Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Nurse Educ ; 47(5): E109-E113, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35324496

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As there is an increasing trend in the number of male-identifying learners in undergraduate nursing education, a need exists to identify the gender differences in learners' perceptions regarding simulation-based learning. PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify the gender differences in psychological safety, academic safety, cognitive load, and debriefing satisfaction in simulation-based nursing education. METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive survey was implemented with 97 female and 95 male nursing students. Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U tests or independent-samples t tests. RESULTS: Female nursing students reported a lower academic safety and higher intrinsic load than male nursing students. Male nursing students perceived a higher germane load than female nursing students. CONCLUSIONS: The significance of the present study was the identification of gender differences in participant perception of the simulation learning experience for effective simulation design.


Subject(s)
Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate , Students, Nursing , Clinical Competence , Cognition , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Nursing Education Research , Personal Satisfaction , Sex Factors , Students, Nursing/psychology
2.
Nurs Health Sci ; 19(4): 485-491, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28851087

ABSTRACT

Simulation-based education has escalated worldwide, yet few studies have rigorously explored predictors of learner engagement with simulation debriefing. The purpose of this cross-sectional, descriptive survey was to identify factors that determine learner engagement with simulation debriefing among nursing students. A convenience sample of 296 Korean nursing students enrolled in the simulation-based course completed the survey. A total of five instruments were used: (i) Characteristics of Debriefing; (ii) Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare - Student Version; (iii) The Korean version of the Simulation Design Scale; (iv) Communication Skills Scale; and (v) Clinical-Based Stress Scale. Multiple regression analysis was performed using the variables to investigate the influencing factors. The results indicated that influencing factors of learning engagement with simulation debriefing were simulation design, confidentiality, stress, and number of students. Simulation design was the most important factor. Video-assisted debriefing was not a significant factor affecting learner engagement. Educators should organize and conduct debriefing activities while considering these factors to effectively induce learner engagement. Further study is needed to identify the effects of debriefing sessions targeting learners' needs and considering situational factors on learning outcomes.


Subject(s)
Simulation Training/standards , Students, Nursing/psychology , Transfer, Psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate/methods , Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate/standards , Female , Humans , Male , Simulation Training/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...