Tranexamic Acid for Bleeding Management in Adult Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

This study described the outcomes of patients receiving topical, nebulized, endobronchial, or systemic tranexamic acid (TXA) for bleeding events while on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We performed a single-center case series including adult patients >18 years old supported on either venovenous (VV) or venoarterial (VA) ECMO from January 1, 2014, to April 21, 2021. The primary outcome was hemostatic control defined as a composite of initial cessation of therapeutic interventions to mitigate bleeding or resumption of anticoagulation if previously held. Secondary outcomes included changes in transfusion requirements and lysis at 30-minute (LY30) values, venous thromboembolism (VTE) events, and seizures. In total, 47 patients were included for full analysis. There were 19 patients with surgical bleeds, 18 patients with medical bleeds, and 10 patients with multiple bleeds. Overall, initial hemostatic control was achieved in 79%, 67%, and 90% of patients, respectively. Pre- and post-TXA transfusion requirements were not significantly different ( p = 0.2), although the intraindividual change in median LY30 was -5.1% compared with baseline (95% confidence interval [CI], -12.4% to -1.5%, p = 0.005). The occurrence of VTE and seizures was relatively low and similar among patient bleeding groups. Tranexamic acid provided initial hemostatic control in roughly three quarters of patients with bleeding events on ECMO and side effects were infrequent.

Appraising the use of tranexamic acid in traumatic and non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage: A narrative review.

Recently there has been increasing interest and debate on the use of tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic drug, in both traumatic and non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage. In this review we aim to discuss recent investigations looking at TXA in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and different categories of spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage. We also discuss differences between setting (hospital vs pre-hospital), dosing and timing strategies, and other logistical challenges surrounding optimal use of TXA for isolated intracranial hemorrhage. Last, we hope to provide guidance for clinicians when considering the use of TXA in a patient with traumatic or non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage based on appraisal of the available literature as well as some potential ideas for future research in this area.

Influence of Timing and Catecholamine Requirements on Vasopressin Responsiveness in Critically ill Patients with Septic Shock.

Introduction: Despite its widespread use, there is a paucity of data to guide the optimal use of arginine vasopressin (AVP) in critically ill patients with septic shock. Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study conducted in critically ill adults sought to evaluate the role of catecholamine requirements and timing on responsiveness to AVP. Responsiveness was defined as both a decrease in ≥ 50% of catecholamine requirements and no decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 4 hours post-AVP initiation. Primary outcomes of interest included the proportion of patients who started AVP within 4 hours after starting catecholamine therapy, as well as baseline norepinephrine (NE) equivalents (< 15, 15-39, or ≥ 40 mcg/min). Multivariate analyses and logistic regression were performed to identify other factors associated with AVP responsiveness. Results: There were 300 patients included in this study, with 74 patients being responders and 226 being non-responders. There was no significant difference in the number of patients who received AVP within 4 hours from catecholamine initiation between responders and non-responders (35% vs. 42%, P = 0.29). There were more patients in the non-responder group requiring ≥ 40 mcg/min of NE equivalents at AVP initiation (30% vs. 16%, P = 0.023). Stress dose steroid use was less common in responders (35% vs. 52%, P = 0.011), which was consistent with logistic regression analysis (OR 0.56, 95% 0.32-0.98, P = 0.044). Clinical outcomes between responders and non-responders were similar, apart from ICU (5.4% vs. 19.5%) and hospital (5.4% vs. 20.4%) mortality being lower in responders (P = 0.0032 and P = 0.0002, respectively). Conclusion: Shorter times to AVP initiation was not associated with responsiveness at 4 hours post-catecholamine initiation, although non-responders tended to require higher doses of NE equivalents at time of AVP initiation. Concomitant corticosteroids were associated with a lower likelihood of AVP responsiveness.

Apixaban and rivaroxaban anti-Xa level utilization for guidance of administration of andexanet alfa: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Andexanet alfa, a modified recombinant factor Xa (FXa), was FDA approved in 2018 for anticoagulant reversal in patients with life-threatening bleeding associated with FXa inhibitors (FXaI). The ANNEXA-4 investigators administered andexanet alfa to patients within an 18-h from last dose of oral FXaI. In practice, time from last dose is often unknown. Previous studies have shown that clearance of these agents may be impaired by renal and hepatic dysfunction, as well as drug-drug interactions. Decision for use of andexanet alfa is also complicated by its high cost, limited drug availability, and thrombotic risk. This study aimed to describe the utility of anti-Xa DOAC levels as a decision point to administer andexanet alfa. METHODS: This is a case series of four patients with an anti-Xa DOAC level that received andexanet alfa for oral FXaI reversal in the setting of life-threatening bleeding or prior to procedure. RESULTS: Four patients were included in the study. Two patients had a known time since last dose of oral FXaI. All patients had a detectable anti-Xa DOAC levels prior to administration of andexanet alfa. Two patients had levels within the peak range, one patient had a level below the peak range, and one patient had a level above the peak range. Andexanet alfa was administered after anti-Xa DOAC level return in all patients. CONCLUSION: In our case series, obtaining anti-Xa DOAC levels prior to administration of andexanet alfa was achievable and facilitated use of reversal agents in patients with major bleeding or emergent procedural need.

Clinical Outcomes Following Tocilizumab Administration in Mechanically Ventilated Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients.

Effective treatments for the critically ill patient with novel coronavirus disease 2019 are desperately needed. Given the role of cytokine release syndrome in the pathogenesis of coronavirus disease 2019-associated respiratory distress, therapies aimed at mitigating cytokine release, such as the interleukin-6 receptor-inhibiting monoclonal antibody tocilizumab, represent potential treatment strategies. Therefore, we examined the outcomes of critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 patients treated with tocilizumab and factors associated with clinical improvement. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort analysis of 21-day outcomes for consecutive mechanically ventilated patients treated with tocilizumab from March 24, 2020, to May 4, 2020. SETTING: Nine ICUs at six hospitals within a hospital system in Houston, Texas, United States. PATIENTS: The first 62 coronavirus disease 2019 patients on invasive mechanical ventilation who were treated with tocilizumab, which was considered for all patients with severe disease. INTERVENTIONS: Tocilizumab was administered either at a weight-based dose of 4-8 mg/kg or at a flat dose of 400 mg, with repeat administration in some patients at the physician's discretion. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcomes were mortality and clinical improvement, defined as extubation. By day 21 post-tocilizumab, clinical improvement occurred in 36 patients (58%) and 13 patients (21%) died. In both univariable and multivariable analyses, age less than 60 years was associated with clinical improvement. Transient transaminitis was the most common adverse reaction, occurring in 25 patients (40%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on clinical outcomes and mortality rates seen in previous reports of mechanically ventilated patients, tocilizumab, as part of the management strategy for severe coronavirus disease 2019, represents a promising option. These findings support the need for evaluation of tocilizumab in a randomized controlled trial.

Apixaban and rivaroxaban anti-Xa level utilization and associated bleeding events within an academic health system.

BACKGROUND: Oral factor Xa inhibitors (FXaI) can be administered in fixed doses without the need for routine laboratory monitoring. Anti-Xa assays can estimate anticoagulant effect for specific FXaI's. The aim of this study was to characterize anti-Xa levels in patients taking apixaban or rivaroxaban with major bleeding events. METHODS: Apixaban and rivaroxaban anti-Xa assays ordered within our hospital system from May 2016 to September 2019 were evaluated. The primary outcome was major bleeding events defined by International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria. Median anti-Xa levels for each FXaI were calculated for those with and without major bleeding, as well as those who did and did not receive reversal agents. RESULTS: A total of 606 anti-Xa levels were analyzed. There were 146 major bleeding events documented, with the most common site being intracranial (63%). Median anti-Xa levels in patients with and without major bleeding were similar, whereas those on apixaban therapy who received reversal agents typically had higher anti-Xa levels (73 ng/mL vs. 153 ng/mL, p = 0.0019). Factors significantly associated with increased odds of bleeding were an age > 80 years, inappropriately high dosing regimens, and modest anti-Xa levels (100-300 ng/mL) for rivaroxaban specifically. CONCLUSIONS: Older age and inappropriately high dosing regimens were associated with major bleeding in patients taking apixaban and rivaroxaban. Further investigation into the utility of anti-Xa levels for FXaI is warranted.

Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Digital Subtraction Angiography for Postclipping Aneurysm Obliteration Detection.

Background and Purpose- Digital subtraction angiography has been used as the gold standard to confirm successful aneurysmal obliteration after aneurysm clipping procedures using titanium or cobalt alloy clips. Computed tomographic angiography is a newer, less invasive imaging technique also used to confirm successful aneurysmal obliteration; however, its use compared with digital subtraction angiography remains controversial. Methods- A comprehensive literature search was conducted on Pubmed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases through November 6, 2017, for studies that evaluated postclipping aneurysm obliteration with both computed tomographic angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) were calculated using the bivariate random-effects model. Results- Out of 6916 studies, 13 studies met inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis. A total of 510 patients with 613 aneurysms were included. Compared with digital subtraction angiography, which detected 87 residual aneurysms, computed tomographic angiography detected 58 resulting in a pooled sensitivity of 69% (95% CI, 54%-81%) and a pooled specificity of 99% (95% CI, 97%-99%). This corresponded to LR+ of 55.5 (95% CI, 23.6-130.9) and LR- of 0.31 (95% CI, 0.20-0.48). Univariate meta-regression revealed that the pooled sensitivity was worse in prospective designs ( P interaction <0.05), and the pooled specificity was better in higher-quality studies and for postoperative aneurysm diameters of <2 mm ( P interaction <0.001 for both). Conclusions- This meta-analysis revealed that computed tomographic angiography had a favorable LR+ but not a favorable LR-. Thus, this imaging modality may be applicable to rule in, but not rule out, residual aneurysms after clipping.