, 20, 30, 40, 45, and 50 Gy for small bowel was 89.5%, 69%, 33%, 12.2%, 5%, and 0% in the prone group and 87.5%, 62.7%, 26.4%, 8%, 4.3%, and 0% in the supine group, respectively. The difference was not statistically significant. The dose-volume histograms for bladder and rectum were also comparable, except for a slightly greater percentage of volume receiving 10 Gy (1.5%) and 20 Gy (5%) for the rectum in the prone group. Acute small bowel toxicities were Grade 1 in 7 patients and Grade 2 in 14 patients in the prone group vs. Grade 1 in 6 patients and Grade 2 in 19 patients in the supine group. Chronic toxicity was Grade 1 in 7 patients and Grade 3 in 1 patient in the prone group and Grade 1 in 5 patients in the supine group. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results suggest that no difference exists in the dose to the normal tissue and toxicity between prone and supine intensity-modulated radiotherapy for endometrial cancer. Longer follow-up and more outcome studies are needed to determine whether any differences exist between the two approaches.

Clinical outcome with adjuvant treatment of endometrial carcinoma using intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess local control and chronic toxicity with IMRT for adjuvant treatment of endometrial carcinoma. METHODS: Forty-seven patients with endometrial cancer were treated with adjuvant IMRT and HDR brachytherapy (HDRB). The external beam dose was between 45 and 50.4 Gy, and all patients received 10 Gy in 2 fractions of HDRB to the vaginal cuff. Eight of these patients were treated with extended field to include the paraaortic region. RESULTS: IMRT dosimetry showed excellent coverage of the planning target volume (PTV) with mean PTV 95, PTV 110 and PTV 120 of 97.8%, 8.2% and 0.9% respectively. At a median follow-up of 20 months, four patients have recurred at extra pelvic sites. No patient had pelvic recurrence. The treatment was well tolerated with late toxicities as follows: small bowel grade 1: 25%, rectal grade 1: 2% and bladder grade 1: 13%. One patient had grade 3 small bowel toxicity. The 3-year actuarial rate of grade 2 or greater toxicity, disease-free survival and overall survival rate were 3.3%, 84% and 90%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary analysis of IMRT for adjuvant treatment of endometrial carcinoma shows excellent local control and low toxicity. However, longer follow-up and more patients are needed to ascertain whether the benefits of IMRT treatment seen here translate into long-term reductions in toxicities and local recurrence.