Specialty Psychiatric Services in US Emergency Departments and General Hospitals: Results From a Nationwide Survey.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the handling of psychiatric patients in medical hospitals and emergency departments (EDs) as well as hospital characteristics associated with the availability of psychiatric services in these settings. METHODS: From October 1, 2017, to April 1, 2018, a telephone survey regarding the presence and nature of psychiatric services was attempted among all US registered Medicare hospitals. RESULTS: Of the included 4812 US hospitals, 2394 (50%) were surveyed. Of these hospitals, 1108 (46%) have some psychiatric services available, either in medical EDs or through psychiatric consultation on general medical inpatient wards. If medical ED patients with active psychiatric issues need admission, 59% of hospitals transfer the patient to a different hospital and 28% admit the patient to a medical ward. Exploration by logistic regression analysis of the association of selected variables and available psychiatric expertise suggested that larger hospitals, nonprofit services, or hospitals in urban settings were more likely to have psychiatrists on staff or available for consultation. CONCLUSION: Despite the growing number of psychiatric patients seeking help in medical EDs and general hospitals, more than 50% of the EDs and general hospitals lack psychiatric services. These results suggest that accessibility to psychiatric care in medical settings requires improvement.

Evaluation of opening a type III/IV medical psychiatric unit.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to examine the impact of opening a medical psychiatric unit (MPU) on a variety of outcomes. METHODS: In this non-equivalent groups design, there were two groups: 'pre-MPU' and 'actual MPU'. Staff assessed whether patients in the pre-MPU group were eligible for admission to a planned MPU, resulting in virtual admissions and discharges. The actual MPU group consisted of patients admitted after opening of the MPU. RESULTS: The length of stay (LOS) in the hospital was one day longer for patients in the MPU group (8.68 vs. 9.89, p = .004), but the LOS on the MPU was comparable in both groups (5.63 vs. 6.06, p = .231). The LOS on the intensive care unit (ICU) was longer in the MPU group (0.10 vs. 0.40, p < .001), even as the time patients were physically restraint (0.28 vs. 0.83, p < .001). In the pre-MPU group, the odds were not significantly different for involuntary commitment (OR = 0.92; p = .866) and death within six months after discharge (OR = 1.84; p = .196). CONCLUSIONS: Both physical restraint and ICU admission have a link with patient complexity, it therefore seemed that opening of the MPU resulted in the treatment of more complex patients with a comparable LOS on the MPU.KEY POINTSThe LOS on the MPU was not significantly different between the groups before and after opening of the MPU.Opening of the MPU resulted in the admission of patients that were admitted more days to the ICU and to more days of physically restraint.It can be considered that opening of the MPU resulted in an increased ability to treat complex patients.