[Registry Research Funding of the German Society of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery (DGPRÄC) and Research Funding Report 2021/2022]. / Register Forschungsförderung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Plastische, Rekonstruktive und Ästhetische Chirurgie (DGPRÄC) und Forschungsförderungs-Bericht 2021/2022.

BACKGROUND: Research is an integral part of academic medicine. In plastic surgery, it sets the course for innovations in the specialty. The purpose of this study is to present the research performance of plastic surgeons in Germany for the period 2021/2022 and to compare it with previous periods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The directors of plastic surgical academic institutions reported all requested/approved and rejected research applications to public, non-public and industrial funding organizations. Data was gathered within an established online database. In addition, the DFG´s public database GEPRIS was screened for plastic surgical research grants. Data was also collected regarding research infrastructure and organization at the participating centers. RESULTS: 105 applications were reported to 54 different funding agencies from 20 plastic surgery centers. 37 funding applications were submitted to the major public funding agencies DFG, BMBF, BMWi, BMG, BMVg, G-BA and EU. Of these, 59,5% (22/37) were DFG, 13,5% (5/37) each BMBF and EU, 5,4% (2/37) BMWi, and 2,7% (1/37) each BMG, BMVg, and G-BA applications. The average funding volume of these proposals was 401,515 euros. Approved DFG proposals were most frequently assigned to the review board 205-27 Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery, Reconstructive Surgery (n=10/16, 62,5%). Over time, the research registry shows an increase in the number of proposals in general and those granted. 70,0% (14/20) of participating sites had their own experimental research laboratory, while only 40,0% (8/20) had their own clinical trial center. CONCLUSION: The 2021/2022 Research Funding Report once again highlights the impressive research accomplishments of the plastic surgery community.

[Registry Research Funding of the German Society of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (DGPRÄC) and Research Funding Report 2019/2020]. / Register Forschungsförderung der Deutschen Gesellschaft der Plastischen, Rekonstruktiven und Ästhetischen Chirurgen (DGPRÄC) und Forschungsförderungsbericht 2019/2020.

BACKGROUND: Since 2015/16 the DGPRÄC collects, evaluates and publishes the research activities of academic sections, departments and clinics for plastic surgery at university hospitals in Germany, in order to raise the awareness of plastic surgical research performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The directors of plastic surgical academic institutions were contacted via the DGPRÄC and asked to report any requested/approved and rejected research applications to public, non-public and industrial funding organizations. Data was collected in our previously established online database: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSe6F5xmTyw-k7VKJx_2jkPA4LBXsA0sgBGMrC3rx_4bHj6uzQ/viewform?usp=sf_link. In addition, applications were identified via the DFG's public database GEPRIS. RESULTS: A total of 41 funding applications to the public funding institutes DFG, BMBF, BMWi, BMG and EU were identified. 75.6 % (31/41) of the applications had already been approved at the time of data collection, of which 77.4 % (24/31) were DFG, 9.7 % (3/31) were BMWi, 6.5 % (2/31) were EU and 3.2 % (1/31) were BMBF or BMG applications. The average funding amounted to 358 301 Euro. In 50.0 % (12/24) of the cases, the approved DFG proposals were assigned to the subject review board 205-27 Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery, Reconstructive Surgery. CONCLUSION: The continuous publication of plastic surgical research funding reports submitted by the convention of university plastic surgeons of the DGPRÄC portraits the excellent, collaborative research activity in the field of plastic surgery.

[Registry Research Funding of the German Society of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (DGPRÄC) and Research Funding Report 2017/2018]. / Register Forschungsförderung der Deutschen Gesellschaft der Plastischen, Rekonstruktiven und Ästhetischen Chirurgen (DGPRÄC) und Forschungsförderungs-Bericht 2017/2018.

INTRODUCTION: This report serves to publicize the research of academic institutions for Plastic Surgery within our society DGPRÄC in 2017/2018 and sequels the funding report of 2015/2016. Applications to public, non-public, or industrial funding organizations were evaluated. At the same time, this paper analyses the number of approved DFG applications in Plastic, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery in the GEPRIS system. Contrary to these specialties, Plastic Surgery is not classified as an independent speciality in the subject structure of the DFG review board which results in a lack of transparency concerning Plastic Surgery research work. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our previously established online database (https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1OaSnHyKTysawiI1ie7kfUxDf7nJP_RiTUJTsnb7Mq_E/edit) for reporting requested/ approved and rejected research applications to public, non-public and industrial funding organizations was continued and evaluated together with applications found in the DFG's public database GEPRIS. RESULTS: Compared to the previous year's report, the number of approved applications from public research organizations (DFG, BMBF, BMWi, EU) was increased from 23 to 27. We identified 19 approved DFG applications from Plastic Surgery, as compared to 9 and 8 applications by Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, respectively. SUMMARY: Taken together, this data emphasizes that our research is at least equal to that of other newly established surgical specialties within the framework of the DFG. Accordingly, we hope to provide further arguments for an adaptation of the DFG review boards subject structure to include Plastic Surgery as an independent specialty as it is for Vascular Surgery and Thoracic Surgery.

[Registry Research Funding of the German Society of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (DGPRÄC) and Research Funding Report 2015/2016]. / Register Forschungsförderung der Deutschen Gesellschaft der Plastischen, Rekonstruktiven und Ästhetischen Chirurgen (DGPRÄC) und Forschungsförderungs-Bericht 2015/2016.

In addition to the impact factor, research funding also plays a central role in evaluating the academic performance and quality of a researcher, a clinic or a surgical specialty. The scope and quality of research in Plastic Surgery are usually very little known, so that even large funding institutions do not get a full view of research funding in our specialty. Therefore, sometimes traditional structures are not adapted to new needs by the developing younger surgical fields. In peer review sometimes peers are not chosen from the same surgical specialty, but from a different surgical fields being peers in large field of surgery. By this a bias can easily be generated which would not be advantageous for subspecialties such Plastic Surgery. The goal of this paper is to establish an overview in the form of a registry of the German Society of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (DGPRÄC) in order to make the joint academic achievements more visible in the future. At the same time, a research funding report is to be published for the years 2015 and 2016.

[Surgical treatment of ulnar collateral ligament injuries of the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint]. / Operative Behandlung der ulnaren Seitenbandläsion am Daumengrundgelenk.

OBJECTIVE: Reconstruction of the ruptured ulnar collateral ligament of the metacarpophalangeal (MP) joint of the thumb. INDICATIONS: Ruptured ulnar collateral ligament of the thumb MP joint with instability: joint opening of more than 30° in flexion and more than 20° in extension, Stener lesion, displaced avulsion fractures. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Abrasions, wound-healing disturbance, skin disease, osteoarthritis. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Curved skin incision dorsoulnar above the thumb MP joint. Protection of the branches of the superficial radial nerve. Incision of the adductor aponeurosis. Exposing the ulnar collateral ligament; opening and examination of the joint. Depending on the injury, primary suture repair, transosseous suture, repair with a bone anchor, osteosynthesis with K-wires or small screws in avulsion fracture, ligament reconstruction in chronic instability or older injury. POSTOPERATIVE TREATMENT: Cast splint of the MP joint until swelling subsides; cast immobilization for 6 weeks; range-of-motion exercises, avoiding forced radial deviation of the MP joint for 3 months. RESULTS: Complete joint stability 3 months postoperatively in all 34 patients with rupture of the ulnar collateral ligament.

[Percutaneous screw fixation of non- or minimally displaced scaphoid fractures]. / Perkutane kanülierte Verschraubung nicht- oder minimal-dislozierter Skaphoidfrakturen.

OBJECTIVE: Providing stability and reduction of the period of immobilisation of non- or minimally displaced scaphoid fractures using a minimally invasive technique. INDICATIONS: Scaphoid fractures of the types A2, B1 and B2 (Herbert's classification) with no or minimal displacement, along with a patient's request for early functional treatment. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Relative contraindications: significant dislocation of the fracture, scaphoid cyst or a too proximal fracture, concomitant fractures of the wrist. Absolute contraindications: pseudoarthrosis, luxation fractures. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Minimally invasive percutaneous screw fixation using a double threaded screw. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Postoperative immobilisation in a plaster cast with a thumb inlay for 1-3 weeks until swelling and pain subside. Followed by active physiotherapeutic exercise, however no pressure on the hand for 6 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: Seventy patients with a non- or a minimally displaced scaphoid fracture were treated between 2005 and 2011. We used percutaneous screw fixation as the therapy technique. A total of 57 patients (81%) presented for follow-up. Four patients (5.7%) had an unhealed fracture 6 months postsurgery confirmed. One patient needed revision surgery because of a screw that was too long. None of the patients had a postsurgical infection, haematoma or a complex regional pain syndrome. Smoking and putting pressure on the hand too early have been identified as possible risk factors for the unhealed fractures.

[Osteoconductive behaviour of beta-tricalcium phosphate ceramics in osteoporotic, metaphyseal bone defects of the distal radius]. / Osteokonduktive Eigenschaften von Beta-Trikalzium-phosphat in osteoporotischen, metaphysären Radiusdefekten.

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of osteoporotic distal radius fractures with locking plates does not completely prevent loss of reduction. Additional bone deficit stabilisation with the use of bone substitute materials is receiving increased attention. Most knowledge on the in vivo behavior of bone substitutes originates from a small number of animal models after its implantation in young, good vascularized bone. PURPOSE: This paper investigates the osteoconductivity, resorption and biocompatibility of beta-tricalcium phosphate as a temporary bone replacement in osteoporotic type distal radius fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 15 bone samples taken from the augmented area of the distal radius of elderly people during metal removal were examined. RESULTS: The material was found to be osteoconductive, good degradable, and biocompatible. Degrading process and remodelling to woven bone seem to require more time than in available comparative bioassays. CONCLUSIONS: The material is suitable for temporary replacement of lost, distal radius bone from the histological point of view.

[The distally based adipofascial sural artery flap for the reconstruction of distal lower extremity defects]. / Der distal gestielte adipofasziale Suralislappen zur Rekonstruktion von Defekten der distalen unteren Extremität.

OBJECTIVE: Problematic tissue defects in the distal one-third of the lower leg represent a special challenge for the operative therapy. The distally based adipofascial sural artery flap is a safe and effective modification of the classical fasciocutaneous sural artery flap technique and makes the reconstruction in this problematic area more feasible. The surgical aim is soft tissue reconstruction with local tissue avoiding free tissue transfer. INDICATIONS: Complex or chronic wounds (maximum width of 8 cm) of the distal lower leg with exposed bone, joints, tendons, and/or neurovascular structures, especially in cases of missing skin perforators. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Arterial vascular disease (stage III-IV), especially peroneal artery occlusion. Postthrombotic syndrome with occlusion of the small saphenous vein. Chronic lymphedema. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Preparation of the vascular pedicle of the distally based flap (including small saphenous vein, sural artery and nerve), the adjacent crural fascia and the subcutaneous fat without a skin island. The pivot point is about 6 cm cranial to the malleolus lateralis. The flap can be raised proximally up to the heads of the gastrocnemius muscle. After harvesting the flap there will be a change in blood flow direction in the small saphenous vein. The donor site can be closed primarily. The flap is covered with meshed split skin graft at the end of surgery. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Strict elevation of the extremity for 5 days, then flap conditioning. RESULTS: Between 1997 and 2012, this technique was used in 104 consecutive patients with soft tissue defects in the distal one-third of the lower leg. Flap survival was achieved 91 patients. In 2 patients amputation of the lower leg was necessary at the mid tibia level. In 3 cases flap necrosis occurred, requiring free tissue transfer.

Treatment of osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint by resection-suspension-interposition arthoplasty using the split abductor pollicis longus tendon.

OBJECTIVE: Reduction of pain and gain of functionality in symptomatic osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint. INDICATIONS: Idiopathic, rheumatic, or posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint. RELATIVE CONTRAINDICATIONS: Poor general condition, poor condition of the hand's soft tissue/skin, chronic regional pain syndrome, current or recent infections of the hand, heavy manual labor (decision on a by-case basis). SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Supine position, hand pronated or slightly tilted. Upper arm tourniquet (Esmarch's method). Loupe magnification. Incision over the first extensor compartment. Exposure and incision of the thumb's basal joint. Resection of the trapezium. Exposure of the abductor pollicis longus (APL) tendon. Longitudinal split of the tendon harvesting the distally based ulnar part of the tendon. The split APL tendon is wrapped around the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscle tendon, suturing it to the tendon and back to itself. The rest of the split APL tendon is placed into the gap between the scaphoid and the first metacarpal bone, which is followed by wound closure. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Plaster cast (thumb abduction splint) for 4 weeks. Stable commercially available wrist brace for at least 2 more weeks. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the FCR arthroplasty (Epping's method) and the APL arthroplasty (Wulle's technique) regarding pain (visual analog scale), disability/usability (DASH score), or range of motion. Patients who had undergone APL arthroplasty showed significantly better grip and pinch strength. Furthermore, the operating time was significantly shorter and scars were significantly smaller in APL arthroplasty.

[Proximal tibial replacement and alloplastic reconstruction of the extensor mechanism after bone tumor resection]. / Proximaler Tibiaersatz und alloplastische Rekonstruktion des Streckapparats nach Resektion kniegelenksnaher Tumoren.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of the operation is limb-sparing resection of tumors arising from the proximal tibia with adequate surgical margins and local tumor control. Implantation of a constrained tumor prosthesis with an alloplastic reconstruction of the extensor mechanism to restore painless joint function and loading capacity of the extremity. INDICATIONS: Primary bone and soft tissue sarcomas. Benign or semimalignant aggressive lesions. Metastatic disease (radiation resistance and/or good prognosis). CONTRAINDICATIONS: Poor physical status. Extensive metastatic disease with life expectancy <6 months. Tumor penetration through the skin. Local infection or recalcitrant osteomyelitis. Poor therapeutic compliance. Large popliteal extraosseous tumor masses with infiltration of neurovascular structures. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: A single incision is made from the anteromedial aspect of the distal femur to the distal one third of the medial lower leg. Preparation of large medial and lateral fasciocutaneous flaps. The popliteal vessels are explored through a medial approach by releasing the pes anserinus and semimembranosus tendon, mobilizing the medial gastrocnemius muscle and detaching the soleus muscle from the tibial margo medialis. The anterior tibial artery and vein are ligated. If the knee joint is free of tumor, circumferential dissection of the knee capsule is performed and the patellar ligament is dissected. An osteotomy of the tibia shaft is performed with safety margins according to preoperative planning. In order to obtain adequate surgical margins, in some cases an en bloc resection of the tibiofibular joint becomes necessary. Therefore, the peroneal nerve is exposed. Parts of the M. tibialis anterior, a portion of the M. soleus and the entire M. popliteus are left on the resected tibial bone. After implantation of the prosthesis and coupling of the femoral and tibial component, the extensor mechanism is reconstructed using an alloplastic cord. It is passed transversely through the distal end of the quadriceps tendon looping the proximal margin of the patella. Both ends are passed distally through a subsynovial tunnel and are fixed under adequate pretension in a metal block of the tibial component. The detached hamstrings and remaining ligaments can be fixed on preformed eyes of the prosthesis. A medial gastrocnemius muscle flap is used to provide soft tissue coverage of the tibial component. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Immobilization and elevation of the extremity for 5 days, then flap conditioning. Mobilization in a hinged knee brace locked in extension for 6 weeks without weight bearing. During this time active flexion with a stepwise progress, isometric quadriceps training. Then beginning of straight leg raising exercises, stepwise unlocking of the brace with 30° every 2 weeks. Weight-bearing is increased by 10 kg/week. Thrombosis prophylaxis until full weight-bearing. At follow-up, patients are monitored for local recurrence and metastases using history, physical examination and radiographic studies. RESULTS: Between 1988 and 2009, endoprosthetic replacement and alloplastic reconstruction of the extensor mechanism after resection of tibial bone tumors was performed in 17 consecutive patients (9 females and 8 males) with a mean age of 31.1 years (range 11-65 years). There were no local recurrences. Until now, 5 patients have died of tumor disease. One or more operative revisions were necessary in 53.9% of the patients. According to Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the implant survival at 5 years was 53.6% and 35.7% at 10 years, respectively. In 2 cases, a distal transfemoral amputation had to be performed due to deep infection. There were 3 cases of tibial stem revision due to implant failure and aseptic loosening, respectively. In 3 patients, the hinge of the prosthesis had to be revised. Impaired wound healing occurred in 2 cases. Peroneal nerve palsy was observed in 3 patients with recovery in only one. The mean Oxford knee score for 9 of the 12 living patients was 30.7 ± 7.5 (24-36). No patient had a clinically relevant extension lag. The mean range of motion at the last follow-up was 90.2° ± 26.7 (range 35-130°). All patients were well satisfied with their postoperative outcomes.

Reconstruction of the thumb tip using palmar neurovascular flaps.

OBJECTIVE: Reconstruction of the tip of the thumb using a neurovascular flap. INDICATIONS: Transverse defects of the thumb's tip or large defects of the palmar pulp (max. 2.0-2.5 cm) with exposure of bone and/or tendons. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Extensive crush injury, heavy wound contamination, circulatory disorders, acute infection, very large defects (> 2.0-2.5 cm finger length), circumferential soft tissue defects, and previous defects/operations (relative). SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Supine position, hand supinated, tourniquet, loupe magnification. Mid-lateral incisions along both sides of the finger running from the defect to the interphalangeal joint (small defect) or proceeding further proximally. Careful elevation of the flap including both neurovascular bundles leaving dorsal branches of the bundles (long fingers only) and the flexor tendon sheath intact. Suture of the flap in either flexion position (i.e., advancement flap) (Moberg) or by creating an island-flap through an additional transverse skin incision along the flap's base (O'Brien). Finally, closure of the defect at the flap's base using a full thickness skin graft, Z plasty, or V-Y plasty. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Plaster cast (finger slightly flexed) for 2 weeks. RESULTS: Reliable method. Good functional results with good sensibility and only minor reduction in range of motion.

[Soft tissue reconstruction of the distal lower extremity using the 180-degree perforator-based propeller flap]. / Die 180º-Propellerlappenplastik zur Defektdeckung im Bereich des distalen Unterschenkels.

OBJECTIVE: Operative technique of propeller flap reconstruction of soft tissue defects in the distal lower extremity. Soft tissue reconstruction of the distal third of the lower extremity with local, reliable perforator flaps avoiding free tissue transfer. INDICATIONS: Complex wounds (maximum width of 6 cm) of the distal lower extremity with exposed bones, joints, tendons, and neurovascular structures. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Arterial vascular disease (stage III or IV), diabetes mellitus, postthrombotic syndrome, venous ulcers, chronic lymphedema, contusion of adjacent soft tissue, previous radiation, and lack of perforators SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: The perforator represents the pivot point around which rotation of up to 180º of the subfascially harvested flap allows closure of the defect. The proximal donor site can be closed primarily up to a width of 6 cm. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Strict elevation of the extremity for 5 days, then flap conditioning. RESULTS: This technique was used for soft tissue reconstruction in 17 patients. In one patient with diabetes, complete flap necrosis occurred, requiring amputation of the extremity. One case of epidermolysis healed without further surgery.

[Propeller flaps: the reliability of preoperative, unidirectional Doppler sonography]. / Propeller-Lappenplastiken: die Reliabilität der präoperativen, unidirektionalen Dopplersonografie.

BACKGROUND: Propeller flaps represent an elegant and reliable method for soft-tissue reconstruction of the extremities and trunk, obviating the need for free tissue transfer. Preoperative localisation of perforators adjacent to the defect is important regarding the pivot point and length of the flap. Most commonly unidirectional Doppler sonography is used. The reliability of this method regarding propellerflaps has not thoroughly been evaluated. The aim of this study is to assess the positive predictive value of this method for planning propeller flaps. PATIENTS AND METHOD: In a total of 68 patients, soft-tissue reconstruction using propeller flaps was planned with unidirectional Doppler sonography. Defects were located on the lower extremity in 48 cases, the buttock area in 15 cases and the trunk in 5 cases. RESULTS: In 12 cases no adequate perforators were located intraoperatively despite a positive Doppler signal. In the lower extremity Doppler produced a false-positive result in 21% of the cases, whereas in the buttock region only 13% false positives result were found. The positive predictive value overall was 82%. When no perforator was located, flap coverage was achieved using the reverse sural artery flap in 6 cases, the free peroneal artery perforator flap in 3 cases, local advancement flaps in 2 cases and skin grafting in 1 case. DISCUSSION: The reliability of unidirectional Doppler sonography is inadequate for localisation and selection of the dominant perforator when planning propeller flaps. A high rate of false-positive results needs to be anticipated especially distally in the extremities. In 18% of cases an alternative surgical plan was required to achieve soft tissue coverage. We recommend using colour duplex sonography for a more reliable preoperative localisation of perforators.

[Aging and the appearance of the hand]. / Alterung und ideale Asthetik der Hand.

The appearance of the hand is clearly secondary to its function. Nonetheless, aging changes on the hands are of considerable importance to many patients. Although rejuvenation of the hand has attracted increased interest in plastic surgery recently, the dermatologists have dealt with this problem for a longer time. Successful rejuvenation requires thorough analysis of the underlying pathophysiology. Hand aging is characterized by dermal and subcutaneous volume loss resulting wrinkle formation. Aging is also associated with increased visibility of tendons and veins as well as age spots and precancerous lesions. Hand rejuvenation aims at successfully reversing this three-dimensional process. The majority of treatment options address only partial aspects of the aging process. Topical treatments are the mainstay of therapy as these changes are most obvious. As patients will mainly seek advice from dermatologist, this field requires increased attention.

A randomised clinical study comparing palmar and dorsal fixed-angle plates for the internal fixation of AO C-type fractures of the distal radius in the elderly.

Current surgical treatments for distal radial fractures include dorsal and palmar plate fixation. We report results of a randomised study comparing these methods for AO C1-3 fractures. The emphasis was placed on the early postoperative functional recovery within the first 6 months as this interval is of decisive importance for elderly patients. Thirty patients with unilateral AO C1-3 fractures were enroled, 15 were treated with a palmar plate and 15 received a dorsal Pi-plate. Results were assessed 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postoperatively focusing on functional recovery. The palmar plate group demonstrated significantly better results in range of motion, grip strength and pain.

[Soft tissue coverage of the distal third of the tibia with fasciocutaneous propeller flaps]. / Die Defektdeckung des distalen Unterschenkeldrittels mit perforatorbasierten 180 degrees -Propellerlappen.

BACKGROUND: The distal third of the tibia is often only amenable to free tissue transfer to cover exposed bone, tendons and neurovascular structures. Using relatively constant perforators of the tibial and peroneal vessels, soft tissue coverage can be achieved with so-called propeller flaps. METHODS: 8 patients presenting with post-traumatic defects over the lateral malleolus and the Achilles tendon were included in this study. A propeller flap based on perforators from the peroneal or tibial artery was used to cover the defect. RESULTS: One case of partial flap necrosis was encountered in a diabetic patient. Transient venous congestion of the flap tip was witnessed in two instances, which resolved without further intervention. No other complications occurred. All patients were fully ambulatory within 8 weeks, except for 1 patient, who required a below-knee amputation. CONCLUSION: The propeller flap has proven to be a versatile and elegant method to obtain soft tissue coverage with local tissue. Contrary to conventional rotation flaps, direct closure of the donor site is possible. Patients are not impaired by bulky flaps and may wear normal shoes. Even in the elderly, this flap was successful.

[Body dysmorphic disorder--dysmorphophobia]. / Body Dysmorphic Disorder--Dysmorphophobie.

Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) is a rare disease. Although described in the last century it was only recently classified in the DSM-IV. BDD is characterized by an excessive concern about an imagined deformity of the body. Establishing the diagnosis of BDD remains to be demanding, yet of utmost importance for the surgeon. Only a timely diagnosis will prevent dissatisfaction of both the patient and the surgeon. In this article, strategies to cope with such patients after diagnosis are described.

Complications after Pi Plate osteosynthesis.

BACKGROUND: Distal intraarticular radius fractures can be operated on by means of a palmar or dorsal approach. The dorsal approach has been reported as a treatment option that often leads to tendon ruptures. The purpose of this study was to show that a dorsal implant does not lead to a high rate of tendon ruptures. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in which the patient population was analyzed for complaints and complications, follow-up time, and further surgical procedures. RESULTS: A series of 389 patients with distal intraarticular fractures of the radius treated with the dorsal Pi Plate is reported. There was a complication rate of 6.7 percent within the first 2 postoperative months. A special focus was on the occurrence of extensor tendon ruptures, which occurred in five cases in the patient population. This most feared complication occurred within the first 8 months after surgery and in no case at a later stage. All tendon ruptures were reconstructed and healed without further complications. Hardware was removed in 75.5 percent of patients after 6 to 8 months. In the remaining 24.5 percent of patients, the plates were left in situ for more than 33 months, and 89 percent of these patients were free of pain and had excellent movement in the wrist. CONCLUSIONS: The authors conclude that the Pi Plate is a very good surgical option, especially in complicated, comminuted fractures classified as C3. It is not associated with an overly high risk of extensor tendon ruptures, as has been suggested by other authors.