Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Debridement for Lateral Epicondylitis with Partial Injury of the Lateral Collateral Ligament Complex.

Background: Lateral collateral ligament injuries may occur in patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis. The present study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic debridement between patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis combined with a partial ligament injury and those without a ligament injury. Methods: Between 2016 and 2018, patients who underwent arthroscopic debridement for lateral epicondylitis were evaluated. Partial injury to the lateral collateral ligament was defined as discontinuity or thinning with increased signal of the lateral ligament on magnetic resonance imaging and laxity with a firm endpoint in the varus or posterolateral rotatory stress test. Arthroscopic debridement was performed when there was no apparent instability in the stress test under fluoroscopic guidance after anesthesia. Patients with a ligament injury were compared with those without a ligament injury in terms of physical examination (varus stress test and posterolateral rotatory drawer test), pain visual analog scale, Mayo elbow performance score, and quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score. Results: There were 38 patients in the intact ligament group and 15 patients in the partial ligament injury group. There were 23 men and 30 women, and the mean patient age was 50 years (range, 27-77 years). The mean follow-up period was 30 months (range, 24-49 months). Instability was not observed in both groups at the last follow-up, and clinical scores improved significantly after surgery. Postoperative results did not show significant difference between the two groups. One patient in the partial injury group underwent revision open debridement owing to persistent pain. Conclusions: The clinical outcomes of arthroscopic debridement for lateral epicondylitis did not show significant differences between patients with a partial ligament injury and those without a ligament injury.

Artificial intelligence-based classification of bone tumors in the proximal femur on plain radiographs: System development and validation.

PURPOSE: Early detection and classification of bone tumors in the proximal femur is crucial for their successful treatment. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model to classify bone tumors in the proximal femur on plain radiographs. METHODS: Standard anteroposterior hip radiographs were obtained from a single tertiary referral center. A total of 538 femoral images were set for the AI model training, including 94 with malignant, 120 with benign, and 324 without tumors. The image data were pre-processed to be optimized for training of the deep learning model. The state-of-the-art convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithms were applied to pre-processed images to perform three-label classification (benign, malignant, or no tumor) on each femur. The performance of the CNN model was verified using fivefold cross-validation and was compared against that of four human doctors. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of the best performing CNN model for the three-label classification was 0.953 (95% confidence interval, 0.926-0.980). The diagnostic accuracy of the model (0.853) was significantly higher than that of the four doctors (0.794) (P = 0.001) and also that of each doctor individually (0.811, 0.796, 0.757, and 0.814, respectively) (P<0.05). The mean sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1 score of the CNN models were 0.822, 0.912, 0.829, and 0.822, respectively, whereas the mean values of four doctors were 0.751, 0.889, 0.762, and 0.797, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The AI-based model demonstrated high performance in classifying the presence of bone tumors in the proximal femur on plain radiographs. Our findings suggest that AI-based technology can potentially reduce the misdiagnosis of doctors who are not specialists in musculoskeletal oncology.

Factors Affecting Rebound Phenomenon After Temporary Hemiepiphysiodesis and Implant Removal for Idiopathic Genu Valgum in Adolescent Patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate factors determining postoperative courses, especially focusing on the rebound phenomenon, in adolescent patients with idiopathic genu valgum who underwent temporary hemiepiphysiodesis and implant removal. METHODS: We identified and reviewed patients with idiopathic genu valgum treated with temporary hemiepiphysiodesis [using tension-band plates (plate group, PG) or transphyseal screws (screw group, SG)] and followed-up to skeletal maturity. RESULTS: In our cohort [68 patients and their 68 limbs (randomly selected in bilateral cases)], the mean hip-knee-ankle alignment was -5.4±1.8 degrees at the time of temporary hemiepiphysiodesis (negative means valgus), 2.6±2.1 degrees at the time of implant removal, and 0.7±2.6 degrees at the last follow-up, respectively. Regarding the implants, the correction speed was not significantly different (P=0.192-0.315) between the PG (total 1.29±0.37 degrees/mo, 0.71±0.23 degrees/mo at distal femur, 0.59±0.16 degrees/mo at proximal tibia, n=19) and the SG (total 1.22±0.49 degrees/mo, 0.65±0.25 degrees/mo at distal femur, 0.57±0.23 degrees/mo at proximal tibia, n=49). The magnitude of rebound phenomenon in the PG (4.1±1.9 degrees) was greater (P<0.001) than that in the SG (1.1±3.1 degrees). The use of plates and faster correction speed, rather than more severe preoperative deformity or greater correction angle, were positively associated with the rebound phenomenon in regression analyses. Among the 68 knees, 1 showed valgus alignment ≥5 degrees and 5 showed varus alignment ≥5 degrees at the last follow-up. All the 6 cases were observed in the SG. Surgical wound dehiscence was observed in 1 patient in the PG. CONCLUSIONS: The use of plates and faster correction speed were positively associated with the rebound phenomenon. Careful attention will be needed with the corresponding conditions for optimal results. Progressive genu varum after transphyseal screw removal, which was observed in this study, should be explored in future research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective comparative series.

Outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty using the modular dual mobility acetabular system to treat recurrent dislocation.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent dislocation is a difficult complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to report the clinical and radiographic outcomes of revision THA using the modular dual mobility (MDM) acetabular system to treat recurrent dislocation. METHODS: Between March 2015 and February 2019, 34 revision THAs were performed using the MDM system for treating recurrent dislocation in a single institution. Of these, 32 revision THAs (32 patients) that satisfied a minimum follow-up of one year (mean, 4 years) were included in this study. Patient-reported outcomes, complication rates, and radiographic results were evaluated. RESULTS: Seventeen patients (53.1%) had lumbar degenerative kyphosis, and six (18.8%) had surgically fused lumbar spines during the index operation. All acetabular components were revised, whereas femoral stems were retained in 29 patients (90.6%). No redislocation or intraprosthetic dislocation was noted after revision. One additional revision was required for acetabular loosening with periprosthetic joint infection. No additional revision was performed for aseptic loosening. A partial radiolucent line was found in two hips (6.3%) confined to one acetabular zone. CONCLUSIONS: Revision THA using the MDM system was effective in treating recurrent dislocation in a group of patients with a high prevalence of lumbar spinal pathology. During a mean follow-up of 4 years, one additional revision THA was performed for septic loosening and none for aseptic loosening.

Clinically Reliable Knee Flexion Angle Measured on Stress Radiography for Quantifying Posterior Instability in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.

BACKGROUND: After posterior cruciate ligament injury, stress radiography is a common method of quantifying posterior instability, defined as the side-to-side difference in posterior tibial displacement (PTD) between the injured knee and contralateral noninjured knee. However, no study has evaluated the reliability of PTD according to knee flexion angle (KFA) measurements on stress radiographs. PURPOSE: To evaluate the test-retest reliability of stress radiographic measurements of the KFA in the noninjured knee. In addition, we established a reliable range of KFAs to indicate posterior instability by comparing results with the instability measured at 90° KFA, which is considered the gold standard. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: We evaluated patients who had undergone bilateral stress radiographic examinations at least 5 times for ligament injuries between January 2013 and November 2019. All examinations were performed on a Telos device with a 150-N posterior load. A total of 120 knees and 644 stress radiographs were enrolled. We measured the KFA and PTD on stress radiographs and evaluated the reliability of repeated PTD measurement and the correlation between KFA and PTD. RESULTS: The distribution of the actual noninjured knee KFA ranged from 56.9° to 106.7°. Among the 644 radiographs, 155 (24.1%) showed KFAs between 85° and 95°, and 287 (44.6%) showed KFAs between 80° and 85°. A significant correlation was found between KFA and PTD (P < .001), and the intrapatient intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.788. A KFA range of 85° to 92° satisfied the criteria of high ICC (0.885) and nonsignificant correlation between KFA and PTD (P = .055) and thus was considered a reliable range of KFAs for quantifying posterior instability. We found no significant risk factors for measurement error, including age (P = .674), sex (P = .328), height (P = .957), weight (P = .248), or body mass index (P = .257). CONCLUSION: We found high reproducibility of posterior displacement measurements on Telos stress radiography at a KFA of 85° to 92° in noninjured knees.

Ultrasound-guided needle decompression and steroid injection for calcific tendinitis of the shoulder: risk factors for repeat procedures and outcome analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although ultrasound-guided needle decompression (US-GND) can treat calcific tendinitis of the shoulder effectively, repeat procedures might be required for unresolved symptoms. We evaluated the overall clinical outcomes of US-GND with subacromial steroid injection and the final results and factors predisposing toward repeat procedures. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients who underwent US-GND for calcific tendinitis of the supraspinatus/infraspinatus were analyzed between March 2017 and December 2018. The clinical outcomes (pain visual analog scale, functional visual analog scale [FVAS], and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] score) and final subjective satisfaction were compared between groups A (single US-GND) and B (repeat US-GND). The factors predisposing toward repeated US-GNDs were analyzed. RESULTS: We found that 59.3% (58/98) of patient ASES scores were ≥80, and 73.5% of patients (72/98) were satisfied with the outcome. Group B (n=14) demonstrated a significantly higher rate of dominant-arm involvement compared to group A (78.6% vs. 48.8%, P=0.046). However, initial calcification size, shape, number, density, subscapularis involvement, lavage, and procedure time did not differ significantly between the groups. Group B showed poorer final FVAS (7 [interquartile range, 6-8] vs. 8 [interquartile range, 7-9], p=0.036) and subjective satisfaction compared to group A (satisfied: 5 [35.7%] vs. 67 [79.8%], p<0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: US-GND with subacromial steroid injection is a viable treatment option for calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. Dominant-arm involvement was the only independent factor for repeated US-GND. Final outcome of repeated US-GND for unimproved patients was promising; however, these outcomes were poor compared to those of the patients who improved after the first procedure.

Complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a concise review.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is an ideal treatment for glenohumeral dysfunction due to cuff tear arthropathy. As the number of patients treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty is increasing, the incidence of complications after this procedure also is increasing. The rate of complications in reverse shoulder arthroplasty was reported to be 15%-24%. Recently, the following complications have been reported in order of frequency: periprosthetic infection, dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, neurologic injury, scapular notching, acromion or scapular spine fracture, and aseptic loosening of prosthesis. However, the overall complication rate has varied across studies because of different prosthesis used, improvement of implant and surgical skills, and different definitions of complications. Some authors included complications that affect the clinical outcomes of the surgery, while others reported minor complications that do not affect the clinical outcomes such as minor reversible neurologic deficit or minimal scapular notching. This review article summarizes the processes related to diagnosis and treatment of complications after reverse shoulder arthroplasty with the aim of helping clinicians reduce complications and perform appropriate procedures if/when complications occur.