ABSTRACT
The progression of lymphoedema to elephantiasis associated with increased incidence of episodic adeno-lymphangitis (ADL) is of great concern, as it causes physical suffering, permanent disability and economic loss to lymphatic filariasis patients. This randomized clinical trial aimed to assess the efficacy in terms of reduction of oedema and ADL frequency of three treatment regimens among lymphoedema patients from Orissa, India. The regimens were: (I) oral penicillin--one tablet of 800 000 U penicillin G potassium twice daily for 12 days--repeated every 3 months for 1 year; (II) diethylcarbamazine--6 mg/kg bodyweight for 12 days-repeated every 3 months for 1 year; and (III) topical antiseptic, i.e. betadine ointment. Foot care was part of all regimens. All three drug regimens are efficacious in reducing oedema and frequency of ADL episodes. Although the efficacy was slightly higher in regimen I, the difference was not significant. About half of all patients had reduced oedema after the 90 days of treatment, with oedema reduction of 75-100% in 20%. A major proportion of the remaining patients had oedema reduced by less than 25%. The proportion of people whose oedema reduced was slightly but not significantly lower in regimen II. anova revealed that lymphoedema reduction varied according to grade; being greatest at grade 1 lymphoedema, followed by grade 2. All three regimens significantly reduced ADL frequency after 1 year of treatment. This may be because of foot care as well as use of antibiotics. The estimated costs of treatment per patient for a period of 3 months are US$2.4, 1.5 and 4.0 respectively for regimen I, II and III. Thus affordable treatments with simple antibiotics and foot care can give substantial relief to the patients and reverse early lymphoedema.
Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosage , Diethylcarbamazine/administration & dosage , Elephantiasis, Filarial/therapy , Penicillins/administration & dosage , Povidone-Iodine/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Administration, Topical , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/administration & dosage , Drug Administration Schedule , Elephantiasis, Filarial/drug therapy , Filaricides/administration & dosage , Foot , Humans , Leg/pathology , Lymphangitis/drug therapy , Lymphangitis/parasitology , Lymphangitis/prevention & control , Middle Aged , Rural Health , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
This paper is based on 1 year round case control study to investigate the economic burden, in terms of treatment costs and loss of work to people affected with chronic lymphatic filariasis in rural communities of Orissa, Eastern India. Around three-fourths of the chronic patients have sought treatment for their condition and spent, on average an amount of INR 396 (approximately US$ 8.7) per year. The major component of the expenditure is the cost of medicines. The data on loss of work time due to chronic condition reveal that the total absenteeism to the work is significantly higher among chronic filariasis patients than controls. The total number of working hours spent per day by patients and controls are 4.94 and 6.06, respectively with a significant difference. The total absenteeism and the total number of working hours per day are influenced significantly by disease condition and other personal characteristics, namely age, sex and family type. The chronic patients lose a total of 68 days of work per year, which is equivalent to 19% of the total working time of the year. The present results show that the chronic conditions of lymphatic filariasis pose considerable burden on the patient, family and community.
Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Elephantiasis, Filarial/economics , Absenteeism , Case-Control Studies , Chronic Disease , Efficiency , Elephantiasis, Filarial/epidemiology , Female , Health Care Costs , Humans , India , Male , Middle Aged , Rural Population , Socioeconomic FactorsABSTRACT
A cross-sectional survey was undertaken to determine the prevalence of disease due to lymphatic filariasis in Khurda district of Orissa, India. The total disease attributable to filariasis was significantly higher in males (14.79%) than females (10.04%). However, elephantiasis is more prevalent in females, and adenolymphangitis is more prevalent in males than their counterparts. The prevalences of various forms of the disease are age dependent in both sexes. About one-seventh of men and women of higher age groups suffered from chronic debilitation forms of the disease. The study suggests that overt clinical forms of lymphatic filariasis constitute a major public health problem in the study area.
