ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) predicts for higher rates of recurrence and increased mortality in endometrial cancer. Using 3-tier LVSI scoring, a PORTEC-1 and -2 trials analysis demonstrated that substantial LVSI was associated with worse locoregional (LR-DFS) and distant metastasis disease-free survival (DM-DFS), and these patients possibly benefited from external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Furthermore, LVSI is a predictor for lymph node (LN) involvement, but the significance of substantial LVSI is unknown in patients with a pathologically negative LN assessment. We aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes of these patients in relation to the 3-tier LVSI scoring system. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a single-institutional retrospective review of patients with stage I endometrioid-type endometrial cancer who underwent surgical staging with pathologically negative LN evaluation from 2017 to 2019 with 3-tier LVSI scoring (none, focal, or substantial). Clinical outcomes (LR-DFS, DM-DFS, and overall survival) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 335 patients with pathologically LN-negative stage I endometrioid-type endometrial carcinoma were identified. Substantial LVSI was present in 17.6% of patients; 39.7% of patients received adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy and 6.9% of patients received EBRT. Adjuvant radiation treatment varied by LVSI status. In patients with focal LVSI, 81.0% received vaginal brachytherapy. Among patients with substantial LVSI, 57.9% received vaginal brachytherapy alone, and 31.6% of patients received EBRT. The 2-year LR-DFS rates were 92.5%, 98.0%, and 91.4% for no LVSI, focal LVSI, and substantial LVSI, respectively. The 2-year DM-DFS rates were 95.5%, 93.3%, and 93.8% for no LVSI, focal LVSI, and substantial LVSI, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our institutional study, patients with pathologically LN-negative stage I endometrial cancer with substantial LVSI had similar rates of LR-DFS and DM-DFS compared with patients with none or focal LVSI. These findings highlight the need for multi-institutional studies to validate the prognostic value of substantial LVSI in this patient population.
Subject(s)
Brachytherapy , Endometrial Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Prognosis , Endometrial Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adjuvants, Immunologic , Disease-Free SurvivalABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the impact of right ventricular dysfunction on the outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 requiring veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. METHODS: Six academic centers conducted a retrospective analysis of mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 stratified by support with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during the first wave of the pandemic (March to August 2020). Echocardiograms performed for clinical indications were reviewed for right and left ventricular function. Baseline characteristics, hospitalization characteristics, and survival were compared. RESULTS: The cohort included 424 mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19, 126 of whom were cannulated for veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Right ventricular dysfunction was observed in 38.1% of patients who received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and 27.4% of patients who did not receive extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with an echocardiogram. Biventricular dysfunction was observed in 5.5% of patients who received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Baseline patient characteristics were similar in both the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and non-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cohorts stratified by the presence of right ventricular dysfunction. In the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cohort, right ventricular dysfunction was associated with increased inotrope use (66.7% vs 24.4%, P < .001), bleeding complications (77.1% vs 53.8%, P = .015), and worse survival independent of left ventricular dysfunction (39.6% vs 64.1%, P = .012). There was no significant difference in days ventilated before extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, length of hospital stay, hours on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, duration of mechanical ventilation, vasopressor use, inhaled pulmonary vasodilator use, infectious complications, clotting complications, or stroke. The cohort without extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cohort demonstrated no statistically significant differences in in-hospital outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of right ventricular dysfunction in patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome supported with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was associated with increased in-hospital mortality. Additional studies are required to determine if mitigating right ventricular dysfunction in patients requiring veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation improves mortality.
