What is the benefit of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy in patients with recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal malignancies?

The aim of this retrospective analysis was to investigate the efficacy and adverse effects of the monoclonal antivascular endothelial growth factor antibody bevacizumab (Avastin(R)) combined with chemotherapeutic agents in non-protocol patients with recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal malignancies. Using our databases, we identified patients treated with bevacizumab combination therapy since June 2005. Responses were evaluated with Response evaluation Criteria in Solid tumors and serum CA125 Rustin criteria. Toxicity was assessed according to the Common toxicity Criteria (CTC) v.3.0. Data from 64 patients were included. The median patient age was 58 years, and they had undergone a median of 4.5 (range, 1-10) prior cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens. The median length of follow-up was 8 months (range, 2-29). The most commonly used combinations were bevacizumab plus taxanes (26.6%) and plus cyclophosphamide (26.6%). A median of 4 cycles of therapy with a median bevacizumab dose of 3,600 mg (range, 500-18,240) were administered. An overall response rate of 21.3% was observed in 13 patients with partial response, and another 42.6% of patients had stable disease. Among the patients with elevated pretreatment serum CA125 concentration, an overall response rate of 46.3% (25/54) was observed according to modification of the Rustin criteria. Fifteen (23.4%) patients had grades 3 or 4 adverse events. Gastrointestinal perforations occurred in 2 (3.1%) patients. Seventeen (26.6%) patients had improved performance status scores. Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy showed promising clinical benefits, with significant response of serum CA125 concentration and moderate adverse effects.

Ovarian endometriosis associated with carcinoma and sarcoma: case report.

Endometriosis is a common clinical disorder that shares certain characteristics, metastasis and recurrence, with malignant neoplasms. Most malignant ovarian tumors arising from endometriosis are clear cell carcinoma or endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Few reports exist of sarcoma associated with endometriosis, and even fewer exist of multiple types of malignancies occurring simultaneously. Here, we report the case of a 32-year-old woman who presented with infertility and a pelvic mass. She underwent exploratory laparotomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. She was then referred to our institution for treatment recommendation. The pathologic findings revealed bilateral endometrioid adenofibroma of low malignant potential, which was associated with endometrioid intraepithelial carcinoma in the left ovary and high-grade sarcoma in the right ovary. Both tumors seemed to have arisen from endometriosis. She was treated with 75 mg/m2 of doxorubicin and 10 g/m2 of ifosfamide every three weeks for eight courses. She was later found to have bilateral brain metastases, which were resected and treated by whole-brain irradiation. She was again treated with doxorubicin and ifosfamide. The optimal treatment for endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer depends on the type of malignancy; simultaneously occurring multiple tumor types should be treated individually.

Erosive osteoarthritis during treatment with bevacizumab and paclitaxel in a patient with recurrent papillary serous carcinoma of the ovary.

Bevacizumab (BVC) is currently used in recurrent ovarian cancer and as part of the initial treatment for ovarian cancer. The most serious toxicities associated with BVC include gastrointestinal perforations, delayed wound healing, and hemorrhage. Arthritis had never been addressed in patients who received BVC treatment. This is the first case report of arthritis emergence linked to BVC administration. A 59-year-old female with recurrent ovarian cancer received multiple hormonal and cytotoxic regimens for 5 years and then developed erosive osteoarthritis of the hands secondary to BVC and paclitaxel. This effect was confirmed by a significant improvement in her symptoms and signs, after treatment was discontinued.

Tamoxifen is safe and effective in gynecological cancer patients with renal dysfunction.

Tamoxifen has been found to be safe and effective in gynecological cancer patients with normal renal function. However, to our knowledge, no data exist regarding its effectiveness and toxicity in gynecological cancer patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated the effects of tamoxifen in patients with recurrent gynecological cancer and CKD. We collected clinical and demographic data for all patients. CKD was defined as a creatinine clearance (CrCl) level of less than 90 mL/min/1.73 m(2), in accordance with the National Kidney Foundation Kidney and Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative, and further categorized as mild, moderate, or severe (CrCl levels of 60-89, 30-59, and <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively). Twenty-nine patients were included in the study--22 with epithelial ovarian cancer, 4 with peritoneal cancer, and 3 with fallopian tube cancer. Thirteen patients had mild CKD, 13 had moderate, and 3 had severe. Most patients had been treated with 20 mg/day of tamoxifen every 4 weeks. The median duration of treatment was 5 months (range, 1-52 months). The overall complete response, partial response, stable disease, and disease progression rates were 0%, 10%, 41%, and 48%, respectively. Twenty-one percent of patients experienced hot flashes, and 7% experienced nausea. No major adverse reactions occurred. These findings were similar to those for gynecological cancer patients with normal renal function. In conclusion, 20 mg/day of tamoxifen is safe and effective in gynecological cancer patients with CKD.