A prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial to assess the effects of leukocyte-reduced platelet-rich plasma on pro-inflammatory, degradative, and anabolic biomarkers after closed pilon fractures.

Posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) significantly affects patients with pilon fractures even after adequate anatomical reduction, and treatment strategies targeting the biologic mediators of PTOA are needed. This study was designed to determine the effects of intra-articular injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on synovial fluid (SF) biomarkers for patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of pilon fractures. Patients undergoing staged management of pilon fractures were enrolled in a prospective, double-blinded, randomized, and placebo-controlled clinical trial to determine the effects of a single intra-articular injection of leukocyte-reduced PRP on SF biomarkers. Arthrocentesis of the injured and uninjured ankles was performed at the time of external skeletal fixation (ESF) and ORIF. Patients were randomized to receive either autogenous leukocyte-reduced PRP or saline (control) via intra-articular injection into the injured ankle at the time of ESF. SF biomarker concentrations were compared-uninjured, injured pretreatment, and saline-injected or PRP-injected. Eleven patients (PRP, n = 5; saline, n = 6) completed the study. Twenty-one uninjured, and 11 injured pretreatment, five PRP-treated, and six saline-treated SF samples were analyzed. PRP-treated SF contained significantly higher levels of PDGF-AA (p = 0.046) and significantly lower levels of MMP-3 (p = 0.042), MMP-9 (p = 0.009), IL-1ß (p = 0.049), IL-6 (p < 0.01), IL-8 (p = 0.048), and PGE2 (p < 0.04). This study provided mechanistic data to suggest that a single intraarticular injection of leukocyte-reduced PRP is associated with anti-inflammatory, anti-degradative, and anabolic responses compared with saline control. These findings provide the impetus for investigating long-term clinical outcomes after PRP injection as an orthobiologic adjunct to ORIF for mitigating the incidence and severity of PTOA after pilon fractures.

Dispersal Pattern of Injectate After Cervical Epidural Steroid Injection Evaluated With Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized, clinical study. OBJECTIVE: Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are an important diagnostic and treatment modality for spine pathology. The success of these injections has been attributed to the anatomic location reached by the injectate. This study evaluates injectate dispersal patterns after cervical interlaminar ESI using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Patients between the ages of 18 and 85 years with cervical radiculopathy were identified. After obtaining consent for study participation, a gadolinium-enhanced cervical ESI was administered via an interlaminar approach under fluoroscopic guidance. Study participants underwent a cervical spine MRI within 15 minutes of administering the injection. Craniocaudal dispersal and the presence or absence of circumferential dispersal was assessed. RESULTS: The injectate dispersed a mean of 8.11 cm in the cranial direction, 6.63 cm in the caudal direction, and 360° circumferentially. No adverse events related to the ESI were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroscopy-guided cervical interlaminar ESI resulted in nearly uniform circumferential dispersal within the epidural space with multilevel migration in the cranial and caudal directions. MRI is a safe and accurate tool to evaluate spinal injectate dispersal.

The Use of Fluoroscopy During Direct Anterior Hip Arthroplasty: Powerful or Misleading?

BACKGROUND: Direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty (THA) with fluoroscopic assistance is growing in popularity. Variables such as pelvic tilt, c-arm technique, and patient positioning can affect the perceived fluoroscopic view. This study evaluates the effect of these variables on the position of the acetabular component. METHODS: Forty-one hips in 40 patients undergoing direct anterior arthroplasty THA with fluoroscopic assistance underwent routine postoperative radiographs and postoperative pelvic computed tomography scan. The acetabular component position as defined by a 3-dimensional reconstruction was compared to the surgeon's intraoperative perception of the component's position and compared to routine postoperative plain radiograph measurements. RESULTS: Although fluoroscopy was used to create an anteroposterior pelvic radiograph utilizing the coccyx to pubis symphysis distance, a 3D reconstruction created in the same pelvic orientation as the fluoroscopic images confirmed that 39/41 hips were placed with unrecognized excess of anteversion and inclination secondary to imaging the pelvis in extension. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative imaging during supine direct anterior arthroplasty THA confirms appropriate component placement. Pelvic tilt can greatly affect the perceived position of the acetabular component and cannot be accurately compensated for by assessing the relationship between the coccyx and pubic symphysis due to morphologic variation and orientation. We recommend positioning the c-arm so that the size and shape of the obturator foramen matches the standing preoperative anteroposterior pelvis image. This technique allows for the native standing pelvic tilt to be accounted for intraoperatively and will result in the least variation in intraoperative and postoperative standing acetabular component orientation.