Prescribing Trends of Topical Glaucoma Medications in Australia From 2001 to 2017.

PRECIS: As new glaucoma treatments arise, including minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries and new classes of glaucoma medications, it is important to examine the prescription trends of current topical glaucoma medications and how they may change. PURPOSE: To determine the prescribing trends of topical glaucoma medications in Australia from 2001 to 2017. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) item numbers were used to determine glaucoma medication prescribing rates from 2001 to 2017. All data were adjusted for population (/100,000) as per the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) population data. RESULTS: Overall prescription rates for glaucoma medications ranged between 67,904 and 86,936 per 100,000 from 2001 to 2017. An upward trend was noted from 2001 to 2015, with the exception of a notable decline in 2013 by 14.7%, before then increasing by 13.7% in 2014. After 2015, prescribing rates were seen to decrease over the subsequent years in the study period. Latanoprost remained the most prescribed medication and prostaglandin the most prescribed class. Prescribing rates of single-agent beta-blockers were noted to decrease during the 17-year period, particularly with the introduction of combination agents, which note an upward trend. Brinzolamide/brimonidine has increased by 50.0% from 2016 to 2017. CONCLUSIONS: Total rates of prescriptions have remained relatively stable from 2001 to 2017. The number of medications prescribed when considering combination agents separately was seen to be increasing from 2001 to 2015. From 2015 to 2017, a downward trend was noted in the number of medications prescribed. Prostaglandins remain the most prescribed class throughout the study period.

Knocked by the shuttlecock: twelve sight-threatening blunt-eye injuries in Australian badminton players.

BACKGROUND: Non-penetrating ocular injuries from badminton shuttlecocks can result in severe damage and life-long complications. This case series highlights the morbidity of such injuries, particularly in regard to post-traumatic glaucoma. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of 12 patients with shuttlecock-related blunt eye injuries sustained during badminton play without eye protection. By approaching colleagues through conference presentations and networking, the authors have attempted to gather all known cases of shuttlecock ocular injury managed in tertiary ocular emergency departments or private ophthalmological clinics in Victoria and New South Wales, Australia in 2015. RESULTS: This is the first multicentre case series to describe badminton-related ocular injuries in Australia. Our case series demonstrates, in particular, long-term glaucoma-related morbidity for patients over a large age range (16 to 77 years), with one patient requiring ongoing management 26 years following their initial injury. The cases reported further add to the literature promoting awareness of badminton-related ocular injury. CONCLUSIONS: We encourage player education and advocacy on badminton-related eye injuries and appropriate use of eye protection to reduce associated morbidity.