Comparison of patients with severe COVID-19 admitted to an intensive care unit in South Africa during the first and second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: The second wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), dominated by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Beta variant, has been reported to be associated with increased severity in South Africa (SA). Objectives: To describe and compare clinical characteristics, management and outcomes of COVID-19 patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) in SA during the first and second waves. Methods: In a prospective, single-centre, descriptive study, we compared all patients with severe COVID-19 admitted to ICU during the first and second waves. The primary outcomes assessed were ICU mortality and ICU length of stay (LOS). Results: In 490 patients with comparable ages and comorbidities, no difference in mortality was demonstrated during the second compared with the first wave (65.9% v. 62.5%, p=0.57). ICU LOS was longer in the second wave (10 v. 6 days, p<0.001). More female admissions (67.1% v. 44.6%, p<0.001) and a greater proportion of patients were managed with invasive mechanical ventilation than with non-invasive respiratory support (39.0% v. 14%, p<0.001) in the second wave. Conclusion: While clinical characteristics were comparable between the two waves, a higher proportion of patients was invasively ventilated and ICU stay was longer in the second. ICU mortality was unchanged.

Evaluating the time interval from diagnosis to fibrinolysis at centres in the drainage area of Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.

BACKGROUND: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is one of the main contributors to morbidity and mortality in South Africa (SA). Timeous intervention by means of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or fibrinolysis can significantly improve the outcome of STEMI. OBJECTIVES: To determine the median time interval between diagnosis and fibrinolysis in patients presenting to centres within the drainage area of Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, SA, and compare it with the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommendation of 10 minutes. METHODS: A retrospective medical record review of patients presenting to the abovementioned centres between 1 March 2017 and 28 February 2018 was performed. The primary presenting centre, time between diagnosis and fibrinolysis and discharge medication were recorded, in addition to other relevant demographic information. RESULTS: A total of 492 patients were identified, of whom 447 were included in the study. Three hundred and eighteen patients received fibrinolysis, of whom 18 (5.7%) were treated within 10 minutes of diagnosis. The median time interval between diagnosis and fibrinolysis was 67 (interquartile range (IQR) 32.5 -122.5) minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients received fibrinolysis >10 minutes after diagnosis, which indicates suboptimal therapy when compared with the ESC guidelines. Future studies should investigate the factors prolonging this therapeutic delay.