Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Hip Preserv Surg ; 3(1): 37-42, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27026817

ABSTRACT

Discussion persists about the outcome and results of hip arthroscopy in obese patients. Hip arthroscopy gained popularity over time. A current discussion is if obese patients can reach similar results after surgery compared with non-obese. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review of literature about hip arthroscopy and obesity. We searched the Pubmed/Medline databases for literature and included three studies that compared the outcome of hip arthroscopy between different BMI groups. We extracted and pooled the data. For continues data a weighted mean difference was calculated, for dichotomous variables a weighted odds ratio (OR) was calculated using Review Software Manager. Heterogeneity of the included studies was calculated using I(2) statistics. Data were extracted from two studies. In the Obese group, there was significant more conversion to total hip replacement or resurfacing hip replacement (OR = 2.21, 95% CI 1.07-4.56) and more re-arthroscopy (OR = 4.68, 95% CI 1.41-15.45). Any reoperation occurred more often in the obese group (OR = 2.87, 95% CI 1.53-5.38). In the Non Arthritic Hip Score obese scored lower than the non-Obese group [10.9 (-14,6 to 7.1)]. For the modified Harris Hip Score the score is - 6,6, according to the MCID this difference is clinically relevant. For both scores obese show lower outcomes but similar improvement after hip arthroscopy. Regarding a higher chance of needing a re-operation and lower subjective outcome scores obesity appears to have a negative influence on the outcome of hip arthroscopy.

2.
J Hand Surg Br ; 29(2): 148-51, 2004 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15010161

ABSTRACT

Progressive ulnar translocation of the carpus and problems with the ulnar stump have been reported after resection of the distal ulna in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However this has only occasionally been quantitatively assessed. In this study 24 wrists in 21 patients with RA were followed up for an average of 100 months after resection of the distal ulna. An additional 24 wrists in 14 non-operated RA patients were followed up for 92 months. In a retrospective radiographic analysis we demonstrate similar increases in ulnar translocation and ulnar-carpal distances in both groups.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnostic imaging , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/surgery , Carpal Bones/diagnostic imaging , Ulna/diagnostic imaging , Ulna/surgery , Wrist Joint/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/pathology , Carpal Bones/pathology , Carpal Bones/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiography , Retrospective Studies , Ulna/pathology , Wrist Joint/pathology , Wrist Joint/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...