Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cureus ; 14(4): e23966, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35541300

ABSTRACT

Introduction Peritonitis secondary to gastrointestinal perforation causes high morbidity and mortality rates in the emergency department with an immediate need for surgical intervention. Despite improved surgical management procedures, patients are still suffering from gastrointestinal leak causing peritonitis that demands surgical management by highly skilled surgeons in high-quality surgical units. Material and methods This paper presents one year of experience in the surgical treatment of gastrointestinal perforation-related peritonitis by surgeons in Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan. Data was retrospectively collected from patient records and quantitatively analyzed. Involved patients developed peritonitis secondary to gastrointestinal perforation requiring surgical exploration and interventions in the emergency department between November 2020 and October 2021. Results One hundred and fifty-eight patients were involved; the mean age was 43.46 years. The number of males was 87 (55.06%). The patients mostly presented with generalized abdominal pain (57.6%). All the patients had perforation-related peritonitis, which was most prevalent in the ileum (62%). The most performed surgical intervention was loop ileostomy (36.71%). Compared to other published reports, the incidence rate of wound dehiscence in the hospital was relatively higher. Postoperatively, wound infection was low if the skin was left open (23.62%) compared to closed skin (38.7%). Patient outcomes were acceptable as the death rate was low (3.2%, 5/158). Conclusion Peritonitis caused by gastrointestinal perforation is associated with a high risk of morbidity that necessitates surgical exploration. Leaving skin wound open after the surgical intervention is recommended to decrease the incidence of wound infection and dehiscence.

2.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 72(12): 2413-2416, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37246659

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To review the impact of age on perioperative and postoperative outcomes in patients following pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS: The retrospective study was conducted at the Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan, and comprised data from January 2014 to December 2018 of all patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy. Postoperative morbidity and oncological outcomes were compared between patients aged ≤60 years in group A and those aged >60 years in group B. Data was analysed using SPSS 20. RESULTS: Of the 161 patients, 103(64%) were males and 58(36%) were females. There were 117(73%) patients in group A; 72(61.5%) males and 45(38.5%) females with an overall mean age of 46±11 years. The remaining 44(27%) were in group B; 31(70.5%) males and 13(29.5%) females with an overall mean age of 67±05 years. The most common pathology was adenocarcinoma 130(81%), commonest site was periampullary 85(53%) and the most common pancreatic reconstruction technique employed was pancreaticogastrostomy 110(68%). Patients in group B had significantly higher comorbidities compared to those in group A (p<0.05). Estimated blood loss during surgery was significantly higher in group B (p=0.004). There was no significant difference in overall morbidity (p=0.856), reoperation (p=1.000), 30-day readmission rate (p=0.097), 90-day mortality rate (p=0.324)) and overall survival (p=0.551) between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatoduodenectomy could be performed in the elderly with comparable morbidity and oncological outcomes as younger patients. Comorbid conditions remained higher in elderly patients and preoperative optimisation may help improve postoperative outcomes.


Subject(s)
Pancreatic Neoplasms , Pancreaticoduodenectomy , Male , Aged , Female , Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Anastomosis, Surgical
3.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 71(12): 2748-2754, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35150532

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyse outcomes of breast conservation surgery and to identify the factors that could have affected the outcomes. METHODS: The retrospective study was conducted at the Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan, and comprised data of breast conservation surgery cases done between January 2011 and October 2014 in order to cover up for the 5-year follow-up of the last enrolled patient. Data, obtained through the institutional information and database system, included disease-recurrence, 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival. Data was statistically analysed using SPSS 20. RESULTS: Of the 553 cases, 417(75%) had no loco-regional recurrence or distant metastasis, while 136(25%) had some form of loco-regional, distant or contralateral metastasis at 5-year follow-up. In patients who had recurrence or metastasis, only progesterone receptor status, nodal status and mode of treatment showed significant association (p<0.05). Mortality at 5-year follow-up was 77(14%). Amongst the patients who died, only progesterone receptor status and nodal status had significant association (p<0.05). Five-year overall survival for the cohort was 476(86%), whereas 5-year disease-free survival was 409(74%). CONCLUSION: Breast conservation surgery was found to have favourable outcomes, while progesterone status, nodal involvement and mode of treatment significantly affected the outcome.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Mastectomy , Mastectomy, Segmental , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective Studies
4.
Pancreatology ; 20(7): 1534-1539, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32928685

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) plays an integral part in the management of pancreatic, periampullary and duodenal cancers, along with a few other pathologies of this region. Despite advances in surgery PD continues to have significant morbidity and noteworthy mortality. The aim of this study is to provide an in-depth report on the patient characteristics, indications and the outcomes of PD) in a tertiary cancer hospital in Pakistan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population included patients who underwent PD between January 1, 2014 and march 31, 2019, at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center (SKMCH&RC) in Pakistan. The data was retrospectively analyzed from the Hospital Information System (HIS), which is a prospectively maintained patient electronic database of SKMCH&RC. Patient characteristics, procedural details and post-operative outcomes according to internationally accepted definitions were reported. RESULTS: A total of 161 patients underwent PD at our hospital in the study period at a median age of 53 years, ranging from 19 to 78 years. 62% of the patients were males while 37% were females. Jaundice was the most common presenting symptom (64.6%), followed by abdominal pain (26.7%). PD with pancreaticogastrostomy was performed in 110 patients (68.3%), while pancreaticojejunostomy was performed in the rest of the cohort. Surgical site infection (SSI) was observed in 64 patients (40%). The incidence of Pancreatic Fistula grade C based on the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) definition was 7.45% (n = 12). The 30 days mortality rate was 3.1%. Median survival of the cohort was 21 ±1.13 months and disease-free survival was 16±2.62 months. CONCLUSION: PD can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality in a resource constrained country, as long as it is undertaken in a high-volume center. This is in keeping with data published from other well-reputed international centers.


Subject(s)
Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Databases, Factual , Developing Countries , Disease-Free Survival , Duodenal Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Gastrostomy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pakistan , Pancreatectomy/adverse effects , Pancreatic Fistula/epidemiology , Pancreatic Fistula/etiology , Pancreaticojejunostomy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
5.
Cureus ; 12(5): e7932, 2020 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32494538

ABSTRACT

Objective  The objective of the study is to investigate the benefits of pathological assessment of donuts removed during coloanal anastomosis after anterior resection. Methodology During three years, 220 patients underwent circular stapled anastomosis. It is a retrospective study with convenient sampling. Involvement of donuts, the involvement of margins, length of donuts, and margins were primarily recorded. Ethical review approval was taken from the Institutional Review Board. Hospital electronic system was used to retrieve the data. Results Two hundred and twenty patients underwent circular end to end anastomosis (CEEA) stapled gun anastomosis. All had adenocarcinoma. Most of the patients had T3 disease (n=113). Low anterior resection was the most common procedure followed by anterior resection and sigmoid colectomy, respectively. We performed all rectal cancers anastomosis with a circular stapling gun. On histological analyses among 220 patients, only two patients were found to have a positive distal donut. No proximal donuts were positive. Both patients were also found to have positive distal margins. The mean length of the proximal donut was 1.79±0.45 cm. The mean length of the distal donut was 1.68±0.48 cm. Two distal margins and none of the proximal margins were positive for cancer. The mean length of the proximal margin was 8.69±4.48 cm. The mean length of the distal margin was 4.9±5.98 cm. Both patients had already received six months of pre-operative chemoradiotherapy and were not offered any additional treatment. Both patients were kept on close surveillance. Conclusion Routine analyses of the donuts after anterior resection has no impact on the management and outcome of the disease.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...