A machine leaning approach for abdominal aortic aneurysm severity assessment using geometric, biomechanical, and patient-specific historical clinical features.

Recent studies monitoring severity of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) suggested that reliance on only the maximum transverse diameter ( D max ) may be insufficient to predict AAA rupture risk. Moreover, geometric indices, biomechanical parameters, material properties, and patient-specific historical data affect AAA morphology, indicating the need for an integrative approach that incorporates all factors for more accurate estimation of AAA severity. We implemented a machine learning algorithm using 45 features extracted from 66 patients. The model was generated using the J48 decision tree algorithm with the aim of maximizing model accuracy. Three different feature sets were used to assess the prediction rate: i) using D max as a single-feature set, ii) using a set of all features, and, lastly iii) using a feature set selected via the BestFirst feature selection algorithm. Our results indicate that BestFirst feature selection yielded the highest prediction accuracy. These results indicate that a combination of several specific parameters that comprehensively capture AAA behavior may enable a suitable assessment of AAA severity, suggesting the potential benefit of machine learning for this application.

(PEAK) WALL STRESS AS AN INDICATOR OF ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM SEVERITY.

Abdominal aortic aneurysms, which consist of dilatations of the infra-renal aorta by at least 1.5 times of its normal diameter, are becoming a leading cause of death worldwide. Rupture often occurs unexpectedly, before a repair procedure is conducted. The AAA maximum diameter has been used as a clinical criterion to monitor AAA severity. However, assessment of AAA rupture risk requires knowledge of wall stress and wall strength at the potential rupture location. We conducted a study on 37 patient specific CT datasets to investigate the benefits of using peak wall stress instead of Dmax for AAA rupture severity. Correlation between PWS and 24 geometric indices and biomechanical factors was studied where eleven of them showed a statistically significant correlation with PWS. A Finite Element Analysis Rupture Index was used to conclude that the use of D max as a single predictor of AAA behavior and severity may be insufficient based on our patient population with a Dmax smaller than the 5.5 cm, clinically recommended repair threshold.

Toward modeling the effects of regional material properties on the wall stress distribution of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

The overall geometry and different biomechanical parameters of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), contribute to its severity and risk of rupture, therefore they could be used to track its progression. Previous and ongoing research efforts have resorted to using uniform material properties to model the behavior of AAA. However, it has been recently illustrated that different regions of the AAA wall exhibit different behavior due to the effect of the biological activities in the metalloproteinase matrix that makes up the wall at the aneurysm site. In this work, we introduce a non-invasive patient-specific regional material property model to help us better understand and investigate the AAA wall stress distribution, peak wall stress (PWS) severity, and potential rupture risk. Our results indicate that the PWS and the overall wall stress distribution predicted using the proposed regional material property model, are higher than those predicted using the traditional homogeneous, hyper-elastic model (p <1.43E-07). Our results also show that to investigate AAA, the overall geometry, presence of intra-luminal thrombus (ILT), and loading condition in a patient specific manner may be critical for capturing the biomechanical complexity of AAAs.