Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 8(2): 283-291, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25596790

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the utility of ultrasound (US) guidance for transradial arterial access. BACKGROUND: US guidance has been demonstrated to facilitate vascular access, but has not been tested in a multicenter randomized fashion for transradial cardiac catheterization. METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial of 698 patients undergoing transradial cardiac catheterization. Patients were randomized to needle insertion with either palpation or real-time US guidance (351 palpation, 347 US). Primary endpoints were the number of forward attempts required for access, first-pass success rate, and time to access. RESULTS: The number of attempts was reduced with US guidance [mean: 1.65 ± 1.2 vs. 3.05 ± 3.4, p < 0.0001; median: 1 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1 to 2) vs. 2 (1 to 3), p < 0.0001] and the first-pass success rate improved (64.8% vs. 43.9%, p < 0.0001). The time to access was reduced (88 ± 78 s vs. 108 ± 112 s, p = 0.006; median: 64 [IQR: 45 to 94] s vs. 74 [IQR: 49 to 120] s, p = 0.01). Ten patients in the control group required crossover to US guidance after 5 min of failed palpation attempts with 8 of 10 (80%) having successful sheath insertion with US. The number of difficult access procedures was decreased with US guidance (2.4% vs. 18.6% for ≥5 attempts, p < 0.001; 3.7% vs. 6.8% for ≥5min, p = 0.07). No significant differences were observed in the rate of operator-reported spasm, patient pain scores following the procedure, or bleeding complications. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound guidance improves the success and efficiency of radial artery cannulation in patients presenting for transradial catheterization. (Radial Artery Access With Ultrasound Trial [RAUST]; NCT01605292).


Subject(s)
Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Radial Artery , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Female , Hemostatic Techniques , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Palpation , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Pharmacotherapy ; 24(5): 664-7, 2004 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15162901

ABSTRACT

The antiplatelet drug clopidogrel has largely replaced ticlopidine, due to an association between ticlopidine and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome (TTP-HUS). Clopidogrel at first was thought to be void of this potentially fatal adverse effect, but recent case reports have called that assumption into question. Even with proper treatment (plasma exchange), TTP-HUS can persist for weeks. Clinicians should be aware of this possible adverse effect because prompt therapy is imperative for patients' survival. Earlier reports of clopidogrel-related TTP-HUS have involved patients who had received at least 72 hours of therapy. We describe a case of TTP-HUS in a patient who had received only a 300-mg loading dose of clopidogrel.


Subject(s)
Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome/chemically induced , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Purpura, Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic/chemically induced , Ticlopidine/analogs & derivatives , Ticlopidine/adverse effects , Clopidogrel , Coronary Disease/therapy , Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome/complications , Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Purpura, Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic/complications , Purpura, Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic/physiopathology , Stents
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...