Minute ventilation stabilization during all pressure-control / support mechanical ventilation modes.

The main goal of our prospective randomized study was comparing compare the effectiveness of ventilation control method "Automatic proportional minute ventilation (APMV) "versus manually set pressure control ventilation modes in relationship to lung mechanics and gas exchange. 80 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were randomized into 2 groups. 40 patients in the first group No.1 (APMV group) were ventilated with pressure control (PCV) or pressure support ventilation (PSV) mode with APMV control. The other 40 patients (control group No.2) were ventilated with synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV-p) or pressure control modes (PCV) without APMV. Ventilation control with APMV was able to maintain minute ventilation more precisely in comparison with manual control (p<0.01), similarly deviations of ETCO(2) were significantly lower (p<0.01). The number of manual corrections of ventilation settings was significantly lower when APMV was used (p<0.01). The differences in lung mechanics and hemodynamics were not statistically significant. Ventilation using APMV is more precise in maintaining minute ventilation and gas exchange compared with manual settings. It required less staff intervention, while respiratory system mechanics and hemodynamics are comparable. APMV showed as effective and safe method applicable on top of all pressure control ventilation modes.

Aortic valve-sparing operation versus Bentall and mechanical aortic valve replacement--midterm results.

OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate short-term (one-to-six months) and mid-term (six-to-forty-eight months) results of aortic valve-sparing procedures. The second endpoint was to compare the results with the group of patients undergoing mechanical aortic valve replacement during the same period. METHODS: Between April 2008 and May 2012 at our institution, we treated 76 patients either with ascending aorta/root aneurysm/dissection or with isolated aortic regurgitation. A total of seventy-six patients undergoing aortic valve surgery. RESULTS: Analyzed parameters were divided into two parts as function of time. In the first part, i.e. during hospitalization, the mortality, duration of hospitalization, duration of extra corporeal circulation (ECC), and duration of cardiac arrest (CA) were compared and assessed. In the second part, i.e. during monitoring of the patients after their discharge from hospital (one-to-six months, and six-to-forty-eight months), the grade of postoperative AR aimed mainly at the group of aortic valve-sparing operations (subgroups A1, A2, A3), postoperative peak gradient, presence of thromboembolic and bleeding complications, postoperative endocarditis and need for reoperation or hospitalization due to cardiac reasons were analyzed. CONCLUSION: Based on our first experience, we believe that in spite of higher technical difficulty, the aortic valve-sparing operations can be possibly performed with the same or respectively lower rate of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Presented results show that compared with the aortic valve replacement, the aortic valve-sparing operation is a promising method, and an interesting therapeutic alternative for patients. After proper indications, we consider it to be a method of choice (Tab. 6, Fig. 7, Ref. 28).