Positive effects of audit and feedback on antimicrobial use in hospitalized patients limited to audited patients.

Objective: Audit and feedback is an antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) strategy, with the potential to also optimize antimicrobial use in non-audited patients. This study aimed to determine whether audit and feedback reduce antimicrobial use in both audited and non-audited patients. Design: Before-after trial with a 1-year intervention period and 2.5-year historical cohort. Setting: 750-bed community hospital in the Netherlands. Patients: All patients admitted to the urology wards during the 3.5-year study period were observed. Patients were classified as using antimicrobials if any antimicrobial was used for therapeutic reasons. Patients using antimicrobials prophylactically were excluded from measurements. Intervention: The AMS team provided audit and feedback on antimicrobial use for patients using antimicrobials for 2 days. Retrospectively, antimicrobial use and length of stay (LOS) were compared with the historical cohort. Results: Audits modified antimicrobial treatment in 52.8% of the cases. De-escalating, stopping, and switching from intravenous to oral treatment accounted for 72% of these modifications. Compared to patients from the cohort, who also used antimicrobials for 2 days, antimicrobial use decreased from 14.21 DDD/patient (95% CI, 13.08-15.34) to 11.45 DDD/patient (95% CI, 8.26-14.64; P = .047) for audited patients. Furthermore, mean LOS decreased from 7.42 days (95% CI, 6.79-8.06) to 6.13 days (95% CI, 5.38-6.89; P = .031). However, looking at all patients admitted to the urology wards, the percentage of patients using antimicrobials and total antimicrobial use remained unchanged. Conclusions: Audit and feedback reduce antimicrobial use and LOS, but only for audited patients. Positive effects are not automatically transferred to patients for whom no audits have been performed.

Determinants associated with work participation in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis taking tumor necrosis factor inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE: Reduced work participation (WP) is a common problem for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and generates high costs for society. Therefore, it is important to explore determinants of WP at the start of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment, and for changes in WP after 2 years of TNFi treatment. METHODS: Within the Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring (DREAM) biologic register, WP data were available from 508 patients with RA younger than 65 years and without an (early) retirement pension. WP was registered at start of TNFi treatment and after 2 years of followup and was measured by single patient-reported binary questions whether they had work, paid or voluntary, or had a disability allowance or a retirement pension. Determinants measured at baseline were age, sex, disease duration, functional status [through Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)], 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28), rheumatoid factor, presence of erosions, number of previous disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, and number of comorbidities. During the 2 years of followup, HAQ-DI response and European League Against Rheumatism response were measured. Univariate analyses (excluded if p value was > 0.2) and multivariate (excluded if p value was > 0.1) logistic regression analyses were used. RESULTS: Determinants associated with WP at baseline were having a better HAQ-DI (OR 0.32, p = 0.000) and male sex (OR 0.65, p = 0.065). After 2 years of TNFi therapy, 11.8% (n = 60) started to work and 13.6% (n = 69) stopped working. Determinants associated with starting to work were better baseline HAQ-DI (OR 0.58), positive RF (OR 2.73), and young age (OR 0.96); and for stopping work, worse baseline HAQ-DI (OR 2.74), low HAQ-DI response (OR 0.31), and comorbidity (OR 2.67), all with p < 0.1. CONCLUSION: Young patients with RA and a high functional status without any comorbidity will have a better chance of working. This supports the main goal in the management of RA: to suppress disease activity as soon and as completely as possible to prevent irreversible destruction of the joints, and thus maintain a good functional status of the patient. Because of the low proportion of variance explained by the models in this study, other factors besides the ones studied are associated with WP.

Rheumatoid factor and antibodies to cyclic citrullinated Peptide differentiate rheumatoid arthritis from undifferentiated polyarthritis in patients with early arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To study the diagnostic value of IgM rheumatoid factor (RF), IgA-RF, antibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP), and combinations of these antibodies, measured at baseline, to discriminate rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from undifferentiated polyarthritis (uPA) in patients with recent onset arthritis. METHODS: Patients with early arthritis with peripheral arthritis of 2 or more joints and symptom duration less than 3 years were clinically diagnosed as having RA or uPA by an experienced rheumatologist during the first year. Patients with bacterial, psoriatic, or crystal induced arthritis or spondyloarthropathy were excluded. Optimal cutoff values for serum IgM RF, IgA RF, and anti-CCP were deduced from receiver operating characteristics curves in order to predict the diagnosis of RA in early arthritis. RESULTS: A total of 379 patients (69% female, median age 57 yrs, range 17-86 yrs) were studied; 258 patients were clinically diagnosed as RA and 121 as uPA. Both IgM-RF > 40 IU/ml and anti-CCP > 50 AU/ml showed high specificity, but the sensitivity of these tests was low. In many RA patients the occurrence of IgM-RF and anti-CCP antibodies was independent. Thus the optimal criterion proved to be the combination of IgM-RF > 40 or anti-CCP > 50, which yielded sensitivity of 55.4% and specificity of 96.7%. CONCLUSION: The criterion IgM-RF > 40 or anti-CCP > 50 is able to predict the diagnosis of RA in early arthritis patients with high specificity and acceptable sensitivity. Anti-CCP testing combined with IgM-RF testing has additional value over IgM-RF testing alone in patients with early undifferentiated oligo and polyarthritis.