Clinical Trials in Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery: Assessing Trial Characteristics, Early Discontinuation, Result Reporting, and Publication.

BACKGROUND: Hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) diseases carry high morbidity despite efforts aimed at their reduction. An assessment of their trial characteristics is paramount to determine trial design adequacy and highlight areas for improvement. As such, the aim of this study is to assess HPB surgery trial characteristics, summarize logistic, financial, and practical reasons behind early discontinuation, and propose potential interventions to prevent this in the future. METHODS: All clinical trials investigating HPB surgery registered on ClinicalTrials.gov from October 1st, 2007 (inclusive), to April 20th, 2021 (inclusive), were examined. Trial characteristics were collected including, but not limited to, study phase, duration, patient enrollment size, location, and study design. Peer-reviewed publications associated with the selected trials were also assessed to determine outcome reporting. RESULTS: A total of 1776 clinical trials conducted in 43 countries were identified, the majority of which were conducted in the USA. Of these trials, 32% were reported as "completed" whereas 12% were "discontinued." The most common cause of trial discontinuation was low accrual, which was reported in 37% of terminated studies. These resulted in 413 published studies. Most trials had multiple assignment, randomized, or open-label designs. Treatment was the most common study objective (73%) with pharmacological therapy being the most commonly studied intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The main reasons for early discontinuation of clinical trials in HPB surgery are poor patient recruitment and inadequate funding. Improved trial design, recruitment strategies and increased funding are needed to prevent trial discontinuation and increase publication rates of HPB surgery clinical trials.

Distribution of international medical graduates across USA surgical training programs: a descriptive cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: International medical graduates (IMGs) have been a critical part of the USA healthcare in the past 30 years, especially in small rural and poor counties. However, little to no publications are present on the distribution of these IMGs across general surgery residency programs. METHODS: All freely accessible information on current residents in accredited general surgery residency programs within the USA with at least a 5-year history was explored for IMGs in the current roster using the AMA residency and fellowship database in 2020. Demographic and geographic data were summarized. RESULTS: A total of 230 general surgery residency program were included. Programs were distributed among 46 (92%) states. Of a total 6304 categorical general surgery residents, 573 (9%) were IMGs. Florida (USA) had the highest total number of current IMG general surgery residents with 64. The highest percentage of current IMG residents was found in Maryland (USA) with 31%. IMGs obtained their medical degrees from 76 different countries worldwide. Grenada was the country with the highest origin of IMGs with 77 residents. Central/North America had the highest origin of IMGs with 217 (38%). CONCLUSIONS: IMGs make up a small portion of current general surgery residents in USA programs. Some states host more IMGs than others. Particular countries have contributed more IMGs than others. More research is needed to the challenges facing IMGs and come up with novel solutions for them.

Preoperative MELD score predicts adverse outcomes following gastrectomy: An ACS NSQIP analysis.

BACKGROUND: The Model End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) has been widely used to predict the mortality and morbidity of various surgical procedures. We aimed to assess the impact of preoperative MELD score on adverse 30-day postoperative outcomes following gastrectomy. METHODS: Patients who underwent elective, non-emergent gastrectomy were identified from the ACS NSQIP 2014-2019 database. Patients were categorized according to a calculated MELD score. The primary outcomes of this study were the 30-day overall complications and major complication rates following gastrectomy. RESULTS: Compared to MELD <11, patients with MELD ≥11 had significantly higher rates of mortality, any complication, and major complication. MELD score ≥11 was significantly associated with any complication (OR 1.73, p = 0.011) and major complications (1.85, p = 0.014) on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: MELD score ≥11 was associated with poorer outcomes in patients undergoing gastrectomy compared to lower MELD scores.

Robotic pancreas surgery: an overview of history and update on technique, outcomes, and financials.

The use robotics in surgery is gaining momentum. This approach holds substantial promise in pancreas surgery. Robotic surgery for pancreatic lesions and malignancies has become well accepted and is expanding to more and more center annually. The number of centers using robotics in pancreatic surgery is rapidly increasing. The most studied robotic pancreas surgeries are pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy. Most studies are in their early phases, but they report that robotic pancreas surgery is safe feasible. Robotic pancreas surgery offers several advantages over open and laparoscopic techniques. Data regarding costs of robotics versus conventional techniques is still lacking. Robotic pancreas surgery is still in its early stages. It holds promise to become the new surgical standard for pancreatic resections in the future, however, more research is still needed to establish its safety, cost effectiveness and efficacy in providing the best outcomes.

American college of surgeons NSQIP pancreatic surgery publications: A critical appraisal of the quality of methodological reporting.

BACKGROUND: The use of ACS-NSQIP has increased in pancreatic surgery (PS) research. The aim of this study is to critically appraise the methodological reporting of PS publications utilizing the ACS-NSQIP database. STUDY DESIGN: PubMed was queried for all PS studies employing the ACS-NSQIP database published between 2004 and 2021. Critical appraisal was performed using the JAMA-Surgery Checklist, STROBE Statement, and RECORD Statement. RESULTS: A total of 86 studies were included. Median scores for number of fulfilled criteria for the JAMA-Surgery Checklist, STROBE Statement, and RECORD Statement were 6, 20, and 6 respectively. The most commonly unfulfilled criteria were those relating to discussion of missed data, compliance with IRB, unadjusted and adjusted outcomes, providing supplementary/raw information, and performing subgroup analyses. CONCLUSION: An overall satisfactory reporting of methodology is present among PS studies utilizing the ACS-NSQIP database. Areas for improved adherence include discussing missed data, providing supplementary information, and performing subgroup analysis. Due to the increasing role of large-scale databases, enhanced adherence to reporting guidelines may advance PS research.

National trends in cholecystectomies in the US: a 15-year comparison of two surgical approaches.

BACKGROUND: The two approaches for performing cholecystectomy are open and laparoscopic ones. This study aims to characterize national trends of cholecystectomies in the United States (US) and determine differences by approach, age group, primary payer, teaching status and location of healthcare center. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing cholecystectomy was done using the US National Inpatient Sample from 1997 to 2011. Trends in open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy were analyzed, as well as comparison between age groups, primary payer, location and teaching status of hospitals operations were performed at. RESULTS: Around 6 million cholecystectomies performed from 1997 to 2011. The laparoscopic approach was significantly more common than the open (P<0.001). A significant decrease in open cholecystectomies is seen since 1997. Age group of 65-84 had significantly the most cases in the open approach (P<0.001), while in laparoscopic the 18-44 age group had the significantly highest amount (P<0.001). Medicare covered the most cases for open, while private insurance covered the most in the laparoscopic approach. Most cases were performed in urban, private non-profit, non-teaching hospitals in both groups. In the laparoscopic group the South had a significantly higher (P<0.001) number of cases compared to all other US regions. CONCLUSIONS: Cholecystectomies remained constant from 1997 to 2011. The number of open cholecystectomies decreased over time in favor of laparoscopic ones. More funding should be given to private non-teaching hospitals as they perform the majority of cholecystectomies nationwide. Better management of cholecystectomy risk factors is needed in the South.

Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancers: A Review of Definitions, Diagnostics, Strategies for Treatment, and Future Directions.

ABSTRACT: Locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancers are being increasingly recognized as a result of significant improvements in imaging modalities. The main tools used in diagnosis of these tumors include endoscopic ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and diagnostic laparoscopy. The definition of what constitutes a locally advanced or borderline resectable tumor is still controversial to this day. Borderline resectable tumors have been treated with neoadjuvant therapy approaches that aim at reducing tumor size, thus improving the chances of an R0 resection. Both chemotherapy and radiotherapy (solo or in combination) have been used in this setting. The main chemotherapy agents that have shown to increase resectability and survival are FOLFORINOX (a combination of folinic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) and gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel. Surgery on these tumors remains a significantly challenging task for pancreatic surgeons. More studies are needed to determine the best agents to be used in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, biologic markers for prognostic and operative predictions, and validation of previously published retrospective results.

Landscape of interventional clinical trials involving gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) is the third most common cause of malignancy associated mortality globally. The cornerstone of curative treatment involves surgical gastrectomy. In this study, we explore clinical trials involving gastrectomy for GC, highlighting inadequacies and underlining promising surgical interventions and strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On 1 May 2020, ClinicalTrials.gov was explored for interventional trials related to gastrectomy for GC, without adding limitations for location or date. All data pertaining to the trials were collected. Characteristics such as phase, duration, enrolment size, location, treatment allocation, masking and primary endpoint were analysed. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-eight clinical trials met the search criteria. Clinical trials were performed in only 14 countries; most of them occurring in China. Most trials (33%) were still in the recruiting phase. On average, the length of trials was 3.9 years. Most trials had parallel assignment, were randomised and masked. The primary endpoint which was mostly commonly studied was overall survival (33%). The most common intervention studied is laparoscopic gastrectomy in 43 (31%) trials. CONCLUSIONS: Our study exposed a small number of trials, publication rate, absence of geographic variety in clinical trials involving gastrectomy for GC. Adequate management of trial design can help decrease duration and increase validity of results. More trials comparing different surgical techniques are needed to update the surgical practice of gastrectomy for GC.

Treatment and Prognosis of Hepatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma: A SEER Database Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEH) is a rare tumor that can affect multiple organs. Little is known about the pathophysiology, clinical course and management of this disease. The aim of this study is to determine survival rates and elucidate the role of various prognostic factors and therapeutic modalities as compared to surgery on patients with HEH. METHODS: A retrospective analysis on patients diagnosed with HEH between 2004 and 2016 was performed utilizing the SEER database. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed to determine overall and cancer-specific survival, and the log-rank test was used to compare between groups. To explore prognostic factors and treatment outcomes, univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were developed. RESULTS: A total of 353 patients with HEH (median age: 50.4 years) were identified. The most common surgery performed was liver resection (90.8%). One-year OS in the surgical group and non-surgical group was 86.6% and 61.0%, respectively, while 5-year OS was 75.2% and 37.4%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, surgery emerged as a favorable prognostic factor [HR (95%CI): 0.404 (0.215-0.758) p value = 0.005]. Age > 65 years [HR (95%CI): 2.548 (1.442-4.506) p value = 0.001] and tumor size > 10 cm [HR (95%CI): 2.401 (1.319-4.37) p value = 0.004] were shown to be poor survival prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: HEH is a rare disease that is poorly understood. Surgical intervention is associated with improved survival rates. Multicenter prospective collaborations are needed to improve our limited knowledge about this neoplasm and determine the optimal treatment strategy.

A Quality Assessment of the Information Accessible to Patients on the Internet About the Whipple Procedure.

BACKGROUND: The Internet has become a central source of information on health-related issues. The aim of this study is to assess the quality and readability of online information present on the Whipple surgical procedure by applying recognized scoring tools. METHODS: A search using the top three online search engines (Google, Bing and Yahoo) was conducted in July 2020. Websites were classified as academic, physician, commercial or unspecified. The quality of information was assessed using the JAMA and DISCERN assessment instruments and presence of a HONcode seal. Readability was assessed using the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES). RESULTS: A total of 34 unique sources were included in our study. The average JAMA and DISCERN scores of all websites were 2.22 ± 0.48 and 47.28 ± 1.17, respectively, with a median of 1.9 (range 0-4) and 47 (range 18-71), respectively. Website classification distribution was 38% academic, 18% commercial, 9% unspecified, and 1% from physician-based websites. Physician websites had the highest JAMA score with a mean of 3 ± 0.46. Unspecified websites had the highest DISCERN score with a mean of 54.60 ± 1.09. Only 3 websites had the HONcode seal. Physician websites had a significantly higher JAMA mean score than academic websites (p-value = 0.004). Readability was difficult and is on the level of university students. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show a poor quality of online information present on the Whipple surgery. Academic and physician websites need to improve the quality of their websites on the procedure. More HONcode-certified websites are needed as they are the best source for information on this operation.

Timing of cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis impacts surgical morbidity and mortality: an NSQIP database analysis.

The aim of this study is to identify the optimal timing for cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Patients undergoing cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis from the National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database between 2014 and 2016 were included. The patients were divided into 4 groups, those who underwent surgery at days 0, 1, 2, or 3+ days. The primary outcome was short-term surgical morbidity and mortality. A total of 21,392 patients were included. After adjusting for confounders, compared to day 0 patients, those who underwent surgery at day 1 and day 2 had lower composite morbidity rate, while day 3+ patients had significantly higher bleeding and mortality rate. Subgroup analysis shows this trend to be more significant in the elderly and in diabetic patients who were delayed. Delay in cholecystectomy for over 72 h from admission is associated with statistically significant increase in bleeding and mortality.

Short-term surgical morbidity and mortality of distal pancreatectomy performed for benign versus malignant diseases: a NSQIP analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Distal pancreatectomy (DP) accounts for 25% of all pancreatic resections. Complications following DP occur in around 40% of the cases. Our aim is to analyze short-term surgical outcomes of DP based on whether the indication for resection was benign or malignant pathology, as well as the effect of the surgical approach, open versus laparoscopic on morbidity and mortality. METHODS: We studied all patients undergoing DP from the National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) targeted pancreatectomy participant use file from 2014 to 2016. The patients were divided into 2 groups, those who underwent DP for benign diseases (DP-B) and those who underwent DP for malignant diseases (DP-M). We performed multivariate logistic regression to evaluate the association between benign or malignant distal pancreatectomies and 30-day outcomes. We included clinically and/or statistically significant confounders into the models. We also conducted the same analysis in the subgroups of open and laparoscopic DP. RESULTS: Three thousand five hundred and seventy-nine patients underwent distal pancreatectomy. The most common indication for surgery was malignant disease in 1894 (53%). Thirty-day mortality occurred in 0.4% of DP-B compared to 1.3% DP-M. On multivariate analysis, no significant difference was found in mortality or in the risk of pancreatic fistula between the 2 groups. Bleeding (p = 0.002) and composite morbidity (p = 0.01) were significantly higher in the DP-M group. Among composite morbidities, thromboembolism was significantly associated with DP-M (OR 2.1, p = 0.0004) only when performed with an open approach. CONCLUSION: DP-M is associated with a significantly higher risk of post-operative bleeding, thromboembolism, and sepsis compared to DP-B but no significant increase in mortality. When further analyzing the impact of the operative approach on morbidity, there was an increased rate of post-operative thromboembolic in the DP-M group when the surgery was performed in an open manner and this increased risk was no longer statistically significant if the DP-M was performed using a minimally invasive approach.

Outcomes of Laparoscopic vs Open Common Bile Duct Exploration: Analysis of the NSQIP Database.

BACKGROUND: Common bile duct exploration (CBDE) is an available option in the management of choledocholithiasis. We aimed to analyze outcomes comparing laparoscopic and open approaches to CBDE using the American College of Surgeons (ACS) NSQIP database. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing CBDE between 2008 and 2013, using the ACS NSQIP database. The cohort was split into 2 groups and compared based on operative approach: laparoscopic vs open CBDE. RESULTS: There were 2,635 patients who underwent CBDE during the study period, and 52% underwent an open approach. After adjusting for all confounding variables, open CBDE was associated with a statistically significant increase in mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.95; 95% CI 1.18 to 7.41; p = 0.02), composite morbidity (AOR 2.19; 95% CI 1.56 to 3.07; p < 0.0001), bleeding (AOR 1.86; 95% CI 1.11 to 3.12; p = 0.02), return to the operation room (AOR 1.90; 95% CI 1.16 to 3.12; p = 0.01), and readmission related to the first operation (AOR 1.55; 95% CI 1.00 to 2.39; p = 0.05). On the other hand, retained common bile duct stones were 2.8 times more likely to occur in the laparoscopic group. The mean operative time was longer by 73 minutes for patients who underwent open CBDE. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing open CBDE suffer from a statistically significantly higher rate of mortality and overall complications compared with patients undergoing the laparoscopic approach. Laparoscopic CBDE should be considered as the preferred procedure whenever possible.

Impact of intraoperative cholangiography on postoperative morbidity and readmission: analysis of the NSQIP database.

BACKGROUND: The debate regarding the merits of routine use of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) continues to rage. We aim to analyze the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database to identify patterns of utilization of cholangiography during LC as well as its impact on patient outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing LC with or without IOC in the 2012 and 2013 ACS NSQIP database. Only patients without any preoperative biochemical evidence of the CBD stone were included in the analysis. Comparison between two groups and data analysis focused on the following primary outcomes: 30-day mortality, readmission, return to operating room and NSQIP collected morbidity. RESULTS: Twenty-one percentage of patients undergoing LC without any biochemical abnormality are undergoing IOC. There were no statistically significant differences in thirty-day outcomes between two patient populations with regard to mortality, morbidity, cardiac, central nervous system, wound, deep vein thrombosis, sepsis, respiratory and urinary tract complications. Patients undergoing LC plus IOC were found to have statistically significant reduction in the rate of readmission related to the first operation (adjusted odds ratio 0.80, 95 % CI 0.70-0.92; P value = 0.002). Readmissions related to biliary complications including retained CBD following cholecystectomy were 1.61 times more likely in patients who underwent LC without cholangiography. CONCLUSION: The use of IOC at the time of LC appears to be associated with a statistically significant decrease in re-admission rates, especially readmissions related to biliary complications.

Preoperative Pneumonia and Postoperative Venous Thrombosis: A Cohort Study of 427,656 Patients Undergoing Major General Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The literature is sparse regarding the association between pneumonia and venous thrombosis in surgical patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk of postoperative venous thrombosis in patients who fit the criteria for preoperative pneumonia using data from the ongoing American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database while adjusting for potential confounders. METHODS: This is a cohort study using data from the ACS NSQIP database participating sites from 2008 (211 sites) and 2009 (237 sites). 427,656 patients undergoing major general surgery were included. The 30-day risk of postoperative venous thrombosis including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) was evaluated in patients with preoperative pneumonia diagnosed before undergoing major general surgery. RESULTS: Patients with preoperative pneumonia had a higher incidence of both 30-day DVT and PE than patients without preoperative pneumonia. After adjusting for all potential confounders, the effect estimates for the association between preoperative pneumonia and venous thrombosis were DVT, OR: 1.67 (95% CI 1.32-2.11) and PE, OR: 2.18 (95% CI 1.48-3.22). CONCLUSIONS: A large, multicenter database of surgical patients showed that preoperative pneumonia may increase risk for developing venous thrombosis. This adds to our understanding of risk factors for venous thrombosis and suggests a potential benefit of diagnosing preoperative pneumonia in patients undergoing major general surgery.

Impact of Resident Involvement in Surgery (IRIS-NSQIP): Looking at the Bigger Picture Based on the American College of Surgeons-NSQIP Database.

BACKGROUND: Surgical residency training aims to prepare the surgical resident to become an independent practitioner of surgery. Because surgical residency training remains the sole educational channel to prepare surgeons for independent practice, our study aimed to explore the effect of resident involvement in surgery across a broad spectrum of surgical specialties to answer questions patients, surgeons, and surgical residency program directors may have concerning the effect of having residents participate in performing surgical operations. STUDY DESIGN: This analysis used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database to establish whether patients having operations involving residents were at a risk of postoperative mortality or morbidity similar to patients having operations performed by attending surgeons alone, across a wide array of surgical procedures. RESULTS: For operations in which residents were involved, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for mortality was 0.93 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.97), as compared with the group of patients on whom attending surgeons operated alone without any level of resident involvement. For operations in which residents were involved, the adjusted OR for morbidity was 1.02 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.04), as compared with the group of patients on whom attending surgeons operated alone without any level of resident involvement. There was a slightly statistically significantly higher risk of cardiac and respiratory morbidities in the group with any level of resident involvement as compared with the "attending alone" group. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that, across different surgical subspecialties, resident involvement in surgery is associated with comparable morbidity and lower mortality outcomes. This provides a reassuring answer to patients, attending surgeons, and surgical program directors.

Impact of Preoperative Anaemia and Blood Transfusion on Postoperative Outcomes in Gynaecological Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of preoperative anaemia and blood transfusion on 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing gynecological surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Data were analyzed from 12,836 women undergoing operation in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Outcomes measured were; 30-day postoperative mortality, composite and specific morbidities (cardiac, respiratory, central nervous system, renal, wound, sepsis, venous thrombosis, or major bleeding). Multivariate logistic regression models were performed using adjusted odds ratios (ORadj) to assess the independent effects of preoperative anaemia (hematocrit <36.0%) on outcomes, effect estimates were performed before and after adjustment for perioperative transfusion requirement. RESULTS: The prevalence of preoperative anaemia was 23.9% (95%CI: 23.2-24.7). Adjusted for confounders by multivariate logistic regression; preoperative anaemia was independently and significantly associated with increased odds of 30-day mortality (OR: 2.40, 95%CI: 1.06-5.44) and composite morbidity (OR: 1.80, 95%CI: 1.45-2.24). This was reflected by significantly higher adjusted odds of almost all specific morbidities including; respiratory, central nervous system, renal, wound, sepsis, and venous thrombosis. Blood Transfusion increased the effect of preoperative anaemia on outcomes (61% of the effect on mortality and 16% of the composite morbidity). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative anaemia is associated with adverse post-operative outcomes in women undergoing gynecological surgery. This risk associated with preoperative anaemia did not appear to be corrected by use of perioperative transfusion.

Smoking and the risk of mortality and vascular and respiratory events in patients undergoing major surgery.

IMPORTANCE: The effects of smoking on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing major surgery are not fully established. The association between smoking and adverse postoperative outcomes has been confirmed. Whether the associations are dose dependent or restricted to patients with smoking-related disease remains to be determined. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between current and past smoking on the risk of postoperative mortality and vascular and respiratory events in patients undergoing major surgery. DESIGN: Cohort study using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. We obtained data on smoking history, perioperative risk factors, and 30-day postoperative outcomes. We assessed the effects of current and past smoking (>1 year prior) on postoperative outcomes after adjustment for potential confounders and effect mediators (eg, cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cancer). We also determined whether the effects are dose dependent through analysis of pack-year quintiles. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 607,558 adult patients undergoing major surgery in non-Veterans Affairs hospitals across the United States, Canada, Lebanon, and the United Arab Emirates during 2008 and 2009. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality; secondary outcome measures included arterial events (myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular accident), venous events (deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism), and respiratory events (pneumonia, unplanned intubation, or ventilator requirement >48 hours). RESULTS: The sample included 125,192 current (20.6%) and 78,763 past (13.0%) smokers. Increased odds of postoperative mortality were noted in current smokers only (odds ratio, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.10-1.24]). When we compared current and past smokers, the adjusted odds ratios were higher in the former for arterial events (1.65 [95% CI, 1.51-1.81] vs 1.20 [1.09-1.31], respectively) and respiratory events (1.45 [1.40-1.51] vs 1.13 [1.08-1.18], respectively). No effects on venous events were observed. The effects of smoking mediated through smoking-related disease were minimal. The increased adjusted odds of mortality in current smokers were evident from a smoking history of less than 10 pack-years, whereas the effects of smoking on arterial and respiratory events were incremental with increased pack-years. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Smoking cessation at least 1 year before major surgery abolishes the increased risk of postoperative mortality and decreases the risk of arterial and respiratory events evident in current smokers. These findings should be carried forward to evaluate the value and cost-effectiveness of intervention in this setting. Our study should increase awareness of the detrimental effects of smoking-and the benefits of its cessation-on morbidity and mortality in the surgical setting.