Quality of life outcomes in peri-urethral calcium hydroxylapatite injection.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Peri-urethral calcium hydroxylapatite injection is an established treatment for patients with stress urinary incontinence. Information is limited regarding calcium hydroxylapatite treatment and quality of life (QOL) outcomes. We hypothesize that patients might improve QOL after peri-urethral calcium hydroxylapatite injection, which was reflected in validated questionnaires. METHODS: The peri-urethral calcium hydroxylapatite injection billing code was used to identify patients who underwent injection from 2011-2013. Female patients who completed the American Urological Association Symptom Score (AUASS), the AUASS QOL and Michigan Incontinence Symptom Index (M-ISI), and the bother score (M-ISI bother), or pad count at baseline and follow-up were included. Change in questionnaire scores and pads were assessed using the paired t test. RESULTS: Sixty patients underwent 1 (30), 2 (63) or 3 (7 %) peri-urethral calcium hydroxylapatite injections performed by a single surgeon. Thirty-seven patients provided questionnaires and 38 provided pad counts, all with a mean age of 75 years. The overall AUASS, AUASS QOL, and overall M-ISI scores improved in 67.6, 54.8, and 61.3 % respectively (4.5 ± 7.9, 1.3 ± 1.7 and 5.5 ± 8.6 respectively). The M-ISI bother score improved in 44.8 % with a mean improvement of 0.5 ± 2.9, but did not reach significance. There was a 1.7 ± 3.7 decrease in the mean number of pads used daily after the procedure (p = 0.006) and 19 % experienced transient urinary retention. CONCLUSIONS: Peri-urethral calcium hydroxylapatite injections can improve urinary QOL scores in patients with initial and recurrent stress urinary incontinence. This short-term retrospective analysis suggests that larger long-term studies focusing on QOL outcomes are needed to evaluate the effect of peri-urethral calcium hydroxylapatite has on incontinence-specific QOL.

Testis sperm extraction.

The last 20 years have produced developments in the treatment for patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) who were once considered to be infertile. The combination of intracytoplasmic sperm injection together with various testicular sperm retrieval techniques, including conventional testicular sperm extraction (TESE), microdissection TESE (micro-TESE) and fine needle aspiration (FNA), have revolutionized treatment for these men. In men with NOA, isolated regions of spermatogenesis within the testis are common. The goal for all types of sperm retrieval procedures is locating the focal region(s) of spermatogenesis, and harvesting the sperm for assisted reproduction. This review article explores the surgical management of men with NOA and describes all techniques that can be used for testicular sperm retrieval. A PubMed search was conducted using the key words: "sperm extraction", "NOA", "testicular FNA", "testicular mapping", "TESE", and "testicular biopsy". All articles were reviewed. Articles were included if they provided data on sperm retrieval rates. The methods for performing sperm retrieval rates and outcomes of the various techniques are outlined. Micro-TESE has a higher sperm retrieval rates with fewer postoperative complications and negative effects on testicular function compared with conventional TESE.