The emerging use of chemotherapy-free regimens in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Before the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the outcome of patients with a diagnosis of Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia was dismal. Combinations of TKIs and chemotherapy improved survival rates, but allogeneic stem cell transplant was still relied on to avoid relapse in most cases. More recently, the chemotherapy-free combination of blinatumomab plus newer-generation TKIs has shown favorable results and may eliminate the need for allogeneic stem cell transplant. This review discusses the evolution of the treatment of Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia with chemotherapy-free regimens in the current era.

Selecting the optimal BTK inhibitor therapy in CLL: rationale and practical considerations.

Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors have dramatically changed the treatment of newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and zanubrutinib are Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved BTK inhibitors that have all demonstrated progression-free survival (PFS) benefit compared with chemoimmunotherapy. The efficacy of these agents compared to one another is under study; however, current data suggest they provide similar efficacy. Selectivity for BTK confers different adverse effect profiles, and longer follow-up and real-world use have characterized side effects over time. The choice of BTK inhibitor is largely patient-specific, and this review aims to highlight the differences among the agents and guide the choice of BTK inhibitor in clinical practice.

Blinatumomab is associated with favorable outcomes in patients with B-cell lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia and positive measurable residual disease at a threshold of 10-4 and higher.

The presence of measurable residual disease (MRD) is the strongest predictor of relapse in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We conducted a prospective, single-arm, phase II study in adults with B-cell ALL with MRD ≥1 × 10-4 after ≥3 months from the start of frontline therapy or one month from any salvage therapy. Blinatumomab was administered at a standard dosing of 28 micrograms daily as a continuous infusion for up to five cycles and up to four additional maintenance cycles. Thirty-seven patients with a median age of 43 years (range, 22-84 years) were treated. Twenty-seven patients (73%) were treated in first complete remission (CR) and 10 patients (27%) in second CR and beyond. Eighteen patients (49%) had Philadelphia-chromosome positive ALL and received concomitant tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Twenty-three patients (62%) had a baseline MRD ≥10-3 . A median of three cycles (range, 1-9 cycles) were administered. Overall, 27 patients (73%) achieved MRD-negative remission. With a median follow-up of 31 months (range, 5-70 months), the estimated 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was 63% (95% confidence interval [CI], 43%-77%) and overall survival (OS) rate 67% (95% CI, 46%-81%). These rates were 51% (95% CI, 27%-70%) and 61% (95% CI, 36%-78%) in patients with baseline MRD ≥1 × 10-3 , and 83% (95% CI, 45%-95%) and 77% (95% CI, 32%-95%) in patients with baseline MRD <10-3 respectively. The rates of adverse events were consistent with previous studies of blinatumomab. In summary, blinatumomab induced MRD negativity in most patients and resulted in high rates of RFS and OS. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02458014. Funding was provided by Amgen Inc.

Management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in older adults.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia, commonly known to affect the younger population, is a disease that is affecting the elderly in an increasing amount as the human life span continues to lengthen. Traditional cytotoxic agents are intolerable to elderly individuals owing to comorbidities, weakened immune systems, and organ dysfunction. Alternative agents and regimens are needed to allow for elderly patient to tolerate full cycles of therapy while providing complete and durable remissions. With the advent of targeted agents, such as monoclonal antibodies and bispecific T-cell engagers, a number of options have proven themselves to be effective in the elderly and optimal for tolerability. Here, we review and discuss the literature addressing regimens that use new agents, such as blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, and venetoclax, and those that use modified dosing strategies of traditional chemotherapy.

Clinical and molecular characteristics and treatment patterns of adolescent and young adult patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.

Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) rarely presents in adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients (patients aged 15-39 years). Disease characteristics and outcomes of AYA patients with CLL are not well understood, particularly in the era of novel oral targeted therapies. We analysed outcomes of 227 AYA patients with CLL diagnosed in the last two decades and evaluated at our institution. Median time to first treatment (TTFT) was 2·2 years, and five- and 10-year overall survival (OS) were 90% and 78%, respectively. Pre-treatment elevated beta 2-microglobulin, advanced Rai stage, del(11q) or del(17p) by FISH, unmutated IGHV and CD38 positivity were associated with both shorter TTFT and OS. Within the subgroup of patients who received oral targeted therapy at any time, del(11q) or del(17p) and complex karyotype were associated with shorter OS. First-line treatment choice was significantly associated with time to second treatment (P < 0·001). Patients harbouring del(11q) or del(17p) experienced shorter time to Richter transformation and were more likely to undergo an allogeneic stem cell transplant. There was a significant association between age and both OS and time to Richter transformation. Our study is the first analysis of AYA patients with CLL with a large number of patients treated with oral targeted therapies.

Duration of cytopenias with concomitant venetoclax and azole antifungals in acute myeloid leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Venetoclax (VEN) combined with the hypomethylating agent (HMA) azacitidine improves survival in patients aged ≥75 years with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). VEN and HMA treatment can result in prolonged and often profound neutropenia, and this warrants antifungal prophylaxis. Azole antifungals inhibit cytochrome P450 3A4, the primary enzyme responsible for VEN metabolism; this results in VEN dose reductions for each concomitant antifungal. Limited clinical data exist on outcomes for patients treated with VEN, an HMA, and various azoles. METHODS: The time to neutrophil recovery (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] > 1000 cells/mm3 ) and platelet (PLT) recovery (PLT count > 100,000 cells/mm3 ) in 64 patients with newly diagnosed AML who achieved a response after course 1 of VEN plus an HMA were evaluated. HMA therapy included azacitidine (75 mg/m2 intravenously/subcutaneously for 7 days) or decitabine (20 mg/m2 intravenously for 5 or 10 days). RESULTS: Forty-seven patients (73%) received an azole: posaconazole (n = 17; 27%), voriconazole (n = 9; 14%), isavuconazole (n = 20; 31%), or fluconazole (n = 1; 2%). The median time to ANC recovery were similar for patients who did receive an azole (37 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], 34-38 days) and patients who did not receive an azole (39 days; 95% CI, 30 days to not estimable; P = .8). The median time to PLT recovery was significantly longer for patients receiving azoles (28 vs 22 days; P = .01). The median times to ANC recovery (35 vs 38 days) and PLT recovery (26 vs 32 days) were similar with posaconazole and voriconazole. CONCLUSIONS: VEN plus an HMA resulted in neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, with the latter prolonged in patients receiving concomitant azoles. Concomitant posaconazole or voriconazole and VEN (100 mg) resulted in similar ANC and PLT recovery times, suggesting the safety of these dosage combinations during course 1.

Phase 2 study of lenalidomide maintenance for patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia in remission.

BACKGROUND: New drug combinations have led to significant improvements in remission rates for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, many patients with high-risk AML who respond to their initial treatment and are not candidates for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) will eventually relapse with poor outcomes. METHODS: In this phase 2 trial, the efficacy of lenalidomide maintenance was evaluated in patients with high-risk AML who had achieved their first or second remission after induction chemotherapy and at least 1 consolidation cycle and who were not candidates for immediate ASCT. Lenalidomide was given orally at 10 to 20 mg daily on days 1 to 28 of a 28-day cycle for up to 24 cycles. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients were enrolled in this study with a median age of 61 years (range, 24-87 years). The median number of cycles was 8 (range, 1-24 cycles). Ten patients (36%) completed 24 months of maintenance treatment. With a median follow-up of 22.5 months (range, 2.6-55 months), 12 patients (43%) relapsed after a median of 3 months (range, 0.7-23 months). The median duration of remission for all patients was 18.7 months (range, 0.7-55.1 months). The 2-year overall survival and relapse-free survival rates from the time of enrollment were 63% and 50%, respectively. Overall, lenalidomide was well tolerated; serious adverse events of grade 3 or 4, including rash (n = 5), thrombocytopenia (n = 4), neutropenia (n = 4), and fatigue (n = 2), were observed in 13 patients (46%). CONCLUSIONS: Lenalidomide is a safe and feasible maintenance strategy in patients with high-risk AML who are not candidates for ASCT, and it has beneficial effects for patients with negative measurable residual disease.

Monoclonal antibodies in frontline acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

The recent development of monoclonal antibodies targeting CD19, CD20, and CD22 has significantly improved long-term survival in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), both in the frontline and relapsed and refractory setting. The incorporation of CD20 monoclonal antibodies (e.g. rituximab) has improved cure rates from 35% to 50% in those with precursor B-cell ALL and from 40 to 80% in those with Burkitt leukemia. More novel antibodies, such as drug conjugates antibodies (e.g. inotuzumab ozogamicin) and bispecific T-cell engagers (e.g. blinatumomab), have shown significant promise in improving outcomes in the relapsed and refractory setting and are currently being studied in the frontline setting, with hopes to further improve long-term outcomes. In this chapter, we will review the role of monoclonal antibodies and how the incorporation of these agents has revolutionized and changed the treatment management of ALL in the frontline setting.

Antibody based therapy in relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Outcomes for relapsed and refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remain poor. With the advent of targeted monoclonal antibodies and antibody constructs, these outcomes have been significantly improved both in the frontline and salvage setting. These targets include a bispecific antibody that targets both CD3 and CD19, known as blinatumomab, as well as a conjugated antibody that targets CD22, known as inotuzumab ozogamicin. These agents have been thoroughly studied and successively approved for use as monotherapy, however, more recently they have been incorporated in combination or sequentially with cytotoxic chemotherapy. In this chapter, we will discuss the role that these monoclonal antibodies play as monotherapy and in combination in the treatment of ALL in the salvage setting, and how they continue to transform the treatment management of relapsed and refractory ALL.

Cell cycle inhibitors for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia: a review of phase 2 & 3 clinical trials.

Introduction: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a clinically heterogeneous hematologic malignancy with poor long term outcomes. Cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the backbone of therapy especially among younger patients; however the effective incorporation of targeted therapies continues to be an area of active research in an effort to improve response durations and survival. Cell cycle inhibitors (CCI) are a novel class of agents which may be of particular interest for development in patients with AML. Areas covered: We will review the concept of CCIs along with available pre-clinical and clinical data in the treatment of AML both in North America and abroad. Specific drug targets reviewed include cyclin D kinase, Aurora kinase, CHK1, and WEE1. Expert opinion: Utilization of CCIs in patients with AML is an emerging approach that has shown promise in pre-clinical models. It has been challenging to translate this concept into clinical success thus far, due to marginal single-agent activity and significant toxicity profiles, however clinical evaluation is ongoing. Addition of these agents to cytotoxic chemotherapy and other targeted therapies provides a potential combinatorial path forward for this novel class of therapies. Developing optimal combinations while balancing toxicity are among the top clinical challenges that must be overcome before we can anticipate adoption of these agents into the armamentarium of AML therapy.

Outcomes of combination therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma - A retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a highly vascularized and immunogenic tumor. At the time of this study, there was limited published data on the combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients who were heavily pretreated. At our institution, providers have used these combinations in heavily pretreated patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients receiving this combination with the primary objectives of assessing duration of therapy and toxicities and a secondary objective of disease progression at six months. We included adult patients with confirmed mRCC receiving combination therapy (immune checkpoint inhibitors/tyrosine kinase inhibitors) any time after January 2015. Electronic medical records were reviewed for pertinent data and follow-up descriptive statistics were performed. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were on combination immune checkpoint inhibitors/tyrosine kinase inhibitors, with a median of three lines of previous therapy. The median duration of combination therapy was 7.2 months (range: 0.2 to 39.8) with 126 incidences of toxicities. The most frequent toxicity was fatigue (n = 15), followed by diarrhea (n = 8), anorexia (n = 7) and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (n = 7). Overall, 9 (60%) patients experienced at least one grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Eight of 15 (53%) patients remained on therapy at the six-month mark and did not have progression confirmed by an oncologist. Of the 15 patients, 10 discontinued therapy due to progression, 2 due to intolerable side effects, 2 transitioned to end of life care, and 1 patient was still ongoing at the time of data collection. CONCLUSION: Based on this review, it appears that combination tyrosine kinase inhibitors/immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy in pre-treated patients with mRCC is tolerable and beneficial.