Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 15(3): 1459-63, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24606483

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Urological cancers represent a major public problem associated with high mortality and morbidity. The pattern of these cancers varies markedly according to era, region and ethnic groups, but increasing incidence trends overall makes focused epidemiological studies important. The aim of the present study was to assess the incidence of most prevalent urological cancers in Iran from 2003 to 2009. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data for this study were obtained from the population-based Cancer Registry Center of the Iran Ministry of Health and Medical Education. Differences of mean age and age distributions of each cancer were compared between 2003 and 2009 in men and women. RESULTS: Bladder cancer was the most common urologic cancer in both genders. The rate difference of age standardized ratio (ASR) of bladder and renal cell carcinoma in women were 1.54 and 2.01 percent per 100,000 population from 2003 to the 2009, respectively. In men, the rate difference of age standardized ratio of prostate, testis, kidney and bladder cancer was also 2.23, 1.2, 1.8 and 1.5 percent per 100,000 population from 2003 to 2009, respectively. The mean ages of patients in all cancers in both genders did not differ significantly through time (p value>0.05) but the distribution of ages of patients with bladder and prostate cancer changed significantly from 2003 to 2009 (p value<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of present study suggest the general pattern and incidence of urological cancers in Iran are changing, the observed increase pointing to a need for urological cancer screening programs.


Subject(s)
Kidney Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Testicular Neoplasms/epidemiology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Female , Humans , Iran/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged
2.
Indian J Gastroenterol ; 32(1): 49-53, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23238689

ABSTRACT

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) has evolved as the surgical procedure of choice for ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of our study was to evaluate the quality of life (QOL) of UC patients who underwent this procedure over 5 years ago. Thirty-nine UC patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA were interviewed by the validated inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (IBDQ). Each patient was assigned a score, ranging from 32 to 224, in which the highest score indicates the best QOL. QOL for postoperative patients was good in 15 (38.5 %), regular in 23 (59 %), and bad in 1 (2.6 %) patient. QOL was not significantly influenced by age or gender of the patient. The emotional aspect received the highest score in the IBDQ and for each question that was analyzed separately; most of the patients were pleased and thankful with their lives and this question received the highest score. Long-term QOL was good in UC patients who underwent IPAA. This operation should be considered as the first choice since the patients were stable after long-term follow up.


Subject(s)
Anal Canal/surgery , Colitis, Ulcerative/surgery , Colonic Pouches , Proctocolectomy, Restorative/methods , Quality of Life , Adolescent , Adult , Anastomosis, Surgical , Colitis, Ulcerative/psychology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Proctocolectomy, Restorative/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...