Left ventricular reverse remodeling after annular-mitral valve repair in end-stage heart failure of dilated cardiomyopathy: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: There are numerous patients with functional mitral regurgitation resulting from dilated cardiomyopathy. The decision between surgical correction and medical management of severe mitral regurgitation in heart failure is often difficult. CASE PRESENTATION: This is a 38-year-old women presented with recurrent symptoms of congestive heart failure. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed a dilated cardiomyopathy with global severe left ventricular dysfunction and severe functional mitral valve regurgitation. She underwent a mitral valve restrictive annuloplasty. The follow-up showed an improved of left ventricle dimensions and function. DISCUSSION: The novel annular repair techniques have an obvious potential to improve long-term competence of Mitral Valve Repair. Therefore, they could be considered as a viable therapeutic option in patients presenting with end-stage cardiomyopathy with severe mitral regurgitation. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrate the reverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling after effective mitral valve repair in advanced dilated cardiomyopathy and its impact on clinical outcome and repair durability.

An Unusual Cause of Neonatal Heart Failure.

Hypertension is an important and under-recognized cause of acquired cardiomyopathy in newborns. Half the etiologies of neonatal hypertension are undetermined. We present a rare case of severe neonatal hypertension with ventricular dysfunction secondary to substance exposure during pregnancy. This case report emphasizes the importance of a well-focused prenatal history on maternal medications and substance use.

Diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease using computed tomography angiography in patients with stable chest pain depending on clinical probability and in clinically important subgroups: meta-analysis of individual patient data.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) should be performed in patients with any clinical probability of coronary artery disease (CAD), and whether the diagnostic performance differs between subgroups of patients. DESIGN: Prospectively designed meta-analysis of individual patient data from prospective diagnostic accuracy studies. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, and Web of Science for published studies. Unpublished studies were identified via direct contact with participating investigators. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Prospective diagnostic accuracy studies that compared coronary CTA with coronary angiography as the reference standard, using at least a 50% diameter reduction as a cutoff value for obstructive CAD. All patients needed to have a clinical indication for coronary angiography due to suspected CAD, and both tests had to be performed in all patients. Results had to be provided using 2×2 or 3×2 cross tabulations for the comparison of CTA with coronary angiography. Primary outcomes were the positive and negative predictive values of CTA as a function of clinical pretest probability of obstructive CAD, analysed by a generalised linear mixed model; calculations were performed including and excluding non-diagnostic CTA results. The no-treat/treat threshold model was used to determine the range of appropriate pretest probabilities for CTA. The threshold model was based on obtained post-test probabilities of less than 15% in case of negative CTA and above 50% in case of positive CTA. Sex, angina pectoris type, age, and number of computed tomography detector rows were used as clinical variables to analyse the diagnostic performance in relevant subgroups. RESULTS: Individual patient data from 5332 patients from 65 prospective diagnostic accuracy studies were retrieved. For a pretest probability range of 7-67%, the treat threshold of more than 50% and the no-treat threshold of less than 15% post-test probability were obtained using CTA. At a pretest probability of 7%, the positive predictive value of CTA was 50.9% (95% confidence interval 43.3% to 57.7%) and the negative predictive value of CTA was 97.8% (96.4% to 98.7%); corresponding values at a pretest probability of 67% were 82.7% (78.3% to 86.2%) and 85.0% (80.2% to 88.9%), respectively. The overall sensitivity of CTA was 95.2% (92.6% to 96.9%) and the specificity was 79.2% (74.9% to 82.9%). CTA using more than 64 detector rows was associated with a higher empirical sensitivity than CTA using up to 64 rows (93.4% v 86.5%, P=0.002) and specificity (84.4% v 72.6%, P<0.001). The area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve for CTA was 0.897 (0.889 to 0.906), and the diagnostic performance of CTA was slightly lower in women than in with men (area under the curve 0.874 (0.858 to 0.890) v 0.907 (0.897 to 0.916), P<0.001). The diagnostic performance of CTA was slightly lower in patients older than 75 (0.864 (0.834 to 0.894), P=0.018 v all other age groups) and was not significantly influenced by angina pectoris type (typical angina 0.895 (0.873 to 0.917), atypical angina 0.898 (0.884 to 0.913), non-anginal chest pain 0.884 (0.870 to 0.899), other chest discomfort 0.915 (0.897 to 0.934)). CONCLUSIONS: In a no-treat/treat threshold model, the diagnosis of obstructive CAD using coronary CTA in patients with stable chest pain was most accurate when the clinical pretest probability was between 7% and 67%. Performance of CTA was not influenced by the angina pectoris type and was slightly higher in men and lower in older patients. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42012002780.

Pulmonary Atresia With Ventriculocoronary Arterial Connections and a Large Conoventricular Septal Defect.

Ventriculocoronary arterial connections are typically found in patients with pulmonary atresia with an intact ventricular septum. This report describes a case of ventriculocoronary arterial connections in a patient with pulmonary atresia with a ventricular septal defect. Our case supports recent data suggesting a primary coronary artery developmental anomaly in pulmonary atresia. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Correction to: Applicability and accuracy of pretest probability calculations implemented in the NICE clinical guideline for decision making about imaging in patients with chest pain of recent onset.

The original version of this article, published on 19 March 2018, unfortunately contained a mistake. The following correction has therefore been made in the original: The names of the authors Philipp A. Kaufmann, Ronny Ralf Buechel and Bernhard A. Herzog were presented incorrectly.

Applicability and accuracy of pretest probability calculations implemented in the NICE clinical guideline for decision making about imaging in patients with chest pain of recent onset.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the implementation, applicability and accuracy of the pretest probability calculation provided by NICE clinical guideline 95 for decision making about imaging in patients with chest pain of recent onset. METHODS: The definitions for pretest probability calculation in the original Duke clinical score and the NICE guideline were compared. We also calculated the agreement and disagreement in pretest probability and the resulting imaging and management groups based on individual patient data from the Collaborative Meta-Analysis of Cardiac CT (CoMe-CCT). RESULTS: 4,673 individual patient data from the CoMe-CCT Consortium were analysed. Major differences in definitions in the Duke clinical score and NICE guideline were found for the predictors age and number of risk factors. Pretest probability calculation using guideline criteria was only possible for 30.8 % (1,439/4,673) of patients despite availability of all required data due to ambiguity in guideline definitions for risk factors and age groups. Agreement regarding patient management groups was found in only 70 % (366/523) of patients in whom pretest probability calculation was possible according to both models. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that pretest probability calculation for clinical decision making about cardiac imaging as implemented in the NICE clinical guideline for patients has relevant limitations. KEY POINTS: • Duke clinical score is not implemented correctly in NICE guideline 95. • Pretest probability assessment in NICE guideline 95 is impossible for most patients. • Improved clinical decision making requires accurate pretest probability calculation. • These refinements are essential for appropriate use of cardiac CT.

Stent thrombosis after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Are the new P2Y12 inhibitors really more effective than clopidogrel?

AIM: High rates of stent thrombosis (ST) have been reported in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) who require a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this study was to assess risk factors of ST in this population with a special focus on antiplatelet therapy administered during the acute phase. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study in patients treated with primary PCI after OHCA between 2011 and 2013 in our center. All consecutive patients were treated with mild therapeutic hypothermia and dual antiplatelet therapy after primary angioplasty. RESULTS: A total of 101 consecutive patients were included in the present analysis. Mean age was 61.3 ± 12.7 years and 75% of patients had an initial ventricular fibrillation. All patients received aspirin before PCI. P2Y12 inhibitors were administered after PCI and included clopidogrel (47.5%), prasugrel (21.8%) or ticagrelor (29.7%). The survival rate at discharge was 44.5%. We identified 11 cases (10.9%) of definite or probable ST (clopidogrel (n=2), prasugrel (n=4) and ticagrelor (n=5)) occurring at a median of 2 days after PCI. No specific predictors were found to be significantly associated with ST. New P2Y12 inhibitors were associated with more ST compared to clopidogrel (17.3% vs. 4.2%; respectively, p=0.05). ST was associated with a decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (p=0.007) and with a trend toward a higher mortality compared to patients without ST (82% vs. 52%, p=0.06). CONCLUSION: The incidence of ST in OHCA survivors is high and associated with poor clinical outcome. The use of new oral P2Y12 inhibitors does not appear to be associated with a reduction in ST compared to clopidogrel.

Accuracy of multislice computed tomography in the preoperative assessment of coronary disease in patients scheduled for heart valve surgery.

BACKGROUND: Coronary angiography (CA), an invasive and expensive procedure, is still recommended in most patients referred for elective valve surgery. Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) is a promising alternative technique to rule out significant coronary artery lesions. AIM: To evaluate MSCT in detecting significant coronary artery lesions in patients referred for elective valve surgery. METHODS: Between August 2007 and December 2010, patients referred for elective valve surgery were identified prospectively and underwent 64-slice MSCT and CA. We compared significant coronary stenoses, defined as a reduction of luminal diameter ≥ 50%, to establish the diagnostic accuracy of MSCT. All coronary segments were analysed and uninterpretable lesions were scored positive. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included (62.5% male; mean age 65 ± 12 years), the majority had aortic insufficiency (37.7%) or aortic stenosis (32.0%). The prevalence of significant coronary artery stenoses was 27.1%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of MSCT were 77%, 89%, 71% and 91%, respectively, in a patient-based analysis; 82%, 86%, 64% and 94% in a revascularization-based analysis; 67%, 94%, 52% and 97% in a vessel-based analysis; and 65%, 98%, 52% and 99% in a segment-based analysis. Overall, CA could have been avoided in 65% of patients. CONCLUSION: In patients referred for elective valve surgery, MSCT had a high diagnostic accuracy to rule out significant coronary stenoses. However, larger multicenter studies in an unselected population of patients are needed to determine its place within the range of diagnostic tool in the preoperative assessment of valvular heart disease.