Comparison of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality Between Standard Versus Telephone-Basic Life Support Training Program in Middle-Aged and Elderly Housewives: A Randomized Simulation Study.

INTRODUCTION: For cardiac arrests witnessed at home, the witness is usually a middle-aged or older housewife. We compared the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performance of bystanders trained with the newly developed telephone-basic life support (T-BLS) program and those trained with standard BLS (S-BLS) training programs. METHODS: Twenty-four middle-aged and older housewives without previous CPR education were enrolled and randomized into two groups of BLS training programs. The T-BLS training program included concepts and current instruction protocols for telephone-assisted CPR, whereas the S-BLS training program provided training for BLS. After each training course, the participants simulated CPR and were assisted by a dispatcher via telephone. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality was measured and recorded using a mannequin simulator. The primary outcome was total no-flow time (>1.5 seconds without chest compression) during simulation. RESULTS: Among 24 participants, two (8.3%) who experienced mechanical failure of simulation mannequin and one (4.2%) who violated simulation protocols were excluded at initial simulation, and two (8.3%) refused follow-up after 6 months. The median (interquartile range) total no-flow time during initial simulation was 79.6 (66.4-96.9) seconds for the T-BLS training group and 147.6 (122.5-184.0) seconds for the S-BLS training group (P < 0.01). Median cumulative interruption time and median number of interruption events during BLS at initial simulation and 6-month follow-up simulation were significantly shorter in the T-BLS than in the S-BLS group (1.0 vs. 9.5, P < 0.01, and 1.0 vs. 10.5, P = 0.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Participants trained with the T-BLS training program showed shorter no-flow time and fewer interruptions during bystander CPR simulation assisted by a dispatcher.

Quality between mechanical compression on reducible stretcher versus manual compression on standard stretcher in small elevator.

OBJECTIVES: Manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during vertical transport in small elevators using standard stretcher for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest can raise concerns with diminishing quality. Mechanical CPR on a reducible stretcher (RS-CPR) that can be shortened in the length was tested to compare the CPR quality with manual CPR on a standard stretcher (SS-CPR). METHODS: A randomized crossover manikin simulation was designed. Three teams of emergency medical technicians were recruited to perform serial CPR simulations using two different protocols (RS-CPR and SS-CPR) according to a randomization; the first 6 minutes of manual CPR at the scene was identical for both scenarios and two different protocols during vertical transport in a small elevator followed on a basis of cross-over assignment. The LUCAS-2 Chest Compression System (Zolife AB, Lund, Sweden) was used for RS-CPR. CPR quality was measured using a resuscitation manikin (Resusci Anne QCPR, Laerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway) in terms of no flow fraction, compression depth, and rate (median and IQR). RESULTS: A total of 42 simulations were analyzed. CPR quality did not differ significantly at the scene. No flow fraction (%) was significantly lower when the stretcher was moving in RS-CPR then SS-CPR (36.0 (33.8-38.7) vs 44.0 (36.8-54.4), P< .01). RS-CPR showed significantly better quality than SS-CPR; 93.2 (50.6-95.6) vs 14.8 (0-20.8) for adequate depth (P< 0.01), and 97.5 (96.6-98.2) vs 68.9(43.4-78.5) for adequate rate (P< .01). CONCLUSION: Mechanical CPR on a reducible stretcher during vertical transport showed significant improvement in CPR quality in terms of no-flow fraction, compression depth, and rate compared with manual CPR on a standard stretcher.

Interaction of the diabetes mellitus and cardiac diseases on survival outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) and cardiac disease (CD) both likely effect out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival, but the effect of their relationship on survival outcomes is unclear. This study aims to investigate whether the association of DM and OHCA outcomes differ in patients with and without CD. METHODS: The study was conducted from the national cardiac arrest registry among OHCA patients who survived to hospital admission from 2009 to 2013. Clinical histories of DM and CD were abstracted from patient medical records. Multivariable logistic regression analysis with an interaction term (DM and CD) was performed to calculate adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for survival to discharge and good cerebral performance category 1 or 2 (good CPC). RESULTS: Among 7583 study-eligible patients, 2651 (34.96%) patients had been previously diagnosed as having DM where 639 (24.1%) diabetic and 753 (15.3%) nondiabetic patients had CD (P<.01). Diabetes mellitus was observed to have harmful effect on survival and good CPC (AORs, 0.84 [0.75-0.95] and 0.81 [0.67-0.97]), whereas CD had nonsignificant effect (AORs, 1.34 [1.17-1.54] and 1.14 [0.94-1.38]). Diabetes mellitus had a significant negative association with survival outcomes in patients with CD (AORs, 0.58 [0.45-0.74] for survival and 0.52 [0.36-0.75] for good CPC), whereas the association was nonsignificant in patients without CD (AORs, 0.93 [0.82-1.06] for survival and [0.76-1.14] for good CPC). CONCLUSION: Diabetes mellitus had a significant negative association with survival to discharge and neurologic recovery among patients with CD, but the association was not significant in patients without CD.

Preventive Effects of Seat Belt on Clinical Outcomes for Road Traffic Injuries.

Proper seat belt use saves lives; however, the use rate decreased in Korea. This study aimed to measure the magnitude of the preventive effect of seat belt on case-fatality across drivers and passengers. We used the Emergency Department based Injury In-depth Surveillance (EDIIS) database from 17 EDs between 2011 and 2012. All of adult injured patients from road traffic injuries (RTI) in-vehicle of less than 10-seat van were eligible, excluding cases with unknown seat belt use and outcomes. Primary and secondary endpoints were in-hospital mortality and intracranial injury. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (AORs) of seat belt use and driving status for study outcomes adjusting for potential confounders. Among 23,698 eligible patients, 15,304 (64.6%) wore seat belts. Driver, middle aged (30-44 yr), male, daytime injured patients were more likely to use seat belts (all P < 0.001). In terms of clinical outcome, no seat belt group had higher proportions of case-fatality and intracranial injury compared to seat belt group (both P < 0.001). Compared to seat belt group, AORs (95% CIs) of no seat belt group were 10.43 (7.75-14.04) for case-fatality and 2.68 (2.25-3.19) for intracranial injury respectively. In the interaction model, AORs (95% CIs) of no seat belt use for case-fatality were 11.71 (8.45-16.22) in drivers and 5.52 (2.83-14.76) in non-driving passengers, respectively. Wearing seat belt has significantly preventive effects on case-fatality and intracranial injury. Public health efforts to increase seat belt use are needed to reduce health burden from RTIs.

Interaction effects between hypothermia and diabetes mellitus on survival outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

OBJECTIVES: Mild therapeutic hypothermia (MTH) is the core hospital intervention to enhance neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Diabetes mellitus (DM) has been known to be a harmful risk factor on survival after OHCA. This study aimed to investigate whether the effect of MTH on brain recovery after OHCA differed between patients with or without DM. METHODS: We used a Korean national OHCA database composed of hospital and ambulance data. We included adult OHCA patients who survived to admission with presumed cardiac etiology during the study period from 2009 to 2013. We excluded cases without hospital outcome data. The primary exposure was MTH, which included all kinds of cooling methods that had been initiated within 6h after return of spontaneous circulation. DM was coded positive when the patient had a clinical history diagnosed by a physician before an OHCA event. The endpoints were discharge with good neurological recovery (cerebral performance category 1 or 2) and survival to discharge. We compared outcomes between MTH vs. non-MTH groups using multivariable logistic regression with an interaction term between MTH and DM for calculating adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) after adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Among 9735 patients following OHCA survived to hospital admission with cardiac etiology, MTH was performed in 16.5%. History of DM was observed in 25.4% among MTH group and 27.4% in non-MTH group (p=0.09). MTH group showed better outcomes than non-MTH group; 23.6% vs. 15.7% for good neurological recovery (p<0.01). AOR (95% CI) of MTH for good neurological recovery for all study groups was 1.23 (1.03-1.47). In the interaction model, AOR (95% CI) of MTH for good neurological recovery was 1.40 (1.16-1.70) in patients without DM vs. 0.69 (0.46-1.04) in patients with DM. For survival to discharge, the effects of MTH were different in patients without DM (1.97 (1.70-2.29)) and patients with DM (1.23 (0.96-1.57)). CONCLUSION: DM modified the effect of MTH on survival and neurological outcomes for OHCA survivors. MTH is significantly associated with good neurological recovery in patients without DM, but not in patients with DM.