DARE Training: Teaching Educators How to Revise Internal Medicine Residency Lectures by Using an Anti-racism Framework.

Introduction: Systemic inequities and provider-held biases reinforce racism and further disparities in graduate medical education. We developed the Department of Medicine Anti-Racism and Equity Educational Initiative (DARE) to improve internal medicine residency conferences. We trained faculty and residents to serve as coaches to support other faculty in delivering lectures. The training leveraged a best-practices checklist to revise existing lectures. Methods: We recruited internal medicine faculty and residents to serve as DARE coaches, who supported educators in improving lectures' anti-racism content. During the training, coaches watched a videotaped didactic presentation that we created about health equity and anti-racism frameworks. DARE coaches then participated in a workshop where they engaged in case-based learning and small-group discussion to apply the DARE best-practices checklist to sample lecture slides. To assess training effectiveness, coaches completed pre- and posttraining assessments in which they edited different sample lecture slides. Our training took 1 hour to complete. Results: Thirty-four individuals completed DARE training. Following the training, the sample slides were significantly improved with respect to diversity of graphics (p < .001), discussion of research participant demographics (p < .001), and discussion of the impact of racism/bias on health disparities (p = .03). After DARE training, 23 of 24 participants (96%) endorsed feeling more prepared to bring an anti-racist framework to lectures and to support colleagues in doing the same. Discussion: Training residents and faculty to use DARE principles in delivering internal medicine lectures is an innovative and effective way to integrate anti-racism into internal medicine residency conferences.

An Anti-Racism and Equity Initiative Improves Residency Educational Conferences.

Background: Graduate medical education curricula may reinforce systemic inequities and bias, thus contributing to health disparities. Curricular interventions and evaluation measures are needed to increase trainee awareness of bias and known inequities in health care. Objective: This study sought to improve the content of core noontime internal medicine residency educational conferences by implementing the Department of Medicine Anti-Racism and Equity (DARE) educational initiative. Methods: DARE best practices were developed from available anti-racism and equity educational materials. Volunteer trainees and faculty in the department of medicine of a large urban academic medical center were recruited and underwent an hourlong training to utilize DARE best practices to coach faculty on improving the anti-racist and equity content of educational conferences. DARE coaches then met with faculty to review the planned 2021-2022 academic year (AY) lectures and facilitate alignment with DARE best practices. A rubric was created from DARE practices and utilized to compare pre-intervention (AY21) and post-intervention (AY22) conferences. Results: Using the DARE best practices while coaching increased the anti-racism and equity content from AY21 to AY22 (total rubric score mean [SD] 0.16 [1.19] to 1.38 [1.39]; P=.001; possible scores -4 to +5), with 75% (21 of 28) of AY22 conferences showing improvement. This included increased diversity of photographs, discussion of the racial or ethnic makeup of research study participants, appropriate use of race in case vignettes, and discussion of the impact of racism or bias on health disparities. Conclusions: Training coaches to implement DARE best practices improved the anti-racism and equity content of existing noontime internal medicine residency educational conferences.

Attitudes and Actions Related to Racism: the Anti-RaCism (ARC) Survey Study.

BACKGROUND: Racism negatively impacts health and well-being. Members of the medical community must intervene to address racism. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether attitudes about the impact of racism on health or society are associated with intervening around racism. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of a large department of medicine in an urban academic setting. PARTICIPANTS: Interns, residents, fellows, and faculty. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was the likelihood of intervening around an observed racist encounter or a racist policy. Predictor variables included age, gender identity, race/ethnicity, and attitudes about racism. KEY RESULTS: Although the majority of the 948 respondents endorsed the impact of racism on health and other societal effects, levels of endorsement were lower among older individuals, or those reporting male gender identity or selecting other race. Higher endorsement of the impact of racism on health was associated with increased odds of speaking up about a racist encounter or racist policy, with odds ratios from 1.18 to 1.30 across scenarios. Likelihood of speaking up about racism did not differ by racial or ethnic group, but older individuals were generally more likely to speak up and individuals between 20 and 29 years of age were more likely to speak with someone other than leadership or the source of a racist encounter. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of the effects of racism on health is associated with increased likelihood of intervening when a racist encounter is observed or a racist policy is noted. Including information on the impact of racism on health and creating safe spaces to discuss racism may increase the likelihood of bystander intervention in anti-racism strategies.

This is our lane: talking with patients about racism.

Racism has significantly impacted communities of color for centuries. The year 2020 is a reminder that racism is an ongoing public health crisis. Healthcare institutions have an important role in dismantling racism because of their ability to implement innovative solutions that advance diversity, address social determinants of health, and promote health equity. Healthcare professionals have the unique opportunity to support patients by discussing patients' experiences of bias and racism. Asking about discrimination, however, can be difficult because of the sensitive nature of the topic and lack of appropriate education. This review highlights the importance of addressing patients' experiences of racism, utilizing the frameworks of trauma-informed care, structural competency, provider bias, and intersectionality. Furthermore, this review provides ways to engage in meaningful dialogue around discrimination and includes important patient-centric resources.

Prescribing Outdoor Play: Outdoors Rx.

Studies support the use of exercise prescriptions in adults, but few studies have evaluated their use in children. One common barrier to effective physical activity counseling is lack of resources. Outdoors Rx is a collaboration between the Appalachian Mountain Club and the Massachusetts General Hospital for Children that pairs exercise prescriptions with guided outdoor programs to increase physical activity among children. This article describes the design and implementation of Outdoors Rx at 2 community health centers serving ethnically diverse, low-income, urban families, as well as evaluates feedback from participating pediatricians regarding the utility of the program, barriers to success, and suggestions for improvement. Our results illustrate the feasibility of implementing a pediatric physical activity prescription program in community health centers serving traditionally underserved populations. Our data suggest that physical activity prescription programs are well received by both pediatricians and families and are a useful tool for facilitating physical activity counseling.